Digital imaging of wounds: Are measurements reproducible among observers?

International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 245-248

  Quan, Susan Y ^a   Lazarus, Gerald S ^a   Kohli, Angela R ^a   Kapoor, Roger ^b   Margolis, David J ^b  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS BAYVIEW MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Wound area; Wound healing; WoundMatrix

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CAREGIVER; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIGITAL IMAGING; HUMAN; IMAGING SYSTEM; MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION; OBSERVER VARIATION; PHOTOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; WOUND; WOUND ASSESSMENT; WOUND HEALING;

DOCUMENTATION; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; INTERNET; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; WOUND HEALING;

EID: 36248983787     PISSN: 15347346     EISSN: 15526941     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1534734607306880     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Kantor J., Margolis DJ A multicentre study of percentage change in venous leg ulcer area as a prognostic index of healing at 24 weeks. Br J Dermatol 2000 ; 142 (5). 960-4.
2. Kantor J., Margolis DJ Efficacy and prognostic value of simple wound measurements. Arch Dermatol 1998 ; 134 (12). 1571-4.
3. Shrout PE, Fleiss J. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979 ; 2: 420-8.
4. Landis JR, Koch GG The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977 ; 33: 159-74.
5. Margolis DJ, Allen-Taylor L., Hoffstad O., et al. The accuracy of venous leg ulcer prognostic models in a wound care system. Wound Repair Regen 2004 ; 12 (2). 163-8.