The digital divide in america's public schools

Advances in Educational Administration

Volumn 6, Issue , 2003, Pages 145-164

  Daniel, Philip T K ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 36148982640     PISSN: 14793660     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Abbot v. Burke N. J. 1990
2. ACLU v. Reno E. D.Pa. 1996
3. Alexander J.C. The promise of a cultural sociology: Technological discourse and the sacred and profane information machine R. Munch N.J. Smelser Theory of Culture 1992 University of California Press City, State 293 323
4. Americans with Disabilities Act 2001
5. Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition 2002
6. Assistive Technology for Individuals with Disabilities Act 2001
7. on file with the author Banks J. A response to a Nation at Risk King County Library Service Association Meeting 1983 University of Washington Berkeley and Los Angeles
8. Becker H.J. How computers are used in the United States: Basic data from the 1989 I.E.A. Computers in Educational Survey Journal of Educational Computing Research 17 4 1991 385 406
9. Bok D. Looking into education's high-tech future Harvard Magazine 1985 29 38 May/June
10. Brennaman N. G8's dotforce initiative: Bridging the digital divide or widening it? Minnesota Journal of Global Trade 11 2002, Summer 311 336
11. Brockman J. Digerati: encounters with the cyberlite 1996 Hardwired
12. Brown v. Board of Education 1954
13. (visited June 27, 2002) Clinton W. Presidential State of the Union Address U.S. Capitol 1996, January 23
14. Clinton W. President Bill Clinton, Future of the Net. 〈http://www.cnet.com/Content/Features/Dlife/Future/Visionaries/Interviews/int.clinton.hml〉 as quoted in Gable, W. Internet Use Policies Required in School Districts That Allow Pupils On-line Access, McGeorge Law Review , (29), 573–582.
15. Colton Joint (Ca) Unified School. District Individuals with Disabilities Education Law Reporter 22 1995 895 901
16. To appear in Damarin S. The digital divide vs. digital differences: Principles for equitable use of technology in education Educational Technology 2000
17. Daniel P.T.K. Pauken P. The electronic media and school violence: Lessons learned and issues presented Education Law Reporter 164 2002 1 40
18. Daniel P.T.K. Pauken P. The impact of the electronic media on instructor productivity and institutional ownership within copyright law Education Law Reporter 132 1999 1 20
19. Daniel P.T.K. Copyright law, fair use, and the internet: Information for administrators and other educational officials Education Law Reporter 122 1998 899 911
20. Daniel P.T.K. The electronic media and student rights to the information highway Education Law Reporter 121 1997 1 42
21. Daniel P.T.K. Daniel V. A legal portrait of the artist and art educator in free expression and cyberspace Education Law Reporter 140 2000 431 459
22. Accepted for publication in the Daniel P.T.K. Nance J. The role of the administrator in instructional technology policy Brigham Young Journal of Education and Law 2002
23. Daniel P.T.K. A history of discrimination against students in Chicago secondary schools History of Education Quarterly 20 1980 147 162
24. DeRolph v. State of Ohio Ohio, 1997
25. Dispenza M. Overcoming a new digital divide: Technology accommodations and the undue hardship defense under the Americans with Disabilities Act Syracuse Law Review 52 2002 159 181
26. Doe v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company 7th Cir. 1999
27. Gore A. Communications: Networking the future We need a national “Superhighway” for computer information Washington Post July 15, 1990 B3
28. Green K.C. A technology agenda for the 1990s Change Green postulates that during the 1980s higher education institutions spent as much as $16 billions on computers 1991 Jan./Feb
29. Hammond A. The digital divide in the new millennium Cardozo Arts and Entertainment Law Journal 20 2002 135 156
30. Hampton v. Jefferson County Board of Education W. D.Ky. 2000
31. Hernandez G. Eddy K. Muchmore J. Insurance web lining and unfair discrimination in cyberspace Southern Methodist University Law Review 54 2001, Fall 1953 1972
32. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act 2000
33. Jin S. Abate R. Teachers and technology tools in the middle school Site 99: Society for information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference San Antonio, Texas ERIC: ED 432285 1999, February 28–March 4
34. Kennard W. Equality in the information age Federal Communications Law Journal 51 1999, May 553 556
35. Keyes v. School District D. Colo. 1987
36. Keyes v. School District 1973
37. Kirp D. Schools as sorters University of Pennsylvania Law Review 121 1973 705 751
38. Kling R. Computerization and social transformation Science, Technology, and Human Values 16 1991 342 367
39. Labaton S. New F. C. C. chief would curb agency reach N.Y. Times 2002, Feb. 7 C1
40. (visited, June 30, 2002) Mendels P. Offered old computers, some school officials decline New York Times 2000, March
41. Morell J.A. Fleischer M. The impact of computer systems: Revolution or incremental change J.A. Morell M. Fleischer Advances in the Implementation and Impact of Computer Systems Vol. 1 1991 JAI Press San Francisco xii xxiii
42. National Commission on Excellence in Education A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform 1983 Government Printing Office Greenwich, CT 1
43. Nunn J. McPherson S. Rust W. Preparing teachers for school-based technology leadership Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference Proceedings 1998, March
44. People Who Care v. Rockford Board of Education School District N. D.III. 1994
45. People Who Care v. Rockford Board of Education School District 1997 205, 111 F.3d 528
46. (2001), 2001 WL 312498 Powell M. Testimony on telecommunication and the internet Hearing Before House Energy and Commerce, 108th Cong. 54 2001
47. Roszak T. The cult of information: The folklore of computers and the true art of thinking 1986 Pantheon
48. San Francisco (CA) Unified Sch. District Individuals with Disabilities Education Law Reporter 29 1998 912 914
49. Sculley J. the relationship between business and higher education: A perspective on the 21st Century Communications of the ACM 32 1989, Sept 1056 1061
50. Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 2001
51. 2 New York
52. Spectar J. Bridging the global digital divide: Frameworks for access and the world wireless web North Carolina Journal of International Law and Commercial Regulation 26 Fall, 2000 57 103
53. Sperry D. Daniel P.T.K. Huefner D. Gee E.G. Education law and the public schools: A compendium 1998
54. Statement of Michael Powell, Chairman, FCC Testimony on Telecommunication and the Internet: Hearing Before House Energy and Commerce, 108th Cong. 54 2001
55. Stern C. New FCC chairman favors a non-activist approach Washington Post 2001, February 7 E1
56. The Telecommunications Act of 1996 2000
57. 4
58. internet access. (Visited June 27, 2002) United States Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology Internet access in U.S. public schools and classrooms: 1994–2000 2001
59. (visited June 27, 2002) United States Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology e-learning: Putting a world-class education at the fingertips of all children 1996
60. (visited, June 29, 2002) United States Department of Education, Office of Civil Rights Agreement to resolve OCR complaint between North Carolina State University and the U.S. Dept. of Education, Office of Civil Rights 2001
61. (visited, June 27, 2002) United States Department of Commerce Falling through the net: Toward digital inclusion 2000
62. Vaas, L.Web blind spots. eWeek, at http://www.eweek.com (visited June 24, 2002).
63. Willie C. On excellence and equity in higher education Paper on file with the author 1982