A characterization of dynamic reasoning: Reasoning with time as parameter

Journal of Mathematical Behavior

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 230-246

  Keene, Karen Allen ^a  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Differential equations; Dynamic reasoning; Mathematics education; Motion; Parameter; Time; Undergraduate mathematics

Indexed keywords

EID: 36348995397     PISSN: 07323123     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmathb.2007.09.003     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Arcavi A. Symbol sense: Informal sense-making in formal mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics 14 3 (1994) 24-35
2. Beichner R. The effect of simultaneous motion presentation and graph generation in a kinematics lab. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 2 (1990) 803-815
3. Brasell H. The effect of real-time laboratory graphing on learning graphic representations of distance and velocity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 24 (1987) 385-395
4. Carlson M., Jacobs S., Coe T., Larsen S., and Hsu E.Z. Applying covariational reasoning while modeling dynamic events: A framework and a study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 33 (2002) 352-378
5. Chazan D. Beyond formulas in mathematics teaching: Dynamics of the high school algebra classroom (2000), Teachers College Press, New York, NY
6. Cobb P. Conducting teaching experiments in collaboration with teachers. In: Kelly E., and Lesh R. (Eds). Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (2000), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 307-334
7. Confrey J. Splitting, similarity, and rate of change: A new approach to multiplication and exponential functions. In: Harel G., and Confrey J. (Eds). The development of multiplicative reasoning in the learning of mathematics (1994), State University of New York Press, New York 293-332
8. Confrey J., and Smith E. Exponential functions, rates of change, and the multiplicative unit. Educational Studies in Mathematics 26 (1994) 135-164
9. Drijvers P.H.M. The concept of parameter in a computer algebra environment. In: van den Heuvel-Panhuzen M. (Ed). Proceedings of the 25th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (PME) (2001), Freudenthal Institute, Utrecht 385-392
10. Freudenthal H. Didactical phenomenology of mathematical structures (1983), D. Reidel Publishing Company, The Netherlands
11. Glaser B., and Strauss A. Discovering grounded theory (1967), Aldine, Chicago
12. Goldenberg E., Lewis P., and O'Keefe J. Dynamic representation and the development of a process understanding of function. In: Harel G., and Dubinsky E. (Eds). The concept of function: Aspects of epistemology and pedagogy (1992), Mathematical Association of America, Washington, D.C. 235-260
13. Janvier C. The notion of chronicle as an epistemological obstacle to the concept of function. Journal of Mathematical Behavior 17 (1998) 79-103
14. Kaput J.J. Teaching and learning a new algebra. In: Fennema E., and Romberg T.A. (Eds). Mathematics classrooms that promote understanding (1999), Earlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 133-155
15. Kieren C., and Sfard A. Seeing through symbols: The case of equivalent expressions. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics 21 1 (1999) 1-17
16. Lakoff G., and Núñez R. Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being (2001), Basic Books, New York
17. Lincoln Y., and Guba E. Naturalistic inquiry (1985), Sage, Beverly Hills, CA
18. Lobato J., and Seibert D. Quantitative reasoning in a reconceived view of transfer. Journal of Mathematical Behavior 21 (2002) 87-116
19. Monk S. Students' understanding of a function given by a physical model. In: Harel G., and Dubinsky E. (Eds). The concept of function: Aspects of epistemology and pedagogy (1992), MAA, Washington, DC 175-194
20. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Principles and standards for school mathematics (2000), NCTM, Reston, VA
21. Nemirovsky R., and Tierney C. Children creating ways to represent changing situations: On the development of homogeneous spaces. Educational Studies in Mathematics 45 (2001) 67-102
22. Nemivosky R., Tierney C., and Wright T. Body motion and graphing. Cognition and Instruction 16 (1998) 119-172
23. Núñez R. Could the future taste Purple? Reclaiming mind, body, and cognition. In: Núñez R., and Freeman W.J. (Eds). Reclaiming cognition: The primacy of action, intention and emotion (1999), Imprint Academic, Thorverton, UK
24. Piaget J. Genetic epistemology (1971), W. W. Norton, New York
25. Rasmussen C., and King K. Locating starting points in differential equations: A realistic mathematics approach. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology 31 2 (2000) 161-172
26. Rasmussen C., Kwon O., Allen K., Marrongelle K., and Burtch M. Capitalizing on advances in K-12 mathematics education in undergraduate mathematics: An inquiry-oriented approach to differential equations. Asia Pacific Education Review (2006)
27. Rasmussen C., and Marrongelle K. Pedagogical content tools: Integrating student reasoning and mathematics into instruction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 37 5 (2006) 388-420
28. Rasmussen C., Yackel E., and King K. Social and sociomathematical norms in the mathematics classroom. In: Schoen H., and Charles R. (Eds). Teaching mathematics through problem solving: Grades 6-12 (2003), National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, VA 143-154
29. Saldanha L., and Thompson P.W. Re-thinking co-variations from a quantitative perspective: Simultaneous continuous variation. In: Berenson S.B., and Coulomb W.N. (Eds). Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Psychology of Mathematics Education-North America (1998), North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC
30. Schwartz J. Referent preserving and referent transforming quantities. In: Hiebert J., and Behr M. (Eds). Number concepts and operations in the middle school (1988) 127-174 Reston, VA: NCTM and Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
31. Stephan M., and Rasmussen C. Classroom mathematical type of mathematical activity in differential equations. Journal of Mathematical Behavior 21 (2002) 459-490
32. Stroup W. Understanding qualitative calculus: A structural synthesis of learning research. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning 7 (2002) 167-215
33. Talmy L. Fictive motion in language and 'ception'. In: Bloom P., Peterson M.A., Nadel L., and Garrett M.F. (Eds). Language and space (1996), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 211-276
34. Thompson P. The development of the concept of speed and its relationship to concepts of rate. In: Harel G., and Confrey J. (Eds). The development of multiplicative reasoning in the learning of mathematics (1994), State University of New York Press, New York 181-236
35. Thompson P.W., and Thompson A.G. Talking about rates conceptually, part I: A teacher's struggle. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 25 (1994) 279-303
36. Zandieh M. A theoretical framework for analyzing student understanding of the concept of derivative. In: Dubinsky E., Schoenfeld A.H., and Kaput J. (Eds). Research in collegiate mathematics education IV (2000), American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI 103-127