Multimode flutter of long-span cable-stayed bridge based on 18 experimental aeroelastic derivatives

Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics

Volumn 96, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 83-102

  Mishra, Shambhu Sharan ^a   Kumar, Krishen ^b   Krishna, Prem ^b  

^a NORTH EASTERN REGIONAL INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (India)

^b INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ROORKEE   (India)

Author keywords

Flutter derivatives; Long span cable stayed bridge; Multimode approach; Rational function approximation; Self excited forces; State space form

Indexed keywords

CABLE STAYED BRIDGES; EIGENVALUES AND EIGENFUNCTIONS; EQUATIONS OF MOTION; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; NUMERICAL ANALYSIS;

AEROELASTIC FORCE; RATIONAL FUNCTION APPROXIMATION; STATE SPACE FORM;

FLUTTER (AERODYNAMICS);

CABLE STAYED BRIDGES; EIGENVALUES AND EIGENFUNCTIONS; EQUATIONS OF MOTION; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; FLUTTER (AERODYNAMICS); NUMERICAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 36248983216     PISSN: 01676105     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2007.03.006     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Agar T.J.A. Aerodynamic flutter analysis of suspension bridge by a model technique. Eng. Struct. 11 (1989) 75-82
2. Arnoldi W.E. The principle of minimised iterations in the solutions of the matrix eigenvalue problem. Quart. Appl. Math. 9 (1951) 17-29
3. Boonyapinyo V., Miyata T., and Yamada H. Advanced aerodynamic analysis of suspension bridges by state-space approach. J. Struct. Eng. ASCE 125 12 (1999) 1357-1366
4. Chen X., and Kareem A. Aeroelastic analysis of bridges under multi correlated wind integrated state space approach. J. Eng. Mech. ASCE 127 11 (2001) 1124-1134
5. Chen X., and Kareem A. Advances in modeling of aerodynamic forces on bridge decks. J. Eng. Mech. ASCE 128 11 (2002) 1105-1193
6. Chen X., Matsumoto M., and Kareem A. Time domain flutter and buffeting response of bridges. J. Eng. Mech. ASCE 126 1 (2000) 7-16
7. Chen X., Matsumoto M., and Kareem A. Aerodynamic coupling effects on flutter and buffeting response of bridge. J. Eng. Mech. ASCE 126 1 (2000) 17-26
8. Craig Jr. R.R. Structural Dynamics (1981), Wiley, New York
9. Dung N.N., Miyata T., Yamada H., and Minh N.N. Flutter response in long span bridges with wind-induced displacement by mode tracing method. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodynamics 77&78 (1998) 367-379
10. Ge Y.J., and Tanaka H. Aerodynamic flutter analysis of cable-supported bridges by multi-mode and full-mode approaches. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodynamics 86 (2000) 123-153
11. Jain A., Jones N.P., and Scanlan R.H. Coupled aeroelastic and aerodynamic response analysis of long-span bridges. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodynamics 60 (1996) 69-80
12. Jones N.P., and Scanlan R.H. Theory and full bridge modeling of wind response of cable supported bridges. J. Bridge Eng. ASCE 6 6 (2001) 365-375
13. Katsuchi J., Jones N.P., and Scanlan R.H. Multimode coupled flutter and buffeting analysis of the Akashi-Kaikyo Bridge. J. Struct. Eng. ASCE 125 1 (1999) 60-70
14. Lin Y.K., and Yang J.N. Multimode bridge response to wind excitations. J. Eng. Mech. ASCE 109 2 (1983) 586-603
15. MATLAB, 1995. Using matlab version 5, The Mathworks, Natick, MA, USA, 〈http://www.mathworks.com〉.
16. Mishra, S.S., 2005. Effect of wind drag on flutter of long-span cable-stayed bridges. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee (India).
17. Mishra S.S., Kumar K., and Krishna P. Identification of 18 flutter derivatives by covariance driven stochastic subspace method. J. Wind Struct. 9 2 (2006) 159-178
18. Miyata T., and Yamada H. Coupled flutter estimate of suspension bridges. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodynamics 33 (1990) 341-348
19. Miyata, T., Yamada, H., Kazama, K., 1995a. On application of the direct FEM analysis for long span bridges. In: Proceedings of Ninth International Conference on Wind Engineering, New Delhi, India, pp. 1030-1041.
20. Miyata, T., Yamada, H., Boonyapinyo, V., Santos, J.C., 1995b. Analytical investigations on the response of a long suspension bridge under gusty wind. In: Proceedings of Ninth International Conference on Wind Engineering, New Delhi, India, pp. 1006-1017.
21. Namini A.H. Analytical modeling of flutter derivatives as finite elements. Comput. Struct. 41 5 (1991) 1055-1064
22. Namini A., Albrecht P., and Bosch H. Finite element based flutter analysis of cable-suspended bridges. J. Struct. Eng. ASCE 118 6 (1992) 1509-1526
23. Roger, K.L., 1977. Airplane math modeling methods for active control design. AGARD-CP-228.
24. Sarkar P.P., Jones N.P., and Scanlan R.H. Identification of aeroelastic parameters of flexible bridges. J. Eng. Mech. ASCE 120 8 (1994) 1718-1742
25. Scanlan R.H. The action of flexible bridge under wind I: flutter theory. J. Sound Vib. 60 2 (1978) 187-199
26. Simiu E., and Scanlan R.H. Wind Effects on Structures. third ed (1996), Wiley, New York
27. Tanaka H., Yamamura N., and Tatsumi M. Coupled mode flutter analysis using flutter derivatives. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodynamics 41-44 (1992) 1279-1290
28. Tiffany, S.H., Adams, W.M., 1988. Nonlinear programming extensions to rational function approximation methods for unsteady aerodynamic forces. NASA Technical Paper 27776. NASA, Washington DC.
29. Xie, J., Xiang, H., 1985. State space method for 3D flutter analysis of bridge structures. In: Proceedings of Asia Pacific Symposium on Wind Engineering, New Delhi, India, pp. 269-276.
30. Zhang X., Xiang H., and Sun B. Nonlinear aerostatic and aerodynamic analysis of long span suspension bridges considering wind structure interactions. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodynamics 90 (2002) 1065-1080