Modeling semantics in composite Web service requests by utility elicitation

Knowledge and Information Systems

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 367-394

  Liang, Qianhui Althea ^a   Chung, Jen Yao ^b   Miller, Steven ^a  

^a SINGAPORE MANAGEMENT UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

^b IBM T J WATSON RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Additive independence; Expected utility; Generalized additive independence; Iterative and incremental request elicitation; MAUT; Preference structure; Semantic service request; Web service composition

Indexed keywords

ADDITIVES; BIRDS; QUALITY OF SERVICE; SEMANTIC WEB; SEMANTICS; STRUCTURE (COMPOSITION); WEBSITES;

EXPECTED UTILITY; GENERALIZED ADDITIVES; ITERATIVE AND INCREMENTAL REQUEST ELICITATION; MAUT; PREFERENCE STRUCTURES; SEMANTIC SERVICE; WEB SERVICE COMPOSITION;

WEB SERVICES;

EID: 36248948052     PISSN: 02191377     EISSN: 02193116     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10115-006-0052-4     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Bacchus F, Grove A (1995) Graphical models for preference and utility. In: Proceedings of the UAI-95, Montreal, pp 3-10
2. Benatallah B, Dumas M, Sheng QZ (2005) Facilitating the rapid development and scalable orchestration of composite web services. Distrib Parallel Dat 17(1):5-37
3. Blythe J (2002) Visual exploration and incremental utility elicitation. In: Proceedings of the 18th national conference on artificial intelligence
4. Boutilier C, Bacchus F, Brafman RI (2001) UCP-networks: A directed graphical representation of conditional utilities. In: Proceedings of the 17th conference on uncertainty in artificial intelligence (UAI), University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
5. BPEL (2005) http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/library/ws-bpel/
6. Braziunas D, Boutilier C (2005) Local utility elicitation in GAI models. In: Proceedings of the IJCAI-05 multidisciplinary workshop on advances in preference handling, Edinburgh, Scotland
7. Cornelissen F, Jonker CM, Treur J (2003) Compositional verification of knowledge-based task models and problem-solving methods. Knowl Inf Syst J 5(3):337-367
8. DAML-S (2001) http://www.daml.org/services/daml-s/0.9/
9. Fakas G, Kakas AC, Schizas C (2004) Electronic roads: Intelligent navigation through multi-contextual information. Knowl Inf Syst J 6(1):103-124
10. Fishburn PC (1967) Interdependence and additivity in multivariate, unidimentional expected utility theory. Int Econ Rev 8:335-342
11. Gonzales C, Perny P (2004a) GAI networks for utility elicitation. In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference (KR2004) on principles of knowledge representation and reasoning, pp 224-234
12. Gonzales C, Perny P (2004b) Graphical models for utility elicitation. In: Proceedings of the DIMACS/LAMSADE workshop on computer science and decision theory, France
13. Ha V, Haddawy P (1997) Problem-focused incremental elicitation of multi-attribute utility models. In: Proceedings of the 13th conference on uncertainty in artificial intelligence, pp 215-222
14. Jurisica I, Mylopoulos J, Yu SKE (2004) Ontologies for knowledge management: An information systems perspective. Knowl Inf Syst J 6(4):380-401
15. Keeney RL, Raiffa H (1976) Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs. Wiley and Sons, New York
16. Kreps DM (1988) Notes on the theory of choice. Under-ground classics in economics. Westview Press, Boulder
17. Lazovik A, Aiello M, Papazoglou M (2003) Planning and monitoring the execution of web service requests. Technical report #DIT-03-049, University of Trento
18. Liang Q, Chakarapani LN, Su SYW, et al. (2004) A semi-automatic approach to composite web service discovery, description and invocation. Int J Web Serv Res 1(4):64-89
19. Liang Q, Chung J, Miller S (2005) Towards semantic service request of web service composition. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on e-business engineering (ICEBE 2005)
20. Linden G, Hanks S, Lesh N (1997) Interactive assessment of user preference models: The automated travel assistant. In: Proceedings of the user modeling '97
21. Long DE (1993) Model checking, abstraction and compositional verification. PhD thesis, Carnegie Mellon University
22. Martin D, Paolucci M, McIlraith S, et al. (2004) Bringing semantics to web services: The OWL-S Approach. In: Proceedings of the first international workshop on semantic web services and web process composition (SWSWPC 2004), San Diego
23. McIlraith S, Martin D (2003) Bringing semantics to web services. IEEE Intell Syst Arch 18(1):90-93
24. McIlraith S, Son TC (2002) Adapting golog for composition of semantic web services. In: Proceedings of 8th conference on knowledge representation and reasoning (KR2002)
25. McIlraith S, Son TC, Zeng H (2001) Semantic web services. IEEE Intell Syst, Spl Issue Semantic Web 16(2):46-53
26. Medjahed B, Bouguettaya A, Elmagarmid AK (2003) Composing web services on the semantic web. VLDB J 12(4):333-351
27. OWL-S: Semantic Markup for Web Services (2006) http://www.ai.sri.com/ daml/services/owl-s/1.2/
28. Papazoglou M, Aiello M, Pistore M, et al. (2002) Planning for requests against web services. IEEE Data Eng Bull 25(4):41-46
29. Pu P (2003) User-involved preference elicitation. In: Proceedings of the 18th international joint conference on artificial intelligence, Workshop on Configuration, Mexico
30. Pu P, Faltings B (2000) Enriching buyers' experiences: The smartclient approach. In: Proceedings of the ACM CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pp 289-296
31. Schafer R (2001) http://www.kbs.uni-hannover.de/~henze/ ABIS/_Workshop2001/final/Schaefer/_final. pdf
32. Strikeiron, http://www.strikeiron.com/StrikeIronServices.aspx
33. Su SYW, Liang Q, Chakarapani LN, et al. (2003) A web service composition framework: Discovery, description and invocation. In: Proceedings of the ICECR-6, Texas
34. SWSL (2005) http://www.daml.org/services/swsl/
35. UNSCSP, http://www.unspsc.org/
36. von Winterfeld D, Edwards W (1986) Decision analysis and behavioral research. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
37. Web Services Description Language (WSDL) 1.1, W3C Note 15 March 2001, http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl