Observer agreement using the ACR breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS)-ultrasound, first edition (2003)

Korean Journal of Radiology

Volumn 8, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 397-402

  Chang, Suk Park ^a   Jae, Hee Lee ^a,c   Hyeon, Woo Yim ^a   Bong, Joo Kang ^b   Hyeon, Sook Kim ^a   Jung, Im Jung ^c   Na, Young Jung ^a   Sung, Hun Kim ^a  

^a The Catholic University of Korea   (South Korea)

^b The Catholic University of Korea   (South Korea)

^c The Catholic University of Korea   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Breast neoplasms, US; Breast, abnormalities; Breast, US

Indexed keywords

ADENOCARCINOMA; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BIOPSY; BREAST TUMOR; CLASSIFICATION; COLLOID CARCINOMA; COLOR ULTRASOUND FLOWMETRY; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; EVALUATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MEDICAL SOCIETY; MIDDLE AGED; NOMENCLATURE; OBSERVER VARIATION; PAGET NIPPLE DISEASE; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; RADIOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICS;

ADENOCARCINOMA; ADENOCARCINOMA, MUCINOUS; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOPSY; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA, DUCTAL, BREAST; CARCINOMA, INTRADUCTAL, NONINFILTRATING; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RADIOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SOCIETIES, MEDICAL; TERMINOLOGY AS TOPIC; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, DOPPLER, COLOR; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY;

EID: 36248988080     PISSN: 12296929     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2007.8.5.397     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. American College of Radiology. Breast imaging reporting and data system, Breast imaging atlas, forth ed. Reston, VA, American College of Radiology 2003
2. Hong AS, Rosen EL, Soo MS, Baker JA. BI-RADS for sonography: positive and negative predictive values of sonographic features. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;184:1260-1265
3. Mendelson EB, Berg WA, Merritt CR. Toward a standardized breast ultrasound lexicon, BI-RADS: ultrasound. Semin Roentgenol 2001;36:217-225
4. Ciccone G, Vineis P, Frigerio A, Segnan N. Inter-observer and intra-observer variability of mammogram interpretation: a field study. Eur J Cancer 1992;28A:1054-1058
5. Elmore JG, Wells CK, Lee CH, Howard DH, Feinstein AR. Variability in radiologists' interpretation of mammograms. N Engl J Med 1994;331:1493-1499
6. Vineis P, Sinistrero G, Temporelli A, Azzoni L, Bigo A, Burke P, et al. Inter-observer variability in the interpretation of mammograms. Tumori 1988;74:275-279
7. Baker JA, Kornguth PJ, Floyd CE Jr. Breast imaging reporting and data system standardized mammography lexicon: observer variability in lesion description. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;166:773-778
8. Skaane P, Engedal K, Skjennald A. Interobserver variation in the interpretation of breast imaging. Acta Radiol 1997;38:497-502
9. Baker JA, Kornguth PJ, Soo MS, Walsh R, Mengoni P. Sonography of solid breast lesions: observer variability of lesion description and assessment. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999;172:1621-1625
10. Stavros AT, Thickman D, Rapp CL, Dennis MA, Parker SH, Sisney GA. Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology 1995;196:123-134
11. Stavros AT. Breast Ultrasound, 1st ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2004:455-527
12. Lazarus E, Mainiero MB, Schepps B, Koelliker SL, Livingston LS. BI-RADS lexicon for US and mammography: interobserver variability and positive predictive value. Radiology 2006;239:385-391
13. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159-174
14. Svanholm H, Starklint H, Gundersen HJ, Fabricius J, Barlebo H, Olsen S. Reproducibility of histomorphologic diagnoses with special reference to the kappa statistic. APMIS 1989;97:689-698