Computed quality assessment of MPEG4-compressed DICOM video data

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Volumn 116, Issue , 2005, Pages 447-452

  Frankewitsch, Thomas ^a   Söhnlein, Sven ^a   Müller, Marcel ^b   Prokosch, Hans Ulrich ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Computer Assisted image processing; Coronary angiography; Quality control; Telemedicine

Indexed keywords

ANGIOGRAPHY; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; DIGITAL DEVICES; DIGITAL STORAGE; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; IMAGE COMPRESSION; MEDICAL IMAGING; QUALITY CONTROL; TELEMEDICINE; ULTRASONIC IMAGING;

COMPRESSED VIDEO; COMPUTER-ASSISTED IMAGE PROCESSING; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; DIGITAL IMAGING AND COMMUNICATION IN MEDICINES; INTERNET CONNECTION; PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS; QUALITY ASSESSMENT; STANDARD-RESOLUTION VIDEO;

MOTION PICTURE EXPERTS GROUP STANDARDS;

ALGORITHM; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; INFORMATION PROCESSING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; TELEMEDICINE;

ALGORITHMS; DATA COMPRESSION; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; TELEMEDICINE;

EID: 36248989300     PISSN: 09269630     EISSN: 18798365     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Bidgood WD, Jr., Horii SC, Prior FW, Van Syckle DE. Understanding and using DICOM, the data interchange standard for biomedical imaging. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1997; 4(3): 199-212.
2. Balis UJ. Digital imaging standards and system interoperability. Clin Lab Med 1997; 17(2): 315-322.
3. Andriole KP. Anatomy of picture archiving and Communications systems: nuts and bolts- -image acquisition: getting digital images from imaging modalities. J Digit Imaging 1999; 12(2 Suppl 1): 216-217.
4. Setti E, Trecate G, Ferrari M, Mainardi L, Musumeci R. Breast magnetic resonance imaging: A computer-based analysis of enhancement curves. J Digit Imaging 2001; 14(2 Suppl 1): 226-228.
5. Burger R, Kunzel KH, Brenner E. DICOM - A new approach in medical under- And postgraduate education. Med Educ 2001; 35(11): 1076-1077.
6. Loane M, Wootton R. A review of guidelines and standards for telemedicine. J Telemed Telecare 2002; 8(2): 63-71.
7. Frommelt PC, Whitstone EN, Frommelt MA. Experience with a DICOM-compatible digital pediatric echocardiography laboratory. Pediatr Cardiol 2002; 23(1): 53-57.
8. Ernst RD, Baumgartner BR, Tamm EP, Torres WE. Development of a teaching file by using a DICOM database. Radiographics 2002; 22(1): 217-221.
9. Wu M, Zheng Y, North M, Pisano E. NLM tele-educational application for radiologists to interpret mammography. Proc AMIA Symp 2002; 909-913.
10. Eng J. Improving the interactivity and functionality of Web-based radiology teaching files with the Java programming language. Radiographics 1997; 17(6): 1567-1574.
11. (Muster-)Berufsordnung für die deutschen Ärztinnen und Ärzte - MBO-Ä 1997 - geändert durch die Beschlüsse des 103. Deutschen Ärztetages, Köln. 2000.
12. Röntgenverordnung. 2005. http://www.laekb.de/40/10aesqr/05Gesetz/ Roentgenverordnung.pdf.
13. Spencer K, Solomon L, Mor-Avi V, Dean K, Weinert L, Gulati M et al. Effects of MPEG compression on the quality and diagnostic accuracy of digital echocardiography studies. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2000; 13(1): 51-57.
14. Okura Y, Matsumura Y, Hidaka K, Yokoyama H, Inada H, Harauchi H et al. Evaluation of the effect of varying MPEG-2 compression ratios on digital coronary angiographic assessment of stenosis severity. J Digit Imaging 2002; 15(4): 210-215.
15. Baker WA, Hearne SE, Spero LA, Morris KG, Harrington RA, Sketch MH, Jr. et al. Lossy (15:1) JPEG compression of digital coronary angiograms does not limit detection of subtle morphological features. Circulation 1997; 96(4): 1157-1164.
16. Brennecke R, Burgel U, Rippin G, Post F, Rupprecht HJ, Meyer J. Comparison of image compression viability for lossy and lossless JPEG and Wavelet data reduction in coronary angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2001; 17(1): 1-12.
17. Iyriboz TA, Zukoski MJ, Hopper KD, Stagg PL. A comparison of wavelet and Joint Photographic Experts Group lossy compression methods applied to medical images. J Digit Imaging 1999; 12(2 Suppl 1): 14-17.
18. Kerensky RA, Cusma JT, Kubilis P, Simon R, Bashore TM, Hirshfeld JW, Jr. et al. American College of Cardiology/European Society of Cardiology International Study of Angiographic Data Compression Phase I: The effect of lossy data compression on recognition of diagnostic features in digital coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 35(5): 1370-1379.
19. Final Report from the Video Quality Experts Group on validation of objective models of video quality assessment. http://www.mihandbook.stanford. edu/handbook/home.htm.
20. Working Group on Multimedia Communications Coding and Performance: Objective Video Quality Measurement Using a Peak-Signal-to-Noise-Ratio (PSNR). Committee T1 - Telecommunications. T1A1.1/2001-026R7. 2001.
21. Watson A, Hu J, McGowan J. DVQ: A digital video Quality metric based on human vision. Journal of Electronic Imaging 2001; 10(1): 20-29.
22. Offis. www.offis.org, 2005.
23. DIVX Professional 5.2.1. www.divx.org, 2005.
24. Yamakawa T, Toyabe S, Cao P, Akazawa K. Web-based delivery of medical multimedia contents using an MPEG-4 system. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2004; 75(3): 259-264.
25. Barbier P, Alimento M, Berna G, Cavoretto D, Celeste F, Muratori M et al. Clinical validation of different echocardiographic motion pictures expert group-4 algorythms and compression levels for telemedicine. Medinfo 2004; 2004: 1339-1342.