Recognizing textual entailment using a subsequence kernel method

Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Volumn 1, Issue , 2007, Pages 937-942

  Rui, Wang ^a   Neumann, Günter ^a  

^a GERMAN RESEARCH CENTER FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE DFKI   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABSTRACTING; CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); DATA STRUCTURES; FEATURE EXTRACTION; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; TREES (MATHEMATICS);

INFORMATION EXTRACTION; SYNTACTIC DEPENDENCY TREES;

CHARACTER RECOGNITION;

EID: 36348978044     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Bar-Haim, R., Dagan, I., Dolan, B., Ferro, L., Giampiccolo, D., Magnini, B. and Szpektor, 1. 2006. The Second PASCAL Recognising Textual Entailment Challenge. In Proc. of the PASCAL RTE-2 Challenge, pp1-9.
2. Bos, J. and Markert, K. 2005. Combining Shallow and Deep NLP Methods for Recognizing Textual Entailment. In Proc. of the PASCAL RTE Challenge, pp65-68.
3. Bunescu, R. and Mooney, R. 2006. Subsequence Kernels for Relation Extraction. In Proc. of the 19th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems.
4. Burger, J. and Ferro, L. 2005. Generating an Entailment Corpus from News Headlines. In Proc. of the ACL Workshop on Empirical Modeling of Semantic Equivalence and Entailment, pp49-54.
5. Corley, C. and Mihalcea, R. 2005. Measuring the Semantic Similarity of Texts. In Proc. of the ACL Workshop on Empirical Modeling of Semantic Equivalence and Entailment, pp 13-18.
6. de Salvo Braz, R., Girju, R., Punyaka-nok, V., Roth, D., and Sammons, M. 2005. An Inference Model for Semantic Entailment in Natural Language. In Proc. of the PASCAL RTE Challenge, pp29-32.
7. Glickman, O., Dagan, I., and Koppel, M. 2005. Web based Probabilistic Textual Entailment. In Proc. of the PASCAL RTE Challenge, pp33-36.
8. Hickl, A., Williams, J., Bensley, J., Roberts, K., Rink, B. and Shi, Y. 2006. Recognizing Textual Entailment with LCCs GROUNDHOG System. In Proc. of the PASCAL RTE-2 Challenge, pp80-85.
9. Kouylekov, M. and Magnini, B. 2006. Tree Edit Distance for Recognizing Textual Entailment: Estimating the Cost of Insertion. In Proc. of the PASCAL RTE-2 Challenge, pp68-73.
10. Lin, D. 1998. Dependency-based Evaluation of MINIPAR. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Evaluation of Parsing Systems at LREC 1998.
11. Roth, D. and Yih, W. 2004. A linear programming formulation for global inference in natural language tasks. In Proc. of the 8th Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, pp1-8.
12. Tatu, M., Iles, B., Slavik, J., Novischi, A. and Moldovan, D. 2006. COGEX at the Second Recognizing Textual Entailment Challenge. In Proc. of the PASCAL RTE-2 Challenge, pp 104-109.
13. Witten, I. H. and Frank, E. 1999. Weka: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques with Java Implementations. Morgan Kaufmann.
14. Zanzotto, F.M. and Moschitti, A. 2006. Automatic Learning of Textual Entailments with Cross-pair Similarities. In Proc. of ACL2006, pp401-408.