Post-internationalism and IR theory

Millennium: Journal of International Studies

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 529-549

  Ferguson, Yale H ^a   Mansbach, Richard W ^b  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 36249007595     PISSN: 03058298     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/03058298070350031001     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. E. H. Carr, The Twenty Years' Crisis 1919-1939: An Introduction to the Study of Intgernational Relations, 2nd edn (London: Macmillan, 1946), 109.
2. Hans J. Morgenthau, Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, 5th rev. edn (New York: Knopf, 1978), 154.
3. Hedley Bull, The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics (New York: Columbia University Press, 1977).
4. James N. Rosenau, Linkage Politics: Essays on Convergence of National and International Systems (New York: Free Press, 1969).
5. Richard W. Mansbach, Yale H. Ferguson, and Donald E. Lampert, The Web of World Politics: Nonstate Actors in the Global System (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1976).
6. Yale H. Ferguson and Richard W. Mansbach, Polities: Authority, Identities, and Change (Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press, 1996).
7. Yale H. Ferguson and Richard W. Mansbach, Remapping Global Politics: History's Revenge and Future Shock (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).
8. See his trilogy: Turbulence in World Politics: A Theory of Change and Continuity (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990);
9. Along the Domestic-Foreign Frontier: Exploring Governance in a Turbulent World (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997);
10. and Distant Proximities: Dynamics beyond Globalization (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2003).
11. Rosenau, Turbulence in World Politics, p.6.
12. See also Rosenau, Along the Domestic-Foreign Frontier, p. 38n;
13. and James N. Rosenau, 'Beyond Postinternationalism' in Pondering Postinternationalism, ed. Heidi H. Hobbs (Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 2000), 219-37.
14. Rosenau continues to stress fragmegrative processes in Distant Proximities, 11-16.
15. Ferguson and Mansbach, Polities, 51-7, 383.
16. See K. J. Holsti, 'The Problem of Change in International Relations Theory' in Political Space: Frontiers of Change and Governance in a Globalizing World, ed. Yale H. Ferguson and R. J. Barry Jones (Albany: State University of New York Press, 2002), 3-43.
17. James N. Rosenau, 'NGOs and Fragmented Authority in Globalizing Space' in Political Space, ed. Ferguson and Jones, 261-79.
18. Saskia Saseen, Territory, Authority, Rights: From Medieval to Global Assemblages (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006), 404.
19. Rosenau, Along the Domestic-Foreign Frontier, 22-3.
20. Ibid., 56-77.
21. Ibid., 4.
22. Ibid., 5.
23. For example, Robert Gilpin, War and Change in World Politics (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1981), 7.
24. James N. Rosenau, 'Multilateral Governance and the Nation-State System: A Post-Cold War Assessment'. Paper for the first meeting of a Study Group of the Inter-American Dialogue in Washington, DC, 1995,3.
25. Rosenau, Distant Proximities, 4.
26. Rosenau, Turbulence, 97-8.
27. See, for example, Robert O. Keohane and Joseph S. Nye, Power and Interdependence, 3rd edn (New York: Longman, 2001).
28. As Rosenau sees it, 'an SOA can be an issue regime, a professional society, an epistemic community, a neighborhood, a network of the like-minded, a truth commission, a corporation, business subscribers to codes of conduct..., a social movement, a local or provincial government, a diaspora, a regional association, a loose confederation of NGOs, a transnational advocacy group, a paramilitary force, a credit-rating agency, a strategic partnership, a transnational network, a terrorist organization, and so on across all the diverse collectivities that have become sources of decisional authority in the ever more complex multi-centric world', Distant Proximities, 295.
29. Ferguson and Mansbach, Polities, 48-9.
30. Stephen D. Krasner, Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999), 4.
31. See, for example, Hendrik Spruyt, The Sovereign State and Its Competitors (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994).
32. Niall Ferguson, 'Empires with Expiration Dates', Foreign Policy 156 (September/October 2006), 46.
