Forensic automatic speaker classification in the "coming paradigm shift"

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 4343 LNAI, Issue , 2007, Pages 205-217

  Gonzalez Rodriguez, Joaquin ^a   Ramos, Daniel ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

Calibration; Daubert rules; DNA; Forensic; Likelihood ratio; Paradigm shift; Speaker classification

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN NETWORKS; DNA; NETWORK PROTOCOLS; SPEECH RECOGNITION; STANDARDIZATION;

FORENSIC SCIENCE; LIKELIHOOD RATIOS (LR); PARADIGM SHIFT; PROFICIENCY TESTING; SCIENTIFIC EVALUATION; SPEAKER CLASSIFICATION;

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION);

EID: 36249009183     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-74200-5_11     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Saks, M.J., Koehler, J.J.: The coming paradigm shift in forensic identification science. Science 309, 892-895 (2005)
2. Cole, S.A.: A history of fingerprinting and criminal identification (2005), Available at http://www.nasonline.org/site/PageServer?pagename=sackler. forensic-presentations
3. Champod, C., Evett, I.W.: A probabilistic approach to fingerprint evidence. Journal of Forensic Identification 51, 101-122 (2001)
4. Court, U.S.: Daubert v. Merrel Dow Pharmaceuticals [509 U.S. 579] (2003)
5. Evett, I.W.: Towards a uniform framework for reporting opinions in forensic science casework. Science and Justice 38, 198-202 (1998)
6. Heath, D., Bemton, H.: Portland lawyer released in probe of Spanish bombings. Seattle Times (May 21, 2004), Available at http://www.law.asu.edu/?id- 8857
7. Rose, P.: Technical forensic speaker recognition: Evaluation, types and testing of evidence. Computer Speech and Language 20, 159-191 (2006)
8. Ramos-Castro, D., Gonzalez-Rodriguez, J., Ortega-Garcia, J.: Likelihood ratio calibration in transparent and testable forensic speaker recognition. In: Proc. of Odyssey (2006)
9. Aitken, C.G.G., Taroni, F.: Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (2004)
10. Campbell, W.M., Reynolds, D.A., Campbell, J.P., Brady, K.J.: Estimating and evaluating confidence for forensic speaker recognition. In: Proc. of ICASSP, pp. 717-720 (2005)
11. Gonzalez-Rodriguez, J., Drygajlo, A., Ramos-Castro, D., Garcia-Gomar, M., Ortega-Garcia, J.: Robust estimation, interpretation and assessment of likelihood ratios in forensic speaker recognition. Computer Speech and Language 20, 331-355 (2006)
12. Jessen, M.: Speaker classification in forensic phonetics and acoustics. In: Müller, C. (ed.) Speaker Classification I. LNCS(LNCS), vol. 4343, Springer, Heidelberg (2007) (this issue)
13. de Groot, M.H., Fienberg, S.E.: The comparison and evaluation of forecasters. The Statistician 32, 12-22 (1982)
14. Brummer, N., du Preez, J.: Application independent evaluation of speaker detection. Computer Speech and Language 20, 230-275 (2006)
15. van Leeuwen, D., Brummer, N.: An introduction to application-independent evaluation of speaker recognition systems (this issue). In: Müller, C. (ed.) Speaker Classification I. LNCS(LNAI), vol. 4343, Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
16. Cole, S.A.: More than zero: Accounting for error in latent fingerprint identification. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology 95, 985-1078 (2005)
17. Champod, C., Meuwly, D.: The inference of identity in forensic speaker recognition. Speech Communication 31, 193-203 (2000)
18. Meuwly, D.: Reconaissance de Locuteurs en Sciences Forensiques: L'apport d'une Approache Automatique. Ph.D. thesis, IPSC-Universite de Lausanne (2001)
19. Taroni, F., Bozza, S., Aitken, C.G.G.: Decision analysis in forensic science. Journal of Forensic Sciences 50, 894-905 (2005)
20. Taroni, F., Aitken, C.G.G., Garbolino, P.: De Finetti's subjectivism, the assessment of probabilities and the evaluation of evidence: A commentary for forensic scientists. Science and Justice 41, 145-150 (2001)
21. Curran, J.: Forensic Applications of Bayesian Inference to Glass Evidence. University of Waikato, New Zealand (1997)
22. van Leeuwen, D., Martin, A., Przybocki, M., Bouten, J.: The NIST 2004 and TNO/NFI speaker recognition evaluations. Computer Speech and Language 20, 128-158 (2006)
23. NIST: NIST speech group website: http://www.nist.gov/speech
24. Brummer, N.: (Focal toolkit) Available at http://www.dsp.sun.ac.za/ ~nbrummer/focal/
25. Campbell, W.M., Sturim, D.E., Reynolds, D.A.: Support vector machines using GMM supervectors for speaker verification. Signal Processing Letters 13(5), 308-311 (2006)
26. Botti, F., Alexander, A., Drygajlo, A.: An interpretation framework for the evaluation of evidence in forensic automatic speaker recognition with limited suspect data. In: Proc. of Odyssey, pp. 63-68 (2004)
27. Ramos-Castro, D., Gonzalez-Rodriguez, J., Montero-Asenjo, A., Ortega-Garcia, J.: Suspect-adapted MAP estimation of within-source distributions in generative likelihood ratio estimation. In: Proc. of Odyssey (2006)