Development of a robot-assisted rehabilitation therapy to train hand function for activities of daily living

2007 IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, ICORR'07

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 678-682

  Lambercy, Olivier ^a   Dovat, Ludovic ^a   Johnson, Vineet ^c   Salman, Bema ^c   Wong, Stephen ^c   Gassert, Roger ^b   Milner, Theodore ^c   Leong, Teo Chee ^a   Burdet, Etienne ^b  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^b IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEGREES OF FREEDOM (MECHANICS); PATIENT REHABILITATION; PATIENT TREATMENT;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; FUNCTIONAL APPROACH; HEALTHY SUBJECTS; POTENTIAL BENEFITS; ROBOT-ASSISTED REHABILITATION; ROBOTIC EQUIPMENTS; ROBOTIC INTERFACE; TWO-DEGREE OF FREEDOM;

ROBOTICS;

EID: 36349018836     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICORR.2007.4428498     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. MC Cirstea and MF Levin, Compensatory strategies for reaching in stroke. Brain, 123:940-953, 2000.
2. DG Kamper, HC Fischer, EG Cruz, and WZ Rymer, Weakness is the primary contributor to finger impairment in chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 87:1262-1269, 2006.
3. CE Lang and MH Schieber. Reduced muscle selectivity during individuated finger movements in humans after damage to the motor cortex or corticospinal tract. J Neurophysiol, 91:1722-1733, 2004.
4. Marc H, Schieber and Marco Santello, Hand function: Peipheral and central constraints on performance. J Appl Physiol, 96:2293-2300, 2004.
5. P Raghavan, E Petra, JW Krakauer, and AM Gordon. Patterns of impairment in digit independence after subcortical stroke, J Neurophysiol, 95:369-378, 2006.
6. GB Prange, MJA Jannink, CG Groothuis-Oudshoorn, HJ Hermens, and MJ Ijzerman. Systematic review of the effect of robot-aided therapy on recovery of the hemiparetic arm after stroke, Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 43(2):171-184, 2006.
7. R Riener, T Nef, and G Colombo. Robot-aided neurorehabilitation of the upper extremities, Med. Biol. Eng. Comput., 43:2-10, 2005.
8. M Bouzit, G Burdea, G Popescu, and R Boian. The Rutgers Master II: New design force-feedback glove, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, pages 256-263, 2002.
9. S Adamovich, A Merians, R Boian, J Lewis, M Tremaine, G Burdea, M Recce, and H Poizner. A virtual reality-based exercise system for hand rehabilitation post-stroke, Presence, 14(2):161-174, 2005.
10. T Kline, D Kamper, and B Schmit. Control system for pneumatically controlled glove to assist in grasp activities, 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005.
11. CD Takahashi, L Der-Yeghiaian, VH Le, and S Cramer, A robotic device for hand motor therapy after stroke, Proceedings of the 9th IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR), pages 17-20, 2005.
12. T Nef, M Mihelj, G Colombo, and R Riener. ARMin robot for rehabilitation of the upper extremities, Proc. of the 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pages 3152-3157, 2006.
13. H Kawasaki, S Ito, Y Nishimoto, and H and Kimura. Hand rehabilitation support system based on self-motion-control, TExCRA, pages 55-56, 2004.
14. S Hesse, G Schulte-Tigges, M Konrad, A Bardeleben, and C Werner, Robot-assisted arm trainer for the passive and active practive of bilateral forearm and wrist movements in hemiparetic subjects, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 84:915-920, 2003.
15. 0 Lambercy, L Dovat, Y Ruffieux, R Gassert, CL Teo, T Milner, H Bleuler, and E Burdet, Development of robotic tools for the rehabilitation of hand functions after stroke. In Proc. CMBEC, 2006.
16. L Dovat, O Lambercy, Y Ruffieux, D Chapuis, R Gassert, H Bleuler, CL Teo, and E Burdet. A haptic knob for rehabilitation of stroke patient, In Proc. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2006.
17. T Milner, O Lambercy, L Dovat, R Gassert, CL Teo, and E Burdet, Robotic devices to restore hand function after stroke. In Robotics for Society, VSCS Conference, 2007.
18. H Forssberg, AC Eliasson, H Kinoshita, RS Johansson, and G Westling. Development of human precision grip i: Basic coordination of force, Experimental Brain Research, (85):451-457, 1991.
19. N Smaby, ME Johanson, B Baker, DE Kenney, WM Murray, and VR Hentz, Identification of key pinch forces required to complete functional tasks. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 41:215-224, 2004.
20. LPM - EPFL Sensors Millinewton: http://lpm.epfl.ch/tf -examples of devices, 2006
21. DG Kamper and WZ Rymer. Impairment of voluntary control of finger motion following stroke: Role of inappropriate muscle coactivation. Muscle and Nerve, 24:673-681, 2001.
22. N Hogan, HI Krebs, B Rohrer, JJ Palazzolo, L Dipietro, SE Fasoli, J Stein, R Hughes, WR Frontera, R Lynch, and BT Volpe, Motions or muscles? some behavioral factors underlying robotic assistance of motor recovery, Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 45:605-618, 2006.
23. LE Kahn, PS Lum, WZ Rymer, and DJ Reinkensmeyer, Robot-assisted movement training for the stroke-impaired arm: Does it matter what the robot does? Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 43:619-630, 2006.
24. VM Pomeroy and RC Tallis, Physical therapy to improve movement performance and functional ability poststroke. part 2. a research direction. Reviews in Clinical Gerontology, 10:381-387, 2000.