Fault propagation fold growth during the 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake?

Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth

Volumn 102, Issue 6, 1997, Pages 11931-11942

  Souter, B J ^a   Hager, B H ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEFORMATION; FAULT PROPAGATION FOLD; GPS; NORTHRIDGE EARTHQUAKE 1994;

USA, CALIFORNIA;

EID: 3643127100     PISSN: 21699313     EISSN: 21699356     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/97jb00209     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Arnadottir, T., and P. Segall, The 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake imaged from inversion of geodetic data, J. Geophys. Res., 99(B11), 21,835-21,855, 1994.
2. Arnadottir, T., P. Segall, and M. Matthews, Resolving the discrepancy between geodetic and seismic fault models for the 1989 Loma Prieta, California, earthquake, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 82(5), 2248-2255, 1992.
3. Davis, T. L., and J. S. Namson, A balanced cross-section of the 1994 Northridge earthquake, southern California, Nature, 372, 167-169, 1994.
4. Du, Y., A. Aydin, and P. Segall, Comparison of various inversion techniques as applied to the determination of a geophysical deformation models for the 1983 Borah Peak earthquake, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 82(4), 1840-1866, 1992.
5. Du, Y., P. Segall, and H. Gao, Dislocations in inhomogeneous media via a moduli perturbation approach: General formulation and two-dimensional solution s, J. Geophys. Res., 99 (B7), 13,767-13,779, 1994.
6. Eberhart-Phillips, D., and W. Stuart, Material heterogeneity simplifies the picture: Loma Prieta, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 82(4), 1964-1968, 1992.
7. Feigl, K., et al., Space geodetic measurement of the velocity field of central and southern California, 1984-1992, J. Geophys. Res., 98(B12), 21,677-21,712, 1993.
8. Hager, B. H., R. W. King, and M. H. Murray, Measurement of crustal deformation using the global positioning system, Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci., 19, 351-382, 1991.
9. Harris, R., and P. Segall, Detection of a locked zone at depth on the Parkfield, California, segment of the San Andreas Fault, J. Geophys. Res., 92, (B8), 7945-7962, 1987.
10. Hauksson, E., L. M. Jones, and K. Hutton, The 1994 Northridge earthquake sequence in California: Seismological and tectonic aspects, J. Geophys. Res., 100(B7), 12,335-12,355, 1995.
11. Herring, T. A., GLOBK: Global Kalman Filter VLBI and GPS analysis program, version. 3.1, Mass. Inst. of Technol., Cambridge, 1993.
12. Hudnut, K., Z. Shen, M. Murray, S. McClusky, R. King, T. Herring, B. Hager, Y. Feng, P. Fang, A. Donnellan, and Y. Bock, Co-seismic displacements of the 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Amer., 86(1B), S19-S36, 1996.
13. Jones, L. M., et al., The magnitude 6.7 Northridge, California, earthquake of 17 January, 1994, Science, 266, 389-397, 1994.
14. King, R. W., and Y. Bock, Documentation for the MIT GPS analysis software: GAMIT, Mass. Inst. of Technol., Cambridge, 1995.
15. Lawson, C. L., and R. J. Hanson. Solving Least Squares Problems, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N. J., 1974
16. Massonnet, D., K. L. Feigl, H. Vadon, and M. Rossi, Coseismic deformation field of the M=6.7 Northridge, California earthquake of January 17, 1994 recorded by two radar satellites using interferometry, Geophys. Res. Lett., 23(9), 969-972, 1996.
17. Matthews, M., Fault slip in time and space, Ph.D. thesis, Stanford Univ., Stanford, Calif., 1991.
18. Menke, W., Geophysical Data Analysis: Discrete Inverse Theory, Int. Geophys. Ser., vol. 45, rev. ed., Academic, San Diego, Calif., 1989.
19. Mitra, S., Duplex Structures and imbricate thrust systems: Geometry, structural position, and hydrocarbon potential, AAPG Bull., 70, 1087-1112, 1986.
20. Okada, Y., Surface deformation due to shear and tensile faults in a half-space. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 75, 1135-1154, 1985.
21. Savage, J. C., and L. M. Hastie, Surface deformation associated with dip-slip faulting, J. Geophys. Res., 71, 4897-4904, 1966.
22. Segall, P., and R. Harris, Earthquake deformation cycle on the San Andreas fault near Parkfield, California, J. Geophys. Res., 92(B10), 10,511-10,525, 1987.
23. Shen, Z.-K., B. X. Ge, D. Jackson, D. Potter, M. Cline and L.-Y. Sung, Northridge Earthquake rupture models based on the Global Positioning System measurements. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 86(1B), S37-S48, 1996.
24. Stein, R. S., and G. C. King, Seismic potential revealed by surface folding: 1983 Coalinga, California, earthquake, Science, 224(4651), 869-872, 1984.
25. Stein, R. S., G. C. King, and J. Lin, Stress triggering of the 1994 M=6.7 Northridge, California earthquake by its predecessors. Science, 265, 1432-1435, 1994.
26. Suppe, J., Principles of Structural Geology, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N. J., 1985.
27. Suppe, J., and D. A. Medwedeff, Geometry and kinematics of fault propagation folding, Eclogae Geol. Helv., 83(3), 409-454, 1990.
28. Wald, D. J., and T. H. Heaton, A dislocation model of the 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake determined from strong ground motions, U. S. Geol. Surv. Open File Rep. 94-278, 1994.
29. Wald, D. J., T. H. Heaton and K. W. Hudnut, The slip history of the 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake determined from strong-motion, teleseismic, GPS and leveling data, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 86(1B), S49-S70, 1996.
30. Wessel, P., and W. H. F. Smith, The GMT System Technical Reference and Cookbook, vol. 2.1.4, Sch. of Ocean and Earth Sci. and Technol., NOAA, Honolulu, Hawaii, 1993.
31. Yeats, R. S., and G. J. Huftile, The Oak Ridge fault system and the 1994 Northridge earthquake, Nature, 373, 418-420, 1995.
32. Zhang, J., Y. Bock, P. Fang, J. Behr, J. Genrich, and K. Hudnut, Surface deformation in the Northridge earthquake and the Los Angeles basin from the PGGA time series, Eos Trans. AGU, 75(44), Fall Meet. Suppl., 166, 1994.