L2R: A logical method for reference reconciliation

Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Volumn 1, Issue , 2007, Pages 329-334

  Saïs, Fatiha ^a   Pernelle, Nathalie ^a   Rousset, Marie Christine ^b  

^a UFR 919 Laboratoire d'Informatique Pour la Mécanique et les Sciences de l'Ingénieur   (France)

^b LSR Laboratory   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DECISION MAKING; SEMANTICS;

LOGICAL METHOD; REFERENCE RECONCILIATION PROBLEM; RICH DATA MODEL;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

EID: 36349014864     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Ananthakrishna, R.; Chaudhuri, S.; and Ganti, V. 2002. Eliminating fuzzy duplicates in data warehouses. In SIGMOD '02: Proceedings of the 2002 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data. ACM Press.
2. Baxter, R.; Christen, P.; and Churches, T. 2003. A comparison of fast blocking methods for record linkage. In ACM workshop on Data cleaning Record Linkage and Object identification.
3. Bhattacharya, I., and Getoor, L. 2006. Entity Resolution in Graphs. Wiley, chapter Entity Resolution in Graphs.
4. Bilenko, M., and Mooney, R. 2003. Adaptive duplicate detection using learnable string similarity measures. In SIGKDD'03.
5. Chang, C.-L., and Lee, R. C.-T. 1997. Symbolic Logic and Mechanical Theorem Proving. Orlando, FL, USA: Academic Press, Inc.
6. Dong, X.; Halevy, A.; and Madhavan, J. 2005. Reference reconciliation in complex information spaces. In SIGMOD '05: Proceedings of the 2005 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data, 85-96. New York, NY, USA: ACM Press.
7. Galhardas, H.; Florescu, D.; Shasha, D.; Simon, E.; and Saita., C. 2001. Declarative data cleaning: Language, model and algorithms. In VLDB '01.
8. Kalashnikov, D.; Mehrotra, S.; and Chen., Z. 2005. Exploiting relationships for domain-independent data cleaning. In SIAM Data Mining '05.
9. Newcombe, H. B., and Kennedy, J. M. 1962. Record linkage: making maximum use of the discriminating power of identifying information. Commun. ACM 5(11):563-566.
10. Noy, N. 2004. Semantic integration: a survey on ontology-based approaches. SIGMOD Record, Special Issue on Semantic Integration.
11. Omar, B.; Hector, G.-M.; Jeff, J.; Euijong, W. S.; Qi, S.; and Jennifer, W. 2005. Swoosh: A generic approach to entity resolution. Technical repport, Stanford infoLab.
12. Rahm, E., and Bernstein, P. 2001. A survey of approaches to automatic schema matching. VLDB Journal 10:334-350.
13. Shvaiko, P., and Euzenat, J. 2005. A survey of schemabased matching approaches. Journal on Data semantics.
14. Singa, P., and Domingos., P. 2005. Object identification with attribute-mediated dependences. In PKDD '05.
15. w3c Rec. http://www.w3.org/tr/owl-features/.
16. w3c Rec. http://www.w3.org/tr/rdf-schema/.
17. w3c Sub. http://www.w3.org/submission/swrl/.
18. Winkler, W. E. 2006. Overview of record linkage and current research directions. Technical report, Statistical Research Division U.S. Census Bureau Washington, DC 20233.