Location memory biases reveal the challenges of coordinating visual and kinesthetic reference frames

Experimental Brain Research

Volumn 184, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 165-178

  Simmering, Vanessa R ^a   Peterson, Clayton ^b   Darling, Warren ^b   Spencer, John P ^a,b  

^a University of Iowa   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

Coordinate transformations; Memory; Proprioception; Reference frames; Vision

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HAND MOVEMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; KINEMATICS; KINESTHESIA; MALE; MEMORY; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROPRIOCEPTION; VISION; VISUOMOTOR COORDINATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM; FEMALE; HUMANS; KINESTHESIS; MALE; MEMORY; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; OBSERVER VARIATION; ORIENTATION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PROPRIOCEPTION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SPACE PERCEPTION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 36348941038     PISSN: 00144819     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-007-1089-7     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Biguer B, Donaldson IML, Hein A, Jeannerod M (1988) Neck muscle vibration modifies the urepresentation of visual motion and direction in man. Brain 111:1405-1439
2. Chapman CD, Heath MD, Westwood DA, Roy EA (2001) Memory for kinesthetically defined target location: evidence for manual asymmetries. Brain Cogn 46:62-66
3. Darling WG, Bartelt R (2005) The visual perception coordinate system uses axes defined by the Earth, trunk, and vision. Perception 34:17-30
4. Darling WG, Hodzinski JM (1999) Kinesthetic perceptions of earth- and body- fixed axes. Exp Brain Res 126:417-430
5. Darling WG, Miller GF (1993) Transformations between visual and kinesthetic coordinate systems in reaches to remembered object locations and orientations. Exp Brain Res 93:534-547
6. Engebretson PH, Huttenlocher J (1996) Bias in spatial location due to categorization: Comment on Tversky and Schiano. J Exp Psychol General 125:96-108
7. Gallistel CR (1990) The organization of learning. MIT, Cambridge
8. Ghilardi MF, Gordon J, Ghez C (1995) Learning a visuomotor transformation in a local area of work space produces directional biases in other areas. J Neurophysiol 73:2535-2539
9. Huttenlocher J, Hedges LV, Duncan S (1991) Categories and particulars: prototype effects in estimating spatial location. Psychol Rev 98:352-376
10. Karnath H-O, Reich E, Rorden C, Fetter M, Driver J (2002) The perception of body orientation after neck-proprioceptive stimulation. Exp Brain Res 143:350-358
11. Lemay M, Stelmach GE (2005) Multiple frames of reference for pointing to a remembered target. Exp Brain Res 164:301-310
12. McIntyre J, Stratta F, Lacquaniti F (1997) Viewer-centered frame of reference for pointing to memorized targets in three-dimensional space. J Neurophysiol 78:1601-1618
13. McIntyre J, Stratta F, Lacquaniti F (1998) Short-term memory for reaching to visual targets: psychophysical evidence for body-centered reference frames. J Neurosci 18:8423-8435
14. Nelson TO, Chaiklin S (1980) Immediate memory for spatial location. J Exp Psychol Hum Learn Memory 6:529-545
15. Newcombe NS, Huttenlocher J (2000) Making space: the development of spatial representation and reasoning. MIT, Cambridge
16. Palmer SE, Hemenway K (1978) Orientation and symmetry: Effects of multiple, rotational, and near symmetries. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 4:691-702
17. Sainburg RL, Lateiner JE, Latash ML, Bagesteiro LB (2003) Effects of altering initial position on movement direction and extent. J Neurophysiol 89:401-415
18. Schutte AR, Spencer JP (2007) Planning "discrete" movements using a continuous system: Insights from a dynamic field theory of movement preparation. Motor Control 11:166-208
19. Simmering VR, Spencer JP (2007) Carving up space at imaginary joints: Can people mentally impose spatial category boundaries? J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 33:871-894
20. Simmering VR, Spencer JP, Schöner G (2006) Reference-related inhibition produces enhanced position discrimination and fast repulsion near axes of symmetry. Percept Psychophys 68:1027-1046
21. Soechting JF, Flanders M (1989a) Errors in pointing are due to approximations in sensorimotor transformations. J Neurophysiol 62:595-608
22. Soechting JF, Flanders M (1989b) Sensorimotor representations for pointing to targets in three-dimensional space. J Neurophysiol 62:582-594
23. Spencer JP, Hund AM (2002) Prototypes and particulars: Geometric and experience-dependent spatial categories. J Exp Psychol General 131:16-37
24. Spencer JP, Simmering VR, Schutte AR (2006) Toward a formal theory of flexible spatial behavior: geometric category biases generalize across pointing and verbal response types. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 32:473-490
25. Spencer JP, Simmering VR, Schutte AR, Schöner G (2007) What does theoretical neuroscience have to offer the study of behavioral development? Insights from a dynamic field theory of spatial cognition. In: Plumert JM, Spencer JP (eds) The emerging spatial mind. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 320-361
26. Tversky B, Schiano DJ (1989) Perceptual and conceptual factors in distortions in memory for graphs and maps. J Exp Psychol General 118:387-398
27. van Beers RJ, Sittig AC, van der Gon JJD (1998) The precision of proprioceptive position sense. Exp Brain Res 122:367-377
28. Wang J, Sainburg RL (2005) Adaptation to visuomotor rotations remaps movement vectors, not final positions. J Neurosci 25:4024-4030
29. Wenderoth P, van der Zwan R (1991) Local and global mechanisms of one- and two-dimensional orientation illusions. Percept Psychophys 50:321-332