The effects of temperament and character on the choice of contraceptive methods

European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 378-384

  Aker, Servet ^a   Boke, Omer ^a   Dundar, Cihad ^a   Peksen, Yildiz ^a  

^a ONDOKUZ MAYIS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Character; Choice of contraceptive method; Contraception; Temperament; Temperament and character inventory

Indexed keywords

LEVONORGESTREL; ORAL CONTRACEPTIVE AGENT;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CHARACTER STATE; CONDOM; CONTRACEPTION; DRUG SAFETY; HUMAN; INTRAUTERINE CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE; ORAL CONTRACEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STUDENT; TEMPERAMENT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CHARACTER; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; CONTRACEPTION; CONTRACEPTIVE AGENTS; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; QUESTIONNAIRES; STUDENTS, NURSING; TEMPERAMENT; TURKEY; UNIVERSITIES;

EID: 36348944742     PISSN: 13625187     EISSN: 14730782     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13625180701393561     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Fathalla MF. Reproductive health in world: Two decades of progress and the challenge ahead. In Khanna J, van Look PFA and Griffin PD, eds, Reproductive health: A key to a brighter future. Biennial report 1990-1991, special 20th anniversary issue. Geneva: World Health Organization 1992:3-32.
2. Hatcher RA, Kowal D, Guest F, et al. Contraceptive technology: International edition. New York: Irvington Publishers 1989.
3. Hatcher RA, Rinehart W, Blackburn F, et al. The essentials of contraceptive technology. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Population Information Program 1997:4-5.
4. Arkar H. Cloninger'in psikobiyolojik kişilik kurami. Türk Psikoloji Bülteni 2005;11:82-94.
5. Köse S. A psychobiological model of temperament and character: TCI. Yeni Symposium 2003;41:86-97.
6. Boz C, Sayar K, Velioǧlu S, et al. Temperament and character profile of patients with chronic tension-type headache. Turk Psikiyatri Derg 2004;15:105-11.
7. Köse S, Sayar K, Kalelioǧlu Ü, et al. Mizaç ve karakter envanteri (Türkçe TCI): geçerlik, güvenirliǧi ve faktör yapisi. Klinik Psikofarmakoloji Bülteni 2004;14:107-31.
8. Arkar H, Sorias O, Tunca Z, et al. Factorial structure, validity, and reliability of the Turkish temperament and character inventory. Turk Psikiyatri Derg 2005;16:190-204.
9. Cloninger CR, Svrakic DM, Przybeck TR. A psychobiological model of temperament and character. Arch Gen Psychiatr 1993;50:975-90.
10. Cloninger CR, Przybeck TR, Svrakic DM, et al. The Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI): A guide to its development and use. St Louis, Missouri: Center for the Psychobiology of Personality 1994.
11. Oddens BJ. Determinants of contraceptive use among women of reproductive age in Great Britain and Germany II : psychological factors. J Biosoc Sci 1997;29:437-70.
12. Turkish Population and Health Survey 2003. Ankara Ministry of Health (Turkey) and Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies 2004:61-80.
13. Dündar C, Kaynar Tunçel E, et al. Samsun ili merkez saǧlik ocaklarinda çalişan evli ebelerin aile planlamasi yöntemi kullanma durumlari. İnönü Üniversitesi Tip Fakültesi Dergisi 2005;12:243-6.
14. Özkan S, Maral I, Bumin MA. Kadin saǧlik personelinin kullandiǧi aile planlamasi Yöntemleri. Sǎglik ve Toplum 1998;8:14-17.
15. Uskun E, Öztürk M, Kişioǧlu AN, et al. Isparta'da çalişan kadinlarin kontraseptif kullanimi ve bu durumu etkileyen faktörler. Saǧlik ve Toplum 2001;11:56-61.
16. Uygur D, Erdinç AS, Tuncer R. Educational level of women does not reflect their contraceptive preferences. Gynecol Obstet Reprod Med 2001;8:101-4.
17. Kulczycki A. The determinants of withdrawal use in Turkey: a husband's imposition or a woman's choice? Soc Sci Med 2004;59:1019-33.
18. Lamvu G, Steiner MJ, Condon S, Hartmann K. Consistency between the most important reasons for using contraception and current method used: the influence of health care providers. Contraception 2006;73:399-403.
19. Lagana L. Psychosocial correlates of contraceptive practices during late adolescence. Adolescence 1999;34:463-83.
20. Kutner J, Duffy T. A psychological analysis of oral contraceptives and the intrauterine device. Contraception 1970;2:289-96.
21. Dündar C, Süren C, Ordulu F, et al. Samsun kent merkezinde 15-49 yaş evli kadinlarin aile planlamasi yöntemleri kullanma durumu ve etkileyen faktörler. 8. Ulusal Halk Saǧliǧi Kongresi Kongre Kitabi 2003,1:163-6.
22. Üner A, Keleş M, Kazancioǧlu TA. Aile planlamasi anket çalişmasi. Haseki Tip Bülteni 2000;38:19-25.
23. Grandy WR, Klepinger DH, Nelson Wally A. Contraceptive characteristics: The perceptions and priorities of men and women. Fam Plann Perspect 1999;31:168-75.
24. Lodewijckx E. Attitudes towards contraception and some reasons for discontinuation. Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris) 1987;15:1025-30.
25. Leridon H. Advantages and disadvantages of each contraceptive method. Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris) 1986;14:1007-11.