A revision-based approach to resolving conflicting information

Proceedings of the 21st Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, UAI 2005

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 477-484

  Qi, Guilin ^a   Liu, Weiru ^a   Bell, David A ^a  

^a QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY BELFAST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARDINALITIES; CONFLICT RESOLUTION; MODEL-BASED OPC; REVISION OPERATOR;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

EID: 36348944903     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. L. Amgoud and C. Cayrol (2002). Inferring from inconsistency in preference based argumentation frameworks, Int. J. of Automated Reasoning, 29,125-169.
2. S. Benferhat, C. Cayrol, D. Dubois, J. Lang, and H. Prade (1993). Inconsistency Management and Prioritized Syntax-Based Entailment, In Proc. of IJCAI'93, 640-647.
3. S. Benferhat, S. Kaci, D.L. Berre, and M.A. Williams (2004). Weakening conflicting information for interated revision and knowledge integration, Artificial Intelligence, 153, 339-371.
4. B. Bessant, E. Grégoire, P. Marquis, and L. Sais (2001). Iterated syntax-based revision in a nonmonotonic setting, M. A. Williams, H. Rott ed., Frontier in Belief Revision, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 369-391.
5. S. Coste-Marquis and P. Marquis (2000). Compiling stratified belief bases, Proc. of ECAI'00, 23-27.
6. M. Dalal (1988). Investigations into a theory of knowledge base revision: Preliminary report, Proc. of AAAI'88, 3-7.
7. T. Eiter and Georg Gottlob (1992). On the complexity of propositional knowledge base revision, updates, and counterfactuals, Artificial Intelligence, 57(2-3), 227-270. (Pubitemid 23586698)
8. P. Gärdenfors (1988). Knowledge in Flux-Modeling the Dynamic of Epistemic States. Mass.: MIT Press.
9. D. S. Johnson (1990). A catalog of complexity classes, J. van Leeuwen, ed., Handbook of Theoretical Computer Science, pp. 67-161.
10. 2 merging operators, Artificial Intelligence, 157(1-2), 49-79.
11. H. Katsuno and A.O. Mendelzon (1991). Propositional knowledge base revision and minimal change, Artificial Intelligence, 52(3), 263-294.
12. K. Tanaka (2005). The AGM theory and inconsistent belief change, Logique et Analyse, to appear.
13. B. Nebel (1991). Belief revision and default reasoning: Syntax-based approaches, Proc. of KR'91, 417-428.
14. B. Nebel (1998). How hard is it to revise belief base, D. Dubois, H. Prade (eds.), Handbook of Defeasible Reasoning and Uncertainty Management Systems, vol. 3: Belief Change, Kluwer Academic, 77-145.
15. A. Nittka (2004). An Algorithm for Knowledge Base Extraction, Proc. of ECAI'04, 863-867.
16. G. Priest (2001). Paraconsistent belief revision, Theoria, 67, 214-228.
17. M-A. Williams (1994). Transmutations of knowledge systems, Proc. of KR'94, 619-629.
18. M-A. Williams (1996). A practical approach to belief revision: reason-based change, Proc. KR'96, 412-421.