Secondary uses of clinical data in primary care

Informatics in Primary Care

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 157-166

  Teasdale, Sheila ^a   Bates, David ^b   Kmetik, Karen ^c   Suzewits, Jeff ^d   Bainbridge, Mike ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b PARTNERS HEALTHCARE   (United States)

^c AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION   (United States)

^d SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Data quality; Primary care; Secondary uses of data

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; CLINICAL STUDY; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONFIDENTIALITY; GENERAL PRACTICE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; MEDICAL AUDIT; MEDICAL FEE; POINT OF CARE TESTING; PREVALENCE; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; SALARY; SYMPOSIUM; UNITED KINGDOM; UNITED STATES; UNIVERSITY; WRITING;

EID: 36348948562     PISSN: 14760320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14236/jhi.v15i3.654     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. www.connectingforhealth.nhs.uk/delivery/serviceimplementation/engagement/ gps/systems_of_choice/gpspec.pdf
2. Her Majesty's Stationery Office. National Health Service and Community Care Act 1990. London: HMSO, 1990. www.opsi.gov.uk/ACTS/ acts1990/Ukpga_19900019_en_1.htm
3. British Medical Association. The New GMS Contract 2003. www.bma.org.uk/ap.nsf/Content/NewGMS Contract
4. Department of Health. Information for Health. Leeds: Department of Health, 1998.
5. Department of Health. Building the Information Core: implementing the NHS Plan. Leeds: Department of Health, 2001.
6. Department of Health. Delivering 21st Century IT Support for the NHS: national strategic programme. Leeds: Department of Health, 2002.
7. Department of Health. National Service Framework for Diabetes. London: Department of Health, 2001.
8. www.icservices.nhs.uk/ncasp/pages/audit_topics/diabetes
9. Hippisley-Cox J, Pringle M, Crown N, Meal A and Wynn A. Sex inequalities in ischaemic heart disease in general practice: cross-sectional survey. British Medical Journal 2001;322:832-4.
10. Horsfield P and Teasdale S. Generating information from electronic patient records in general practice: a description of clinical care and gender inequalities in coronary heart disease using data from over two million patient records. Informatics in Primary Care 2003;11: 137-44.
11. www.immunisation.nhs.uk/article.php?id=448
12. www.hpa.org.uk/infections/topics_az
13. www.primarycarecontracting.nhs.uk/145.php
14. www.ic.nhs.uk/psu/services/QOF/
15. Greim JA, Housman D, Turchin A et al. The quality data warehouse: delivering answers on demand. AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings 2006:934.
16. Nalichowski R, Keogh D, Chueh H and Murphy SN. Calculating the benefits of a research patient data repository. AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings 2006: 1044.
17. Jha AK, Ferris TG, Donelan K et al. How common are electronic health records in the United States? A summary of the evidence. Health Affairs 2006;25:w496-w507.
18. American College of Cardiology, American Heart Association, Physician Consortium for Performance Improvement. Clinical Performance Measures: chronic stable coronary artery disease. Chicago IL: American Medical Association, 2003.
19. Persell SD, Wright JM, Thompson JA, Kmetik KS and Baker DW. Assessing the validity of national quality measures for coronary artery disease using an electronic health record. Archives of Internal Medicine 2006;166: 2272-7.
20. Baker DW, Persell SD, Thompson AJ et al. Automated review of electronic health records to assess quality of care for outpatients with heart failure. Annals of Internal Medicine 2007;146:270-7.
21. www.acgme.org/outcome/comp/compFull.asp
22. www.cdems.com/basics.html