Measures of Physical Functioning Predict Self-Reported Performance in Self-Care, Mobility, and Domestic Life in Ambulatory Persons With Multiple Sclerosis

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Volumn 88, Issue 12, 2007, Pages 1649-1657

  Paltamaa, Jaana ^a,b   Sarasoja, Taneli ^a   Leskinen, Esko ^b   Wikström, Juhani ^c   Mälkiä, Esko ^b  

^a Central Hospital   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ   (Finland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

Activities of daily living; Cross sectional studies; Multiple sclerosis; Odds ratio; Outcome assessment (health care); Physical therapy (specialty); Rehabilitation

Indexed keywords

IMMUNOMODULATING AGENT;

ADULT; AGED; AMBULATORY CARE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL FEATURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DEPRESSION; DISEASE DURATION; EXPANDED DISABILITY STATUS SCALE; FATIGUE; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF FUNCTIONING, DISABILITY AND HEALTH; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; PATIENT MOBILITY; REHABILITATION CARE; SELF CARE; SELF REPORT; VELOCITY; WALKING;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADULT; AGED; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; QUESTIONNAIRES; SELF CARE;

EID: 36348969327     PISSN: 00039993     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.07.032     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Kesselring J., and Beer S. Symptomatic therapy and neurorehabilitation in multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurol 4 (2005) 643-652
2. de Groot V., Beckerman H., Lankhorst G.J., Polman C.H., and Bouter L.M. The initial course of daily functioning in multiple sclerosis: a three-year follow-up study. Mult Scler 11 (2005) 713-718
3. Finlayson M., Winkler Impey M., Nicolle C., and Edwards J. Self-care, productivity and leisure limitations of people with multiple sclerosis in Manitoba. Can J Occup Ther 65 (1998) 299-308
4. Gulick E.E. Symptom and activities of daily living trajectory in multiple sclerosis: a 10-year study. Nurs Res 47 (1998) 137-146
5. Månsson E., and Lexell J. Performance in activities of daily living in multiple sclerosis. Disabil Rehabil 26 (2004) 576-585
6. McDonnell G.V., and Hawkins S.A. An assessment of the spectrum of disability and handicap in multiple sclerosis: a population-based study. Mult Scler 7 (2001) 111-117
7. Einarsson U., Gottberg K., Fredrikson S., von Koch L., and Widén Holmqvist L. Activities of daily living and social activities in people with multiple sclerosis in Stockholm County. Clin Rehabil 20 (2006) 543-551
8. Paltamaa J., Sarasoja T., Wikström J., and Mälkiä E. Physical functioning in subjects with multiple sclerosis: a population-based study in Central Finland. J Rehabil Med 38 (2006) 339-345
9. LaBan M.M., Martin T., Pechur J., and Sarnacki S. Physical and occupational therapy in the treatment of patients with multiple sclerosis. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 9 (1998) 603-614
10. Hobart J.C., Lamping D.L., Fitzpatrick R., Riazi A., and Thompson A.J. The multiple sclerosis impact scale (MSIS-29): a new patient-based outcome measure. Brain 124 (2001) 962-973
11. Finlayson M., Guglielmello L., and Liefer K. Describing and predicting the possession of assistive devices among persons with multiple sclerosis. Am J Occup Ther 55 (2001) 545-551
12. Freeman J.A. Improving mobility and functional independence in persons with multiple sclerosis. J Neurol 248 (2001) 255-259
13. Goverover Y., Kalmar J., Gaudino-Goering E., et al. The relation between subjective and objective measures of every-day activities in persons with multiple sclerosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 86 (2005) 2303-2308
14. Finlayson M.L., Peterson E.W., and Cho C.C. Risk factors for falling among people aged 45 to 90 years with multiple sclerosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 87 (2006) 1274-1279
15. Hakim E.A., Bakheit A.M., Bryant T.N., et al. The social impact of multiple sclerosis-a study of 305 patients and their relatives. Disabil Rehabil 22 (2000) 288-293
16. Coster W.J., Haley S.M., Andres P.L., Ludlow L.H., Bond T.L., and Ni P.S. Refining the conceptual basis for rehabilitation outcome measurement: personal care and instrumental activities domain. Med Care 42 Suppl 1 (2004) 62-72
17. World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health (2001), WHO, Geneva