33. See, for example, Susan J. Pharr and Robert D. Putnam (eds), Disaffected Democracies: What's Troubling the Trilateral Countries (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000).
34. Forbes .
35. See Sassen, Territory, Authority, Rights.
36. See Michael Slackman, 'And Now, Islamism Trumps Arabism,' New York Times (20August 2006), .
37. See also Stéphanie Giry, 'France and Its Muslims', Foreign Affairs 85, no. 5 (September/October 2006): 87-104.
38. See Christopher Caldwell, 'After Londonistan', New York Times Magazine (23 June 2006), 41-7, 62, 74.
39. Susan Strange, The Retreat of the State: The Diffusion of Power in the World Economy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), 198-9.
40. Albert O. Hirschman, The Passions and the Interests: Political Arguments for Capitalism before Its Triumph (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1977).
41. See A. Claire Cutler, Virginia Haufler, and Tony Porter (eds), Private Authority and International Affairs (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1999);
42. and Rodney Bruce Hall and Thomas J. Biersteker (eds), The Emergence of Private Authority in Global Governance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).
43. See the section on 'Realist Approaches' in Jennifer Sterling-Folker (ed.), Making Sense of International Relations Theory (Boulder: Lynne Rienner, 2005).
44. Krasner, Sovereignty.
45. It always was something of a myth, as Janice E. Thomson argues convincingly in Mercenaries, Pirates, and Sovereigns (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994).
46. See also Oded Lowenheim, Predators and Parasites: Persistent Agents of Transnational Harm and Great Power Authority (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2007).
47. See Hans J. Morgenthau, Scientific Man vs. Power Politics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1946), 175-91.
48. Barry Buzan, Richard Little, and Charles Jones. The Logic of Anarchy: Neorealism to Structural Realism (New York: Columbia University Press, 1993).
49. See also Robert A. Denemark, Jonathan Friedman, Barry K. Friedman, and George Modelski (eds), World System History: The Science of Long-Term Change (London: Routledge, 2000).
50. Barry Buzan and Richard Little, International Systems in World History: Remaking the Study of International Relations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000), 374.
51. Thomas L. Friedman, The World Is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2005).
52. Richard Florida, 'The World Is Spiky', Atlantic Monthly (October 2005): 48-51.
53. Saskia Sassen, The Global City, 2nd edn (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001).
54. Sassen, Territory, Authority, Rights, 54.
55. Robert O. Keohane, After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984).
56. Bull, The Anarchical Society.
57. Alexander Wendt, Social Theory of International Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).
58. Alexander Wendt, 'Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics,' International Organization 46, no. 2 (Spring, 1992): 391-425.
59. Robert O. Keohane, Power and Governance in a Partially Globalized World (London: Routledge, 2002).
60. Friedrich V. Kratochwil, Rules, Norms, and Decisions: On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1989).
61. Vendulka Kubálková, Nicholas Onuf, and Paul Kowert, International Relations in a Constructed World (Armonk, NY, M. E. Sharpe, 1998).
62. John Gerard Ruggie, Constructing the World Polity: Essays on International Institutionalization (London: Routledge, 1998).
63. Michael Barnett and Martha Finnemore, Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2004).
64. 'Preface,' in Kubálkova, Onuf, and Kowert, International Relations in a Constructed World, xi. This reference courtesy of an anonymous reviewer of this article.
65. Bull, The Anarchical Society, 264-76.
66. See, for example, Denemark et al. (eds), World System History.
67. Rosenau, Distant Proximities, ch. 19.
68. Yale H. Ferguson and Richard W. Mansbach, The Elusive Quest Continues: Theory and Global Politics (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 2003).
69. See also Yale H. Ferguson and Richard W. Mansbach, 'Remapping Political Space: Issue and Non-Issues in Analyzing Global Politics in the Twenty-First Century', in Political Space, ed. Ferguson and Jones, 87-111.