Reinforcement sensitivity theory at work: Punishment sensitivity as a dispositional source of job-related stress

European Journal of Personality

Volumn 21, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 889-909

  Van Der Linden, Dimitri ^a   Beckers, Debby G J ^a   Taris, Toon W ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Neuroticism and extraversion; Person environment interaction; Personality; Sensitivity for reward and punishment; Stress reaction; Work characteristics

Indexed keywords

EID: 36348998594     PISSN: 08902070     EISSN: 10990984     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/per.660     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1996). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. London: Sage Publications.
2. Bolger, N., DeLongis, A., Kessler, R. C., & Schilling, E. A. (1989). Effects of daily stress on negative mood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 808-818.
3. Bolger, N., & Schilling, E. A. (1991). Personality and the problems of everyday life: The role of neuroticism in exposure and reactivity to daily stressors. Journal of Personality, 59, 355-386.
4. Carver, C. S. (2004). Negative affects deriving from the behavioral approach system. Emotion, 4, 3-22.
5. Carver, C. S., Sutton, S. K., & Scheier, M. F. (2000). Action, emotion, and personality: Emerging conceptual integration. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 741-751.
6. Carver, C. S., & White, T. L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 319-333.
7. Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1988). Mood and the mundane: Relations between daily life events and self-reported mood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 296-308.
8. Cloninger, C., Svrakic, D. M., & Przybeck, T. R. (1993). A psychobiological model of temperament and character. Archives of General Psychiatry, 50, 975-990.
9. Corr, P. J. (2002). J. A. Gray's reinforcement sensitivity theory: Tests of the joint subsystems hypothesis of anxiety and impulsivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 511-532.
10. Corr, P. J. (2004). Reinforcement sensitivity theory and personality. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 28, 317-332.
11. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). The five-factor model of personality and its relevance to personality disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders, 6, 343-359.
12. de Lange, A. H., Taris, T. W., Kompier, M. A. J., Houtman, I. L. D., & Bongers, P. M. (2002). Effects of stable and changing demand-control histories on worker health. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment, & Health, 28, 94-108.
13. de Vries, J., & van Heck, G. L. (2002). Fatigue: Relationships with basic personality and tempera-ment dimensions. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 1311-1324.
14. Depue, R. A. (1995). Neurobiological factors in personality and depression. European Journal of Personality, 9, 413-439.
15. Depue, R. A., & Collins, P. F. (1999). Neurobiology of the structure of personality: Dopamine, facilitation of incentive motivation, and extraversion. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22,491-569.
16. Depue, R. A., Luciana, M., Arbisi, P., Collins, P., & Leon, A. (1994). Dopamine and the structure of personality: Relation of agonist-induced dopamine activity to positive emotionality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 485-498.
17. Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417-440.
18. Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. M. (2002). Approach-avoidance motivation in personality: Approach and avoidance temperaments and goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 804-818.
19. Eysenck, H. J. (1967). The biological basis of personality. Thomas: Spring-field, IL.
20. Franken, I. H. A. (2002). Behavioral approach system (BAS) sensitivity predicts alcohol craving. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 349-355.
21. Franken, I. H. A., Muris, P., & Rassin, E. (2005). Psychometric Properties of the Dutch BIS/BAS Scales. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 27, 25-30.
22. Gable, S. L., Reis, H. T., & Elliot, A. J. (2000). Behavioral activation and inhibition in everyday life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 1135-1149.
23. Gomez, R., & Gomez, A. (2005). Convergent, discriminant and concurrent validities of measures of the behavioural approach and behavioural inhibition systems: Confirmatory factor analytic approach. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 87-102.
24. Gray, J. A. (1970). The psychophysiological basis of introversion- extraversion. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 8, 249-266.
25. Gray, J. A. (1981). A critique of Eysenck's theory of personality. In H. J. Eysenck (Ed.), A model for personality (pp. 246-276). Berlin: Springer.
26. Gray, J. A. (1990). Brain systems that mediate both emotion and cognition. Cognition and Emotion, 4, 269-288.
27. Gray, J. A. (1991). The neuropsychology of temperament. In J. Strelau & A. Angleitner (Eds.), Explorations in temperament: International perspectives on theory and measurement (pp. 105-128). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
