Wetland classification using optical and radar data and neural network classification

International Journal of Remote Sensing

Volumn 19, Issue 8, 1998, Pages 1545-1560

  Augusteijn, M F ^a   Warrender, C E ^a  

^a University of Colorado Colorado Springs   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECOSYSTEMS; FEEDFORWARD NEURAL NETWORKS; MULTISPECTRAL SCANNERS; SYNTHETIC APERTURE RADAR;

AIRBORNE IMAGING RADAR SYNTHETIC APERTURE RADAR (AIRSAR); AIRBORNE TERRESTRIAL APPLICATIONS SENSOR (ATLAS); WETLAND CLASSIFICATION;

REMOTE SENSING;

IMAGE CLASSIFICATION; NEURAL NETWORK; RADAR; WETLANDS;

EID: 3643090566     PISSN: 01431161     EISSN: 13665901     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/014311698215342     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Auousteijn, M. F., and Dimalanta, A. S., 1992, Feature detection in satellite images using neural network technology. Telematics Informatics, 9, 131-144.
2. Augusteijn, M. F., Clemens, L. E., and Shaw, K. A., 1995, Performance evaluation of texture measures for ground cover identification in satellite images by means of a neural network classifier. I.E.E.E. Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 33, 616-626.
3. Dreyer, P., 1993, Classification of l and cover using optimized neural nets on SPOT data. Photogrammatric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 59, 617-621.
4. Duda, R. O., and H Art, P. E., 1973, Pattern classification and scene analysis (New York: Wiley).
5. Nasa Crsp Report-Nasa Commercial Remote Sensing Program Office and Lockheed Martin Stennis Operations, 1995, An assessment of remote sensing/GIS technologies for delineation of wetlands. Draft report to Environmental Protection Agency, 29 SEPTEMbER 1995.
6. Fahlman, S. E., and Lebiere, C., 1990, The cascade-correlation learning architecture. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 2, edited by D. Touretzky (San Mateo: Morgan Kaufmann), pp. 524- 532.
7. fication. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 56, 469-473.
8. Hess, L. L., Melack, J. M., and Simonett, D. S., 1990, Radar detection of flooding beneath the forest canopy: a review. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 11, 1313-1325.
9. Lee, J., Weger, R. C., Sengupta, S. K., and Welch, R. M., 1990, A neural network approach to cloud classification. I.E.E.E. Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 28, 846-855.
10. Lillesand, T. M., and Kiefer, R. W., 1994, Remote sensing and image interpretation, third edition. (New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.). p. 219.
11. Mitsch, W. J., and Gosselink, J. G., 1993, Wetlands, second edition. (New York: Von Nostr and Reinhold Publishers). p. 517.
12. Paula, J. D., and Schowengerdt, R. A., 1995, A detailed comparison of backpropagation neural network and maximum-likelihood classifiers for urban land use classification. I.E.E.E. Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 33, 981-996.
13. Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., and Williams, R. J., 1986, Learning internal representations by error propagation. In Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition, Vol. 1: Foundations, edited by D. E. Rumelhart and J. L. McClell and (Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press), pp. 318-362.
14. ficial Neural Networks (London: Springer-Verlag), pp. 899-902.
15. Wilen, W. O., and Pywell, H. R., 1992, Remote sensing of the nation’s wetl ands, national wetl and inventory. In Proceedings of the Fourth Biennial Forest Service Remote Sensing Applications Conference, (Bethesda, Maryl and: American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing).
16. Wilen, W. O., and Smith, S., 1996, Assessment of remote sensing/GIS technologies to improve national wetlands inventory maps. In Proceedings of the Sixth Biennial Forest Service Remote Sensing Applications Conference (Bethesda, Maryl and: American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing), pp. 50-64.