A predictor-corrector algorithm for reaction-diffusion equations associated with neural activity on branched structures

SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing

Volumn 28, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 2139-2161

  Rempe, M J ^a   Chopp, D L ^a  

^a Northwestern University   (United States)

Author keywords

Finite difference methods; Neural biology; Reaction diffusion equation

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; DIFFUSION; FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD; NEURAL NETWORKS; NUMERICAL METHODS; ONE DIMENSIONAL;

BRANCHED STRUCTURES; MODEL EQUATIONS; NEURAL BIOLOGY; REACTION-DIFFUSION EQUATION;

NEURONS;

EID: 36348956828     PISSN: 10648275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1137/050643210     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. J. BOWER AND D. BEEMAN, The Book of Genesis: Exploring Realistic Neural Models with the GEneral NEural Simulation System, Telos, Santa Clara, CA, 1998.
2. Y. CAI, E. WALSH, AND J. MCGEE, A simple program for simulating the responses of neurons with arbitrarily structured and active dendritic trees, J. Neurosci. Methods, 74 (1997), pp. 27-35.
3. J. COOLEY AND F. DODGE, Digital computer solutions for excitation and propagation of the nerve impulse, Biophys. J., 6 (1966), pp. 583-599.
4. J. CRANK AND P. NICHOSON, A practical method for numerical evaluation of solutions of partial differential equations of the heat-conduction type, Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc., 43 (1947), pp. 50-67.
5. N. GOLDING, W.L. KATH, AND N. SPRUSTON, Dichotomy of action-potential backpropagation in CA1 pyramidal neuron dendrites, J. Neurophysiol., 86 (2001), pp. 2998-3010.
6. M. HINES, Efficient computation of branched nerve equations, Int. J. Bio-Med. Comput., 15 (1984), pp. 69-76.
7. M. HINES AND N. CARNEVALE, The NEURON simulation environment, Neural Computation, 9 (1997), pp. 1179-1209.
8. M. HINES AND N. CARNEVALE, Neuron: A tool for neuroscientists, The Neuroscientist, 7 (2001), pp. 123-135.
9. M. HINES AND N. CARNEVALE, The NEURON simulation environment, in The Handbook of Brain Theory and Neural Networks, 2nd ed., MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2002, pp. 769-773.
10. A. HODGKIN AND A.F. HUXLEY, A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve, J. Physiol. London, 117 (1952), pp. 500-544.
11. M. MASCAGNI, The backward Euler method for numerical solution of the Hodgkin-Huxley equations of nerve conduction, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 27 (1990), pp. 941-962.
12. M. MASCAGNI, A parallelizing algorithm for computing solutions to arbitrarily branched cable neuron models, J. Neurosci. Methods, 36 (1991), pp. 105-114.
13. M. MASCAGNI AND A. SHERMAN, Numerical methods for neuronal modeling, in Methods of Neuronal Modeling: From Ions to Networks, 2nd ed., MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1996, pp. 569-606.
14. W. RALL, Theory of physiological properties of dendrites, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 96 (1962), pp. 1071-1092.
15. W. RALL, Theoretical significance of dendritic trees for input-output relations, in Neural Theory and Modeling, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, 1964, pp. 73-97.