28. Hendriks, A. A. J., Hofstee, W. K. B., & De Raad, B. (1999). The Five-Factor Personality Inventory (FFPI). Personality and Individual Differences, 27, 307-325.
29. Heponiemi, T., Keltikangas Jarvinen, L., Puttonen, S., & Ravaja, N. (2003). BIS/BAS sensitivity and self-rated affects during experimentally induced stress. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 943-957.
30. Heponiemi, T., Keltikangas-Jarvinen, L., Kettunen, J., Puttonen, S., & Ravaja, N. (2004). BIS-BAS sensitivity and cardiac autonomic stress profiles. Psychophysiology, 41, 37-45.
31. Jackson, C. J. (2001). Comparison between Eysenck's and Gray's models of personality in the prediction of motivational work criteria. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 129-144.
32. Jackson, C. J., & Smillie, L. D. (2004). Appetitive motivation predicts the majority of personality and an ability measure: A comparison of BAS measures and a re-evaluation of the importance of RST. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 1627-1636.
33. Jorm, A. F., Christensen, H., Henderson, A. S., Jacomb, P. A., Korten, A. E., & Rodgers, B. (1999). Using the BIS/BAS scales to measure behavioural inhibition and behavioural activation: Factor structure, validity and norms in a large community sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 26, 49-58.
34. Judge, T. A., Bono, J. E., & Locke, E. A. (2000). Personality and job satisfaction: The mediating role of job characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 237-249.
35. Karásek, R. (1985). Job content instrument: Questionnaire and user's guide. Los Angeles: Depart-ment of Industrial and Engineering Psychology.
36. Karasek, R., & Theorell, T. (1990). Healthy work: Stress, productivity, and the reconstruction of working life. New York: Basic Books.
37. Kasch, K. L., Rottenberg, J., Arnow, B. A., & Gotlib, I. H. (2002). Behavioral activation and inhibition systems and the severity and course of depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111, 589-597.
38. Langelaan, S., Bakker, A. B., van Doornen, L. J. P., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2006). Burnout and work engagement: Do individual differences make a difference? Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 521-532.
39. Levenstein, S., Pantera, C., Varvo, V., Scribano, M. L., Berto, E., Luzi, C., et al. (1993). Development of the perceived stress questionnaire: A new tool for psychosomatic research. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 37, 19-32.
40. McEwen, B. S. (1998). Stress, adaptation, and disease: Allostasis and allostatic load. In S. M. McCann, J. M. Lipton, E. M. Sternberg, G. P. Chrousos, P. W. Gold, et al. (Eds.), Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences: Neuroimmunomodulation: Molecular aspects, integrative systems, and clinical advances (Vol. 840, pp. 33-44). New York, NY: New York Academy of Sciences.
41. McNaughton, N., & Corr, P. J. (2004). A two-dimensional neuropsychology of defense: Fear/anxiety and defensive distance. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 28, 285-305.
42. Quilty, L. C., & Oakman, J. M. (2004). The assessment of behavioural activation-the relationship between impulsivity and behavioural activation. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 429-442.
43. Schmitt, N. (1994). Method bias: The importance of theory and measurement. Journal of Organ-izational Behavior, 15, 393-398.
44. Semmer, N. K. (2003). Individual differences, work stress, and health. In M. J. Schabracq, J. A. M. Winnubst, & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), The handbook of work & health psychology (2nd ed., pp. 83-120). West Sussex: Wiley, J. & Sons.
45. Smillie, L. D., & Jackson, C. J. (2005). The appetitive motivation scale and other BAS measures in the prediction of approach and active avoidance. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 981-994.
46. Smits, D. J. M., & Boeck, P. D. (2006). From BIS/BAS to the Big Five. European Journal of Personality, 20, 255-270.
47. Stewart, G. L. (1996). Reward structure as a moderator of the relationship between extraversion and sales performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 619-627.
48. Tellegen, A. (1985). Structures of mood and personality and their relevance to assessing anxiety, with an emphasis on self-report. In A. H. Tuma & J. D. Maser (Eds.), Anxiety and the anxiety disorders (pp. 681-706). Hillsdale, NJ, England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
49. van der Doef, M., & Maes, S. (1999). The job Demand-Control (-Support) model and psychological well-being: A review of 20 years of empirical research. Work & Stress, 13, 87-114.
50. van der Linden, D., Taris, T. W., Beckers, D. G., & Kindt, K. A. (2007). Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory and Occupational Health: BAS and BIS on the job. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 1127-1138.
51. van Yperen, N. W., & Janssen, O. (2002). Fatigued and dissatisfied or fatigued but satisfied? Goal orientations and responses to high job demands. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1161-1171.
52. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070.
53. Watson, D., & Pennebaker, J. W. (1989). Health complaints, stress, and distress: Exploring the central role of negative affectivity. Psychological Review, 96, 234-254.