When /b/ill with /g/ill becomes /d/ill: Evidence for a lexical effect in audiovisual speech perception

European Journal of Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 1-11

  Barutchu, Ayla ^a   Crewther, Sheila G ^a   Kiely, Patricia ^a   Murphy, Melanie J ^a   Crewther, David P ^a,b  

^a LA TROBE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VISION; VISUAL ILLUSION; VISUAL INFORMATION; VISUAL STIMULATION; WORD RECOGNITION;

EID: 36249004960     PISSN: 09541446     EISSN: 14640635     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09541440601125623     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Binnie, C. A., Montgomery, A. A., & Jackson, P. L. (1974). Auditory and visual contributions to the perception of consonants. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 17, 619-630.
2. Brancazio, L. (2004). Lexical influences in audiovisual speech perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30(3), 445-463.
3. Calvert, G. A., Bullmore, E. T., Brammer, M. J., Campbell, R., Williams, S. C., McGuire, P. K., et al. (1997). Activation of auditory cortex during silent lipreading. Science, 276(5312), 593-596.
4. Calvert, G. A., Campbell, R., & Brammer, M. J. (2000). Evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging of crossmodal binding in the human heteromodal cortex. Current Biology, 10, 649-657.
5. Colin, C., Radeau, M., Deltenre, P., & Morais, J. (2001). Ruleas of intersensory integration in spatial scene analysis and speech reading. Psychologica Belgica, 41, 131-144.
6. Connine, C. M., & Clifton, C., Jr. (1987). Interactive use of lexical information in speech perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance", 13(2), 291-299.
7. Cutler, A., Mehler, J., Norris, D., & Segui, J. (1987). Phoneme identification and the lexicon. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 141-177.
8. Dekle, D. J., Fowler, C. A., & Funnell, M. G. (1992). Audiovisual integration in perception of real words. Perception and Psychophysics, 51(4), 355-362.
9. Easton, R. D., & Basala, M. (1982). Perceptual dominance during lipreading. Perception and Psychophysics, 32(6), 562-570.
10. Ganong, W. F., III. (1980). Phonetic categorization in auditory word perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 6(1), 110-125.
11. Green, K. P. (1998). The use of auditory and visual information during phonetic processing: Implications for theories of speech perception. In R. Campbell, B. Dodd, & D. Burnham (Eds.), Hearing by eye: II. Advances in the psychology of speech reading and auditory-visual speech (pp. 3-25). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
12. Heitanen, J. K., Manninen, P., Sams, M., & Surakka, V. (2001). Does audiovisual perception use information about facial configuration? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 13(3), 395-407.
13. Jones, J. A., & Callan, D. E. (2003). Brain activity during audiovisual speech perception: An fMRI study of the McGurk Effect. Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuropsychology, 14, 1129-1133.
14. MacDonald, J., Andersen, S., & Bachmann, T. (2000). Hearing by eye: How much spatial degradation can be tolerated? Perception, 29(10), 1155-1168.
15. MacDonald, J., & McGurk, H. (1978). Visual influences on speech perception processes. Perception and Psychophysics, 24(3), 253-257.
16. Massaro, D. W., & Cohen, M. M. (1993). Perceiving asynchronous bimodal speech in consonant-vowel and vowel syllables. Speech Communication, 13, 127-134 .
17. Massaro, D. W., Cohen, M. M., & Smeele, P. M. T. (1996). Perception of asynchronous and conflicting visual and auditory speech. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 100(3), 1777-1786.
18. McGurk, H., & MacDonald, J. (1976). Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature, 264(5588), 746-748.
19. Mottonen, R., Krause, C. M., Tiippana, K., & Sams, M. (2002). Processing of changes in visual speech in the human auditory cortex. Cognitive Brain Research, 13, 417-425.
20. Munhall, K. G., Gribble, P., Sacco, L., & Ward, M. (1996). Temporal constraints on the McGurk Effect. Perception and Psychophysics, 58(3), 351-362.
21. Ohde, R. N., & Sharf, D. J. (1977). Order effect of acoustic segments of vc and cv syllables on stop and vowel identification. Journal of Speech Hearing Research, 20(3), 543-554 .
22. Pitt, M. A. (1995). The locus of the lexical shift in phoneme identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory. and Cognition, 21(4), 1037-1052.
23. Sams, M., Aulanko, R., Hamalainen, M., Hari, R., Lounasmaa, O. V., Lu, S., & Simola, J. (1991). Seeing speech: Visual information from lip movements modifies activity in human auditory cortex. Neuroscience Letters, 127, 141-145.
24. Sams, M., Manninen, P., Surakka, V., Helin, P., & Katto, R. (1998). McGurk Effect in Finnish syllables, isolated words, and words in sentences: Effect of word meaning and sentence context. Speech Communication, 26, 75-87.
25. Sharf, D. J., & Beiter, R. C. (1974). Identification of consonants from formant transitions presented forward and backward. Language and Speech, 17(2), 110-118.
26. Sumby, W. H., & Pollack, I. (1954). Visual contributions to speech intelligibility in noise. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 26, 212-215.
27. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics (3rd ed.). New York: Harper Collins College Publishers.
28. Windmann, S. (2004). Effects of sentence context and expectation on the McGurk illusion. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 212-230.