|
Volumn 107, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 595-596
|
Letter to the Editor concerning Petignat et al.'s Are self-collected samples comparable to physician-collected cervical specimens for human papillomavirus DNA testing? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gynecol Oncol 2007;105(2): 530-535
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
DNA;
CANCER DIAGNOSIS;
CANCER SCREENING;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
DIAGNOSTIC TEST;
DNA DETERMINATION;
HUMAN;
HUMAN PAPILLOMAVIRUS TYPE 16;
HUMAN PAPILLOMAVIRUS TYPE 52;
LETTER;
META ANALYSIS;
PHYSICIAN;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
SELF EVALUATION;
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;
UTERINE CERVIX CANCER;
UTERINE CERVIX CYTOLOGY;
VIRUS DETECTION;
VIRUS INFECTION;
WART VIRUS;
CERVIX UTERI;
DNA, VIRAL;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
PAPILLOMAVIRIDAE;
PAPILLOMAVIRUS INFECTIONS;
SELF-EXAMINATION;
SPECIMEN HANDLING;
VAGINAL SMEARS;
|
EID: 36348972300
PISSN: 00908258
EISSN: 10956859
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.08.068 Document Type: Letter |
Times cited : (3)
|
References (6)
|