Trends in metadata practices: A longitudinal study of collection federation

Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Digital Libraries

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 386-395

  Palmer, Carole L ^a   Zavalina, Oksana L ^a   Mustafoff, Megan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

Aggregated services; Descriptive metadata; Federated digital collections; IMLS digital collections and content project; Interoperability; Metadata schemes

Indexed keywords

AGGREGATED SERVICES; DESCRIPTIVE METADATA; FEDERATED DIGITAL COLLECTIONS; IMLS DIGITAL COLLECTIONS AND CONTENT PROJECTS;

DIGITAL LIBRARIES; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS; INTEROPERABILITY; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; RESOURCE ALLOCATION;

METADATA;

EID: 36349032345     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1255175.1255251     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Agogino, A.M. Enhancing Interoperability of Collections and Services. Final Report, Dec. 2004. http://best.me.berkeley.edu/%7Eaagogino/ papers/Final_Repo rt_SMETE.pdf
2. Arms, C. R. Available and useful: OAI at the Library of Congress. Library Hi Tech, 21, 2 (2003), 129-139. http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/ techdocs/libht2003.html#exploit
3. Bailey-Hainer, B., and Urban, R. The Colorado Digitization Program: A Collaboration Success Story. Library Hi Tech 22, 3 (2004), 254-262.
4. Besser, H. The next stage: Moving from isolated digital collections to interoperable digital libraries. First Monday, 7, 6 (2002). http://firstmonday.org/issues/ issue7_6/besser/index.html.
5. Bishoff, L., and Allen, N. Business Planning for Cultural Heritage Institutions. Council on Library and Information Resources, Washington, DC, 2004. http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub124/contents.html
6. Brogan, M. L. A Survey of Digital Library Aggregation Services. Digital Library Federation, Washington, DC, 2003. http://www.diglib.org/pubs/ brogan/
7. Brogan, M. Contexts and Contributions: Building the Distributed Library. Digital Library Federation/Council on Library and Information Resources, Washington, DC, 2006. http://www.diglib.org/pubs/dlf106/
8. Dunn, H. Collection level description-the museum perspective. D-Lib Magazine, 6, 9 (Sept. 2000). http://www.dlib.org/dlib/september00/dunn/ 09dunn.html.
9. Foulonneau, M. et al. Using collection descriptions to enhance an aggregation of harvested item-level metadata. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (Denver, CO, June 7-11, 2005), 32-41.
10. Heery, R., and Anderson, S. Digital Repositories Review. UKOLN, AHDS. (Feb. 19, 2005). http://www.jisc.ac.uk/upl.oaded_documents/ digitalrepositories-review-2005 .pdf.
11. Heery, R., and Powell, A. Digital Repositories Roadmap: Looking Forward. UKOLN, Eduserv Foundation. (April 2006). http://www.jisc.ac.uk/ uploaded_documents/reproadmap-vl5.doc
12. Hunter, J.L. A survey of metadata research for organizing the web. Library Trends, 52, 2 (2003), 318-344.
13. Kastens, K. et al. Questions & challenges arising in building the collection of a Digital Library for Education: lessons from five years of DLESE. D-Lib Magazine, 11,11 (Nov. 2005) http://www.dlib.Org/dlib/.november05/ kaste.ns/11 kastens.html
14. Knutson, E., Palmer, C.L., and Twidale, M. Tracking metadata use for digital collections. In Proceedings of the International DCMI Metadata Conference and Workshop (DC03) (Seattle, WA, Sept. 28-Oct. 2, 2003), 243-244.
15. Lagoze, C., and Fielding, D. Defining collections in distributed digital libraries. D-Lib Magazine (Nov. 1998). http://www.dlib.org/dlib/ november98/lagoze/11lagoze.html
16. Lagoze, C. et al. What is a digital library anymore, anyway? Beyond search and access in the NSDL. D-Lib Magazine 11, 11 (Nov. 2005). http://www.dlib.Org/dlib/november05/lagoze/11 lagoze.html# n3
17. Lagoze, C. et al. Metadata aggregation and "automated digital libraries": A retrospective on the NSDL experience. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (Chapel Hill, NC, June 11-15, 2006), 230-239.
18. Lagoze, C. et al. Representing Contextualized Information in the NSDL. 2006. Preprint available from http://www.arxiv.org/ftp/cs/papers/0603/ 0603024.pdf.
19. Lee, H. What is a collection? Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51, 12(2000), 1106-1113.
20. Marmor, M. Six lessons learned: An (early) ARTstor retrospective. RLG DigiNews, 10,2 (April 2006). http://www.rlg.org/en/page.php?Page_ID= 20916#article0.
21. Palmer, C.L. Thematic research collections. In A Companion to Digital Humanities. Blackwell, Maiden, MA, 2004, 348-365.
22. Palmer, C.L., and Knutson, E. Metadata practices and implications for federated collections. In Proceedings of the 67th ASISaT Annual Meeting (Providence, RI, Nov. 12-17, 2004).
23. Palmer, C.L., Knutson, E., Twidale, M, and Zavalina, O. Collection Definition in Federated Digital Resource Development. In Proceedings of the 69th ASIS&T Annual Meeting (Austin, TX, Nov. 3-8, 2006).
24. Shreeves, S.L, Kaczmarek, J.S, and Cole, T.W. Harvesting cultural heritage metadata using the OAI protocol. Library Hi Tech, 21, 2 (2003), 159-169.
25. Stvilia, B., Gasser, L., Twidale, M., Shreeves, S.L, and Cole, T.W. Metadata quality for federated collections. In Proceedings of ICIQ04 - 9th International Conference on Information Quality. (Cambridge, MA, Nov. 5-7, 2004), 111-125.
26. Sweet, M., and Thomas, D. Archives described at collection level. D-Lib Magazine, 6, 9 (Sept. 2000). http://www.dlib.org/dlib/september00/ sweet/09sweet.html.
27. Zavalina, O. Collection-level user searches in federated digital resource environment. Forthcoming. In Proceedings of the 70th ASIS&T Annual Meeting (Milwaukee WI, Oct. 18-25, 2007).