Controlled experimentation on adaptations of pair programming

Information Technology and Management

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 297-312

  Domino, Madeline Ann ^a   Collins, Rosann Webb ^b   Hevner, Alan R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Agile methods; Controlled experiments; Pair programming; Test Cases first

Indexed keywords

EID: 36148974397     PISSN: 1385951X     EISSN: 15737667     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10799-007-0016-8     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. J. Aiken, Technical and human perspectives on pair programming, ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 2003, pp. 244-254.
2. M. Aydin, F. Harmsen, K. van Slooten, R. Stegwee, On the adaptation of an agile information systems development method, Journal of Database Management 16(4) (2005) 24-40. October/December.
3. K. Beck, Extreme Programming Explained. (Addison-Wesley, Boston, 2000).
4. B. Boehm and R. Turner, Using risk to balance agile and plan-driven methods, IEEE Computer, June 2003, pp. 57-66.
5. B. Boehm, R. Turner, Balancing Agility and Discipline: A Guide for the Perplexed. (Addison-Wesley, Boston, 2004).
6. M. Biggs, Pair programming: Development times two, InfoWorld, Framingham, July 24, 2000.
7. F. Brooks, The Mythical Man-Month, 2nd Edition. (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1995).
8. M. Domino, R. Collins, A. Hevner and C. Cohen, Conflict in collaborative software development, in: Proceedings of the SIGCPR/SIGMIS 2003 Conference, Philadelphia, PA, April 2003.
9. J. Erickson, K. Lyytinen and K. Seng, Agile modeling, agile software development, and extreme programming: The state of research, Journal of Database Management, 16(4), October/December 2005, pp. 88-100.
10. B. Fitzgerald, N. Russo and T. O'Kane, An empirical study of system development method tailoring in practice, in: Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Information Systems, December 2000, pp. 187-194.
11. B. Fitzgerald, N. Russo and T. O'Kane, Software development tailoring at Motorola, Communications of the ACM 46(4) (2003) 65-70 April.
12. N. Flor and E. Hutchins, Analyzing distributed cognition in software teams: A case study of team programming during perfective software maintenance, in: Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Workshop on Empirical Studies of Programmers, J. Koenemann-Belleveau et al. (eds.) Ablex Publishing, Norwood, NJ, 1991, pp. 36-59.
13. A. Gopal, R. Bostrom and W. Chin, Applying adaptive structuration theory to investigate the process of group support systems use, Journal of Management Information Systems, 9(2), Winter 1992-1993, pp. 45-62.
14. G. Hedin, L. Bendix and B. Magnusson, Teaching extreme programming to large groups of students, Journal of Systems and Software 74 (2005) 133-146.
15. S. JEX, Organizational Psychology: A Scientist-Practitioner Approach. (John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, NJ, 2002) pp. 65-90.
16. L. Lindstrom and R. Jeffries, Extreme programming and agile software development methodologies, Information Systems Management 21 (2004) 41-52.
17. J. Manzo, The Odyssey and other code science success stories, CrossTalk-The Journal of Defense Software Engineering 15(10) (2002) 22-24 October.
18. P. McBreen, Questioning Extreme Programming. (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 2003).
19. J. McGrath, Groups: Interaction and Performance. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1984).
20. M. Muller and F. Padberg, On the economic valuation of XP Projects, in: Proceedings of the Ninth European Software Engineering Conference, September 2003, pp. 168-177.
21. J. Nawrocki and A. Wojciechowski, Experimental evaluation of pair programming, in: Proceedings of the 12th European Software Control and Metrics Conference, ESCOM 2001, London, April 2001.
22. J. Nosek, The case for collaborative programming, Communications of the ACM 41(3) (1998) 105-108 March.
23. A. Parrish, R. Smith, D. Hale and J. Hale, A field study of developer pairs: Productivity impacts and implications, IEEE Software, September/ October 2004, pp. 76-79.
24. M. Poole and G. DeSanctis, Use of group decision support systems as an appropriation process, in: Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, January 1989.
25. M. Poole and G. Desanctis, Understanding the use of group decision support systems: The theory of adaptive structuration. In: C. Steinfeld and J. Fulk (eds.) Organizations and Communication Technology, (Sage, Newbury Park, CA, 1990) pp. 173-193.
26. C. Rolland and N. Prakash, A proposal for context-specific method engineering. In: S. Brinkkemper, K. Lyytinen and R. Welke (eds.) Method Engineering: Principles of Method Construction and Tool Support, (Chapman and Hall, Atlanta, 1996).
27. K. Siau, Information modeling and method engineering: A psychological perspective, Journal of Database Management, 10(4) (1999) 44-50.
28. D.I.K. Sjøberg, J.E. Hannay, O. Hansen, V.B. Kampenes, A. Karahasanovic, N-K. Liborg and A.C. Rekdal, A survey of controlled experiments in software engineering, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 31(9) (2005) 733-753 September.
29. D. Turk, R. France and B. Rumpe, Limitations of agile software processes, in: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on eXtrememe Programming and Agile Processes in Software Engineering, Sardinia, Italy, 2002, pp. 43-46.
30. D. Turk, R. France and B. Rumpe, Assumptions underlying agile software-development processes, Journal of Database Management 16(4) (2005) 62-87 October/December.
31. A. Venkatesh and N. Vitalari, An emerging distributed work arrangement: an investigation of computer-based supplemental work at home, Management Science 38(12) (1992) 1687-1706 December.
32. L. Williams, R. Kessler, W. Cunningham and R. Jeffries, Strengthening the case for pair programming, IEEE Software, July/August 2000, pp. 19-25.