Rapid adaptation to scaled changes of the mechanical environment

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 98, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 3072-3080

  Hinder, Mark R ^a,b   Milner, Theodore E ^a  

^a SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARM MOVEMENT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELASTICITY; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; ERROR; EVOLUTIONARY ADAPTATION; FEMALE; FORCE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEARNING; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZATION; STRENGTH; TASK PERFORMANCE; TRAINING;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BIOMECHANICS; ENVIRONMENT; FEMALE; HAND; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MOVEMENT; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; MUSCULOSKELETAL EQUILIBRIUM; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE;

EID: 36249002273     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: 15221598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00269.2007     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Conditt MA, Gandolfo F, Mussa-Ivaldi FA. The motor system does not learn the dynamics of the arm by rote memorization of past experience. J Neurophysiol 78: 554-560, 1997.
2. Davidson PR, Wolpert DM. Scaling down motor memories: de-adaptation after motor learning. Neurosci Lett 370: 102-107, 2004.
3. Franklin DW, Osu R, Burdet E, Kawato M, Milner TE. Adaptation to stable and unstable dynamics as achieved by combined impedance control and inverse dynamics model. J Neurophysiol 90: 3270-3282, 2003.
4. Gomi H, Kawato M. Equilibrium-point control hypothesis examined by measured arm stiffness during multijoint movement. Science 272: 117-120, 1996.
5. Gomi H, Kawato M. Human arm stiffness and equilibrium-point trajectory during multi-joint movement. Biol Cybern 76: 163-171, 1997.
6. Hinder MR, Milner TE. Novel strategies in feedforward adaptation to a position dependent perturbation. Exp Brain Res 165: 239-249, 2005.
7. Howell DC. Statistical Methods for Psychology (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Duxbury Press/Wadsworth Publishing, 1997.
8. Kawato M. Feedback-error-learning network for supervised motor learning. In: Advanced Neural Computers, edited by Eckmiller R. Amsterdam: North-Holland/Elsevier, 1990, p. 365-372.
9. Lai EJ, Hodgson AJ, Milner TE. Influence of interaction force levels on degree of motor adaptation in a stable dynamic force field. Exp Brain Res 153: 76-83, 2003.
10. Milner TE. Accuracy of internal dynamics models in limb movements depends on stability. Exp Brain Res 159: 172-184, 2004.
11. Milner TE, Franklin DW. Impedance control and internal model use during the initial stage of adaptation to novel dynamics. J Physiol 567: 651-664, 2005.
12. Milner TE, Hinder MR. Position information but not force information is used in adapting to changes in environmental dynamics. J Neurophysiol 96: 526-534, 2006.
13. Milner TE, Hinder MR, Franklin DW. How is somatosensory information used to adapt to changes in the mechanical environment? Prog Brain Res 164: 305-375, 2007.
14. Osu R, Burdet E, Franklin DW, Milner TE, Kawato M. Different mechanisms involved in adaptation to stable and unstable dynamics. J Neurophysiol 90: 3255-3269, 2003.
15. Scheidt RA, Dingwell JB, Mussa-Ivaldi FA. Learning to move amid uncertainty. J Neurophysiol 86: 971-985, 2001.
16. Shadmehr R, Mussa-Ivaldi FA. Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task. J Neurosci 14: 3208-3224, 1994.
17. Smith MA, Ghazizadeh A, Shadmehr R. Interacting adaptive processes with different timescales underlie short-term motor learning. PLoS Biol 4: e179, 2006.
18. Thoroughman KA, Shadmehr R. Electromyographic correlates of learning an internal model of reaching movements. J Neurosci 19: 8573-8588, 1999.