On the benefits of exploiting underlying goals in argument-based negotiation

Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Volumn 1, Issue , 2007, Pages 116-121

  Rahwan, Iyad ^a,b   Pasquier, Philippe ^c   Sonenberg, Liz ^c   Dignum, Frank ^d  

^a THE BRITISH UNIVERSITY IN DUBAI   (United Arab Emirates)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^d UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FORMAL METHODS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; NETWORK PROTOCOLS;

BARGAINING; FORMAL ANALYSIS; INTEREST-BASED NEGOTIATION (IBN);

MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS;

EID: 36348950929     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (7)

1. Cox, J. S., and Durfee, E. 2003. Discovering and exploiting synergy between hierarchical planning agents. In Proc. AAMAS, 281-288. ACM Press.
2. Endris, U.; Maudet, N.; Sadri, F.; and Toni, F. 2006. Negotiating socially optimal allocations of resources. Journal of artificial intelligence research 25:315-348.
3. Erol, K.; Hendler, J.; and Nau, D. 1994. Semantics for hierarchical task network planning. Technical Report CS-TR-3239, UMIACS-TR-94-31, Department of Computer Science, University of Maryland.
4. Faratin, P.; Sierra, C.; and Jennings, N. R. 2002. Using similarity criteria to make trade-offs in automated negotiations. Artificial Intelligence 142(2):205-237.
5. Parsons, S.; Sierra, C.; and Jennings, N. 1998. Agents that reason and negotiate by arguing. Journal of Logic and Computation 8(3):261-292.
6. Rahwan, I.; Ramchurn, S. D.; Jennings, N. R.; McBurney, P.; Parsons, S.; and Sonenberg, L. 2003. Argumentation based negotiation. Knowledge Engineering Review 18(4):343-375.
7. Rahwan, I.; Sonenberg, L.; and Dignum, F. 2003. Towards interest-based negotiation. In Proc. AAMAS, 773-780. ACM Press.