Effects of structure and interaction style on distinct search tasks

Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Digital Libraries

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 442-451

  Capra, Robert ^a   Marchionini, Gary ^a   Oh, Jung Sun ^a   Stutzman, Fred ^a   Zhang, Yan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

Browsing; Facets; Information architecture; Usability

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION ARCHITECTURE; USABILITY;

INFORMATION ANALYSIS; QUERY LANGUAGES; USER INTERFACES; WEB BROWSERS;

SEARCH ENGINES;

EID: 36348948051     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1255175.1255267     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Ahlberg, C., Williamson, C., and Shneiderman, B. (1992). Dynamic queries for information exploration: An implementation and evaluation. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 619-626.
2. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
3. Efron, M., Elsas, J, Marchionini, G., and Zhang J. (2004). Machine learning for information architecture in a large governmental website. ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries 2004 (Tuscon, AZ, June 7-11, 2004), 151-159.
4. Geisler, G. (2003). AgileViews: A Framework for Creating More Effective Information Seeking Interfaces. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
5. Ghani, J. A, Supnick, R., & Rooney, P. (1991). The experience of flow in computer-mediated and in face-to-face groups. Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Information Systems (December 16-18, 1991, New York), 229-237.
6. Hearst, M. (2006). Clustering versus faceted categories for information exploration. CACM, 49(4), 59-61.
7. Karlson, A., Robertson, G., Robbins, D., Czerwinski, M. & Smith, G. FaThumb: A facet-based interface for mobile search. Proc. CHI 2006, ACM Press (2006), 711-720. NY: ACM Press.
8. Marchionini, G. (2006). Exploratory search: From finding to understanding. CACM, 49(4), 41-46.
9. Marchionini, G. and Brunk, B. (2003). Towards a general relation browser: A GUI for information architects. Journal of Digital Information, 4(1).
10. Marchionini, G. & Levi, M. (2003). Digital government services: The Bureau of Labor Statistics Case. Interactions: New visions of human-computer interaction, 10(4), July-August p. 18-27.
11. Pinto, D., McCallum, A., Wei, X., and Croft, W. B. 2003. Table extraction using conditional random fields. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual international ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in informaion Retrieval (Toronto, Canada, July 28 - August 01, 2003). SIGIR '03. ACM Press, New York, NY, 235-242.
12. Rosenfeld, L. & Morville, P. (2002). Information architecture for the World Wide Web. Sepastopol, CA: O'Reilly.
13. Shneiderman, B. (1994), Dynamic Queries for Visual Information Seeking, IEEE Software, 11(6): 70-77.
14. th Ed.). Boston: Addison-Wesley.
15. Vakkari, P. (1999). Task complexity, problem structure and information actions: Integrating studies on information seeking and retrieval. Information Processing and Management 35(6):819-837.
16. Woodruff, A., Rosenholtz, R., Morrison, J., Faulring, A., and Pirolli, P. (2002). A Comparison of the Use of Text Summaries, Plain Thumbnails, and Enhanced Thumbnails for Web Search Tasks. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(2):172-185.
17. Yee, K., Swearingen, K., Li, K., and Hearst, M. (2003). Faceted metadata for image search and browsing. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, USA, April 05 - 10, 2003). CHI '03. ACM Press, New York, NY, 401-408.
18. Zhang, J. and Marchionini, G. (2005). Evaluation and evolution of a browse and search interface: relation browser. In Proceedings of the 2005 National Conference on Digital Government Research (Atlanta, Georgia, May 15-18, 2005). ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, vol. 89. Digital Government Research Center, 179-188.