Breast lesions incidentally detected with CT: What the general radiologist needs to know

Radiographics

Volumn 27, Issue SPEC. ISS., 2007, Pages

  Harish, Monica G ^a   Konda, Sheela D ^a   MacMahon, Heber ^a   Newstead, Gillian M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BREAST DISEASE; BREAST TUMOR; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INCIDENTAL FINDING; RADIOGRAPHY; RADIOLOGY; REVIEW;

BREAST DISEASES; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INCIDENTAL FINDINGS; RADIOLOGY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 36148988102     PISSN: 02715333     EISSN: 15271323     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/rg.27si075510     Document Type: Review

References (17)

1. Chang CH, Sibala JL, Fritz SL, et al. Computed tomographic evaluation of the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1978;131:459-464.
2. Chang CH, Nesbit DE, Fisher DR, et al. Computed tomographic mammography using a conventional body scanner. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1982;138:553-558.
3. Goldberg PA, White CS, McAvoy MA, et al. CT appearance of the normal and abnormal breast with mammographic correlation. Clin Imaging 1994;18:262-272.
4. Kim SM, Park JM. Computed tomography of the breast: abnormal findings with mammographic and sonographic correlation. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2003;27:761-770.
5. Fujita T, Doihara H, Takabatake D, et al. Multidetector row computed tomography for diagnosing intraductal extension of breast carcinoma. J Surg Oncol 2005;91:10-16.
6. Inoue M, Sano R, Watal R, et al. Dynamic multidetector CT of breast tumors: diagnostic features and comparison with conventional techniques. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;181:679-686.
7. Uematsu T, Sano M, Homma K, et al. Comparison between high-resolution helical CT and pathology in breast examination. Acta Radiol 2002;43:385-390.
8. Sardanelli F, Calabrese M, Zandrino F, et al. Dynamic helical CT of breast tumors. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1998;22:398-407.
9. Miyake K, Hayakawa K, Nishino M, et al. Benign or malignant? Differentiating breast lesions with computed tomography attenuation values on dynamic computed tomography mammography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2005;29:772-779.
10. Nishino M, Hayakawa K, Yamamoto A, et al. Multiple enhancing lesions detected on dynamic helical computed tomography-mammography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2003;27(5):771-778.
11. Ikeda DM. Breast imaging: the requisites. Philadelphia, Pa: Elsevier Mosby, 2004.
12. Marsteller LP, Shaw de Paredes E. Well defined masses in the breast. RadioGraphics 1989;9(1):13-37.
13. Cardenosa G. Breast imaging companion. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2001.
14. Boone JM, Nelson TR, Lindfors KK, et al. Dedicated breast CT: radiation dose and image quality evaluation. Radiology 2001;221:657-667.
15. Brook OR, Guralnik L, Keidar Z, Gaitini DE, Engel A. Pitfalls of the lactating breast on computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2004;28(5):647-649.
16. Breast imaging reporting and data system: mammography. 4th ed. Reston, Va: American College of Radiology, 2003.
17. Breast imaging reporting and data system: MRI. 4th ed. Reston, Va: American College of Radiology, 2003.