Science and democracy

Nature Nanotechnology

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 6-7

  Toumey, Chris ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONSUMER; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; ETHICS; NANOTECHNOLOGY; POLITICAL SYSTEM; PUBLIC OPINION; SCIENCE; UNITED STATES;

CONSUMER PARTICIPATION; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; DEMOCRACY; NANOTECHNOLOGY; PUBLIC OPINION; SCIENCE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 36248973360     PISSN: 17483387     EISSN: 17483395     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2006.71     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. The Public Understanding of Science (The Royal Society, London, 1985).
2. Wynne, B. Public Understanding of Science 1, 37–43 (1992).
3. Jones, R. The Nanotechnology Engagement Group, Policy Report 1 (Sheffield, Involve, 2006); www.involving.org/negreports.
4. Royal Society & Royal Academy of Engineering, Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies: Opportunities and Uncertainties (The Royal Society, London, 2004); www.nanotec.org.uk/finalReport.htm.
5. Rogers-Hayden, T. & Pidgeon, N. Nanotechnol. Law Bus. 3, 167–178 (2006).
6. Kearnes, M., Macnaghten, P. & Wilsdon, J. Governing at the Nanoscale (London, Demos, 2006).
7. Miller, J. Public Understanding of Science 13, 273–294 (2004).
8. Toumey, C. Conjuring Science 28–31 (Rutgers Univ. Press, New Brunswick, New Jersey, 1996).
9. Kleinman, D. in Science, Technology, and Democracy (ed. Kleinman, D.) 139–165 (SUNY, Albany, New York 2000).
10. Gaskell, G. et al. Science 310, 1908–09 (2005).
11. Lee, C., Scheufele, D. & Lewenstein, B. Science Commun. 27, 240–267 (2005)
12. Cobb, M. & Macoubrie, J. J. Nanoparticle Res. 6, 395–405 (2004).
13. Guston, D. & Sarewitz, D. Sci. Soc. 24, 93–109 (2002).