Gender-sensitive automated negotiators

Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Volumn 1, Issue , 2007, Pages 821-826

  Katz, Ron ^a   Kraus, Sarit ^a  

^a BAR ILAN UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA ACQUISITION; DATABASE SYSTEMS; LEARNING ALGORITHMS;

AUTOMATED NEGOTIATORS; GENDER BASED SEPARATION;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

EID: 36348958451     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Billari, F., and Prskawetz, A. 2003. Agent-Based Computational Demography: Using Simulation to Improve Our Understanding of Demographic Behaviour. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.
2. Boff, E.; Reategui, E.; and Viccari, R. 2005. An affective based virtual character for learning environments. In AI-ED Workshop on motivation and affect in educational software.
3. Carter, J., and Irons, M. 1991. Are economists different, and if so, why? Journal of Economic Perspectives 5:171-177.
4. Davidson, A.; Billings, D.; Schaeffer, J.; and Szafron, D. 2000. Improved opponent modeling in poker. In IC-AI'2000, 1467-1473.
5. Erev, I., and Roth, A. 1998. Predicting how people play games: Reinforcement learning in experimental games with unique, mixed strategy equilibrium. Amer. Econ. Rev. 88(4):848881.
6. Guth, W., and Huck, S. 1997. From ultimatum bargaining to dictatorship - an experimental study of four games varying in veto power. Metroeconomica 48(3):262-279.
7. Guth, W.; Schmittberger, R.; and Schwarz, B. 1982. An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 3:367-388.
8. Katz, R., and Kraus, S. 2006. Efficient agents for cliff-edge environments with a large set of decision options. In AAMAS'06.
9. Krishna, V., and Morgan, J. 1997. An analysis of the war of attrition and the all-pay auction. J. Econ. Theory 72:343-362.
10. Krulwich, B. 1997. Lifestyle finder: Intelligent user profiling using large-scale demographic data. AI Magazine 18(2):37-45.
11. Ockenfels, A., and Selten, R. 2005. Impulse balance equilibrium and feedback in first price auctions. Games Econ. Behav. 51(1):155-170.
12. Rubin, J. Z., and Brown, B. R. 1975. Bargainers as individuals. In The social psychology of bargaining and negotiation. New York: Academic Press. 157-196.
13. Savicki, V., and Kelley, M. 2000. Computer mediated communication: Gender and group communication. CyberPsychology and Behavior 3(5):817-826.
14. Solnick, S., and Schweitzer, M. 1999. The influence of physical attractiveness and gender on ultimatum game decisions. Organ. Behav. Hum. Dec. 79(3): 199-215.
15. Tesfatsion, L. 2001. Special issue of agent-based computational economics. J. econ. dyn. control 25:281-654.
16. Vreind, N. 1997. Will reasoning improve learning? Econ. Lett. 55(1):9-18.
17. Walters, A.; Stuhlmacher, A.; and Meyer, L. 1998. Gender and negotiator competitiveness: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 76(1):1-29.