Into the past: Morphological change in the dying years of Dalmatian

Diachronica

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 85-111

  Maiden, Martin ^a  

^a TRINITY COLLEGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Analogy; Dalmatian language; Language death; Morphological change; Morphomic structure; Romance languages; Verbal paradigms

Indexed keywords

EID: 36148979360     PISSN: 01764225     EISSN: 15699714     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/dia.21.1.05mai     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Aronoff, Mark. 1994. Morphology by Itself. Cambridge: MIT Press.
2. Aronoff, Mark. 1999. “Le systeme malgre lui”. Fonologia e morfologia dell’italiano e dei dialetti d’Italia. Atti del XXXI Congresso ed. by Paola Beninca, Alberto Mioni & Laura Vanelli, 321-332. Rome: Bulzoni.
3. Bartoli, Matteo. 1906. Das Dalmatische (2 vols.). Vienna: Kaiserliche Akademie der Wissenschaften.
4. Booij, Geert. 1998. “Allomorphy and the Autonomy of Morphology”. Folia Linguistica 31.25-56.
5. Booij, Geert & Jaap van Marle, eds. 2001. Yearbook of Morphology 1999. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
6. Cameron-Faulkner, Thea & Andrew Carstairs-McCarthy. 2000. “Stem Alternants as Morphological Signata: Evidence from blur avoidance in Polish nouns”. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19.813-835.
7. Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew. 1994. “Inflection Classes, Gender, and the Principle of Contrast”. Language 70.737-788.
8. Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew. 2001. “Umlaut as Signans and Signatum”. In Booij & van Marle 2001, 1-23.
9. Coppieters, Rene. 1987. “Competence Difference between Native and Near-native Speakers”. Language 63.544-573.
10. Doria, Marco. 1989a. “Dalmatico. Storia linguistica interna”. Lexikon der romanistischen Linguistik, vol. 3 ed. by Günter Holtus, Michael Metzeltin & Christian Schmitt, 522-530. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
11. Doria, Marco. 1989b. “Dalmatico. Storia linguistica esterna”. Lexikon der romanistischen Linguistik, vol. 3 ed. by Günter Holtus, Michael Metzeltin & Christian Schmitt, 530-536. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
12. Hadlich, Roger. 1965. The Phonological History ofVegliote. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina.
13. Ive, Antonio. 1886. “L’antico dialetto di Veglia.” Archivio glottologico italiano 9.114-187.
14. Lepschy, Giulio. 2001. “Mother Tongues and Literary Languages.” The Modern Language Review 96.xxxiii-xiix.
15. Lindgren, Anna-Riitta. 1999. “Linguistic Variation in the Historical Sociology of Multilingualism in Kven Communities”. Language Change: Advances in historical sociolinguistics ed. by Ernst Häkon Jahr, 141-166. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
16. Magni, Elisabetta. 2001. “Paradigm Organization and Lexical Connections in the Development of the Italian passato remoto”. In Booij & van Marle 2001, 75-96.
17. Maiden, Martin. 1992. “Irregularity as a Determinant of Morphological Change”. Journal of Linguistics 28.285-312.
18. Maiden, Martin. 1999. “Romance Historical Morphology and Empty Affixes”. TheEmergence of the Modern Languages Sciences: Studies in the transition from historico-comparative to structural linguistics in honor ofE. F. Konrad Koerner ed. by Sheila Embleton, John E. Joseph & Hans-Josef Niederehe, 485-498. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
19. Maiden, Martin. 2000. “Di un cambiamento intramorfologico: Origini del tipo dissi dicesti ecc., nell’italoromanzo”. Archivio glottologico italiano 85.137-171.
20. Maiden, Martin. 2001a. “A Strange Affinity: Perfecto y tiempos afines”. Bulletin of Hispanic Studies 58.441-464.
21. Maiden, Martin. 2001b. “What Sort of Thing is a Derivational Affix? Diachronic evidence from Romanian and Spanish suffixes”. In Booij & van Marle 2001, 25-52.
22. Maiden, Martin. 2001c. “Di nuovo sulle alternanze velari nel verbo italiano e spagnolo”. Cuadernos defilologia italiana 8.39-61.
23. Maiden, Martin. Forthcoming. “La ridistribuzione paradigmatica degli “aumenti” verbali nelle lingue romanze”. Hommage a Jozsef Herman ed. by Sandor Kiss & Giampaolo Salvi.
24. Maiden, Martin. In preparation. “Morphophonological Innovation”. Cambridge History of the Romance Languages ed. by Martin Maiden, John Charles Smith & Nigel Vincent. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Malkiel, Yakov. 1971. “Derivational Transparency as an Occasional Co-determinant of Sound Change. A new causal ingredient in the distribution of f and z in ancient Hispano-Romance”. Romance Philology 25.1-52.
26. Meyer-Lübke, Wilhelm. 1895. Grammaire des langues romanes, vol. 2: Morphologie. Paris: Welter.
27. Muljacic, Zarko. 1971. “Dalmate”. Manuel pratique de philologie romane ed. by Pierre Bec, 393-416. Paris: Picard.
28. Muljacic, Zarko. 1976. “Über zwei krkrumänische Texte aus dem 18. Jahrhundert”. Zeitschrift für Balkanologie 12.51-55.
29. Muljacic, Zarko. 1995. “Il dalmatico”. Lexikon der romanistischen Linguistik 2.2 ed. by Günter Holtus, Michael Metzeltin & Christian Schmitt, 32-42. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
30. Penny, Ralph. 2000. Variation and Change in Spanish. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31. Pirrelli, Vito. 2000. Paradigmi in morfologia. Un approccio interdisciplinare alla flessione verbale dell’italiano. Pisa-Rome: Istituti editoriali e poligrafici internazionali.
32. Rosenkranz, B. 1955. “Die Gliederung des Dalmatischen”. Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie 71.269-279.
33. Stump, Gregory. 2001. Inflectional Morphology: A theory of paradigm structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34. Tagliavini, Carlo. 1978. Le lingue neolatine. Bologna: Patron.
35. Tekavcic, Pavao. 1976/1977. “Sulla forma verbale vegliota fero e sull’origine del futuro veglioto”. Incontri linguistici 3.71-89.
36. Thomason, Sarah. 2001. Language Contact: An introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
37. Väänänen, Veikko. 1967. Introduction au latin vulgaire. Paris: Klincksieck.
38. Zamboni, Alberto. 1980/1981. “Un problema di morfologia romanza, l’ampliamento verbale in -idio, -idzo”. Quadernipatavini di linguistica 2.171-188.
39. Zamboni, Alberto. 1982/83. “La morfologia verbale latina in -sc- e la sua evoluzione romanza: Appunti per una nuova via esplicativa”. Quaderni patavini di linguistica 3.87-138.