18. Jette A.M. Introduction: physical disability. Phys Ther 74 (1994) 379-386
19. Sarasoja T., Wikström J., Paltamaa J., Hakama M., and Sumelahti M.L. Occurrence of multiple sclerosis in central Finland: a regional and temporal comparison during 30 years. Acta Neurol Scand 110 (2004) 331-336
20. Paltamaa J., West H., Sarasoja T., Wikström J., and Mälkiä E. Reliability of physical functioning measures in ambulatory subjects with multiple sclerosis. [published erratum in: Physiother Res Int 2006;11:123]. Physiother Res Int 10 (2005) 93-109
21. Kutzke J.F. Rating neurological impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology 33 (1983) 1444-1452
22. Multiple Sclerosis Council for Clinical Practice Guidelines. Fatigue and multiple sclerosis: evidence-based management strategies for fatigue in multiple sclerosis (1998), Paralyzed Veterans of America, Washington (DC) 1-33
23. Radloff L.S. The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas 1 (1977) 385-401
24. Jette A.M., Davies A.R., Cleary P.D., et al. The Functional Status Questionnaire: reliability and validity when used in primary care. J Gen Intern Med 1 (1986) 143-149
25. Murphy N., Confavreux C., Haas J., et al. Quality of life in multiple sclerosis in France, Germany, and the United Kingdom. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 65 (1998) 460-466
26. Cleary P.D., and Jette A.M. Reliability and validity of the Functional Status Questionnaire. Qual Life Res 9 (2000) 747-753
27. Mathiowetz V., Volland G., Kashman N., and Weber K. Adult norms for Box and Block Test for manual dexterity. Am J Occup Ther 39 (1985) 386-391
28. Flachenecker P., Kümpfel T., Kallmann B., et al. Fatigue in multiple sclerosis: a comparison of different rating scales and correlation to clinical parameters. Mult Scler 8 (2002) 523-526
29. Finger M.E., Cieza A., Stoll J., Stucki G., and Huber E.O. Identification of intervention categories for physical therapy, based on the international classification of functioning. Disability and health: a Delphi exercise. Phys Ther 86 (2006) 1203-1220
30. Beatty W.W., Blanco C.R., Wilbanks S.L., Paul R.H., and Hames K.A. Demographic, clinical, and cognitive characteristics of multiple sclerosis patients who continue to work. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 9 (1995) 167-173
31. Rao S.M., Leo G.J., Ellington L., Nauertz T., Bernardin L., and Unverzagt F. Cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. II. Impact on employment and social functioning. Neurology 41 (1991) 692-696
32. Kessler H.R., Cohen R.A., and Lauer K. The relationship between disability and memory dysfunction. J Neurosci 62 (1992) 17-34
33. Confavreux C., Vukusic S., and Adeleine P. Early clinical predictors and progression of irreversible disability in multiple sclerosis: an amnesic process. Brain 126 (2003) 770-782
34. Provinciali L., Ceravolo M.G., Bartolini M., Logullo F., and Danni M. A multidimensional assessment of multiple sclerosis: relationships between disability domains. Acta Neur Scand 100 (1999) 156-162
35. DiLorenzo T., Halper J., and Picone M.A. Comparison of older and younger individuals with multiple sclerosis: a preliminary investigation. Rehabil Psychol 49 (2004) 123-125
36. Duran L., and Fisher A.G. Male and female performance on the assessment of motor and process skills. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 77 (1996) 1019-1024
37. Iezzoni L.I. Risk adjusting rehabilitation outcomes: an overview of methodologic issues. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 83 (2004) 316-326
38. Sayer A., Syddall H., Martin H., Dennison E., Roberts H., and Cooper C. Is grip strength associated with health-related quality of life?. Finding from the Hertfordshire Cohort Study. Age Ageing 35 (2006) 409-415
39. Chan A., and Heck C.S. Mobility in multiple sclerosis: more than just a physical problem. Int J MS Care 3 (2000) 35-40
40. Neill J., Belan I., and Reid K. Effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions for fatigue in adults with multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, or systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review. J Adv Nurs 56 (2006) 617-635
41. Gottberg K., Einarsson U., Fredrikson S., von Koch L., and Widén Holmqvist L. A population-based study of depressive symptoms in multiple sclerosis in Stockholm County. Association with functioning and sense of coherence. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 78 (2007) 60-65