Bivariate uncertainty analysis for impact testing

Measurement Science and Technology

Volumn 18, Issue 11, 2007, Pages 3565-3571

  Kim, H S ^a   Schmitz, T L ^a  

^a University of Florida   (United States)

Author keywords

Bivariate; Cosine error; Ellipsoid; Frequency response function; Mass loading; Uncertainty

Indexed keywords

CALIBRATION; EIGENVALUES AND EIGENFUNCTIONS; FUNCTION EVALUATION; IMPACT TESTING;

BIVARIATE; COSINE ERROR; ELLIPSOID; FREQUENCY RESPONSE FUNCTION; MASS LOADING;

UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

CALIBRATION; EIGENVALUES AND EIGENFUNCTIONS; FUNCTION EVALUATION; IMPACT TESTING; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

EID: 36248951512     PISSN: 09570233     EISSN: 13616501     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0957-0233/18/11/041     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Smith S and Tlusty J 1991 An overview of modeling and simulation of the milling process ASME J. Eng. Ind. 113 169-75
2. Altintas Y and Weck M 2004 Chatter stability of metal cutting and grinding Ann. CIRP 53 619-42
3. Jobson J D 1992 Applied Multivariate Data Analysis (NJ: Springer)
4. Ridler N M and Salter M J 2002 An approach to the treatment of uncertainty in complex s-parameter measurements Metrologia 39 295-302
5. International Standards Organization (ISO) 1993 Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (corrected and reprinted 1995)
6. Taylor B N and Kuyatt C E 1994 Guidelines for evaluating and expressing the uncertainty of NIST measurement results NIST Technical Note 1297 1994 edition
7. Hall B D 2004 On the propagation of uncertainty in complex-valued quantities Metrologia 41 173-7
8. Ashory M 1999 High quality modal testing methods PhD Dissertation Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London