CONSUMERS, ECONOMICS, AND ANTITRUST

Research in Law and Economics

Volumn 21, Issue , 2004, Pages 1-62

  Kirkwood, John B ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 36148992979     PISSN: 01935895     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/S0193-5895(04)21001-6     Document Type: Review

References (37)

1. Adelman, M. (1969). A&P: A study in price-cost behavior and public policy . Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
2. Antitrust Section, American Bar Association (1980, 1983). The Robinson-Patman act: Policy and law (Vols 1 & 2). Chicago: American Bar Association.
3. Areeda, P., Hovenkamp, H., & Solow, J. (1998). Antitrust law: An analysis of antitrust principles and their application (rev. ed., Vol. IV). New York: Aspen.
4. R. Bork Vertical integration and the Sherman act: The legal history of an economic misconception University of Chicago Law Review 22 1954 157 201
5. R. Bork Legislative intent and the policy of the Sherman act Journal of Law and Economics 9 1966 7 48
6. Bork, R. (1978). The antitrust paradox . New York: Basic Books.
7. Carlton, D., & Perloff, J. (2000). Modern industrial organization (3rd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
8. W. Comanor F. Scherer Rewriting history: The early Sherman act monopolization cases International Journal of the Economics of Business 2 1995 263 289
9. F. Easterbrook Workable antitrust policy Michigan Law Review 84 1986 1696 1713
10. D. Farber B. McDonnell Why (and how) fairness matters at the IP/antitrust interface Minnesota Law Review 87 2003 1817 1870
11. D. Gifford Foreword: Antitrust’s troubled relations with intellectual property Minnesota Law Review 87 2003 1695 1718
12. P. Hammer Questioning traditional antitrust presumptions: Price and non-price competition in hospital markets University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform 32 1999 727 783
13. Hovenkamp, H. (1999a). Antitrust law: An analysis of antitrust principles and their application (Vol. XIV). New York: Aspen Law and Business.
14. Hovenkamp, H. (1999b). Federal antitrust policy: The law of competition and its practice (2nd ed.). St. Paul: West Group.
15. King, J. (1999). Introduction: Hastings law journal 50th anniversary edition. Hastings Law Journal , 50 , no pagination.
16. Kirkwood, J., & Woods, K. S. (1995). Robinson-Patman enforcement at the FTC: Promoting a level playing field while protecting consumers. Trade Regulation Reporter (Commerce Clearing House) , 7 , par. 50, 151.
17. Kwoka, J., & White, L. (1989). The antitrust revolution . Glenview: Scott, Foresman & Company.
18. R. Lande Wealth transfers as the original and primary concern of antitrust: The efficiency interpretation challenged Hastings Law Journal 34 1982 65 151
19. R. Lande Proving the obvious: The antitrust laws were passed to protect consumers (not just to increase efficiency) Hastings Law Journal 50 1999 959 968
20. R. Lande Consumer choice as the ultimate goal of antitrust University of Pittsburgh Law Review 62 2001 503 525
21. Leffler, K., & Leffler, C. (2004). Patent litigation settlements: Payments by the patent holder are anticompetitive and should be per se illegal. Research in Law and Economics (this volume). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
22. J. Levinsohn R. Feenstra Identifying the competition Journal of International Economics 28 1990 199 215
23. McConnell, R., & Brue, S. (1999). Economics: principles, problems, and policies (14th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
24. A. Meese Economic theory, trader freedom, and consumer welfare: State oil co. v. Kahn and the continuing incoherence of antitrust doctrine Cornell Law Review 84 1999 763 797
25. Muris, T. (2001). Antitrust enforcement at the Federal Trade Commission: In a word – continuity. Remarks before the American Bar Association, antitrust section annual meeting (available at http://www.ftc.gov/speeches/muris/murisaba.htm ).
26. J. Peterman The Federal Trade Commission v. Brown Shoe Company Journal of Law and Economics 18 1975 361 419
27. J. Peterman The International salt case Journal of Law and Economics 22 1979 351 419
28. Peterman, J. (2004). The Morton and International salt cases: Discounts on sales of table salt. Research in Law and Economics (this volume). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
29. Porter, M. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors . New York: Basic Books.
30. Posner, R. (1976). Antitrust law: An economic perspective . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
31. R. Posner Legal reasoning from the top down and from the bottom up: The question of unenumerated constitutional rights University of Chicago Law Review 59 1992 433 450
32. Scherer, F. M., & Ross, D. (1990). Industrial market structure and economic performance (3rd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
33. Sullivan, L., & Grimes, W. (2000). The law of antitrust: An integrated handbook . St. Paul: West Group.
34. U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Trade Commission (1992, revised 1997). Horizontal Merger Guidelines .
35. Warren-Boulton, F. (2000). The case against an Agrarian Antitrust Policy. Agricultural Outlook Forum (available at http://www.usda.gov/oce/waob/oc2000/speeches/warren-boulton.txt ).
36. O. Williamson Economies as an antitrust defense: The welfare tradeoffs American Economic Review 58 1968 18 35
37. Zerbe, R., & Knott, S. (2004). An economic justification for a price standard in merger policy: The merger of superior propane and ICG propane. Research in Law and Economics (this volume). Amsterdam: Elsevier.