Repeating phrases across unrelated narratives: Evidence of text repetition effects

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 35, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 1588-1599

  Klin, Celia M ^a   Ralano, Angela S ^a   Weingartner, Kristin M ^b  

^a BINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b HOFSTRA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPREHENSION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LINGUISTICS; MALE; NARRATIVE; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTION; PROBABILITY; READING; TEXT REPETITION; TIME; UNITED STATES; VERBAL MEMORY;

EID: 36148973879     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03193493     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. BESSON, M., & KUTAS, M. (1993). The many facets of repetition: A cued-recall and event related potential analysis of repeating words in same versus different sentence contexts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory, & Cognition, 19, 1115-1133.
2. CARLSON, L., ALENJANO, A., & CARR, T. H. (1991). The level of focal attention hypothesis in oral reading: Influences of strategies on the context specificity of lexical repetition effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory, & Cognition, 17, 924-931.
3. CARR, T. H., & BROWN, J. S. (1990). Perceptual abstraction and interactivity in repeated oral reading: Where do things stand? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 16, 731-738.
4. CARR, T. H., BROWN, J. S., & CHARALAMBOUS, A. (1989). Repetition and reading: Perceptual encoding mechanisms are very abstract but not very interactive. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory, & Cognition, 15, 763-778.
5. GERRIG, R. J., & MCKOON, G. (1998). The readiness is all: The functionality of memory-based text processing. Discourse Processes, 26, 67-86.
6. GIBBS, R. W. (1990). Comprehending figurative referential descriptions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 16, 56-66.
7. GILLUND, G., & SHIFFRIN, R. M. (1984). A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. Psychological Review, 91, 1-67.
8. HAYMAN, C. A. G., & JACOBY, L. L. (1989). Specific word transfer as a measure of processing in the word-superiority paradigm. Memory & Cognition, 17, 125-133.
9. HINTZMAN, D. L. (1986). "Schema abstraction" in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review, 93, 411-428.
10. JACOBY, L. L. (1983). Remembering the data: Analyzing interactive processes in reading. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 22, 485-508.
11. JACOBY, L. L., BAKER, J. G., & BROOKS, L. (1989). Episodic effects on picture identification: Implications for theories of concept learning and theories of memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 15, 275-281.
12. LEVY, B. A., & BURNS, K. I. (1990). Reprocessing text: Contributions from conceptually driven processes. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 44, 465-482.
13. LEVY, B. A., CAMPSALL, J., BROWNE, J., COOPER, D., WATERHOUSE, C., & WILSON, C. (1995). Reading fluency: Episodic integration across texts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 1169-1185.
14. LEVY, B. A., & KIRSNER, K. (1989). Reprocessing text: Indirect measures of word and message level processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 15, 407-417.
15. MACLEOD, C. M. (1989). Word context during initial exposure influences degree of priming in word fragment completion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 15, 398-406.
16. MASSON, M. E. J., & FREEDMAN, L. (1990). Fluent identification of repeated words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory, & Cognition, 16, 355-373.
17. MCKOON, G., & RATCLIFF, R. (1995). The minimalist hypothesis: Directions for research. In C. A. Weaver, S. Mannes, & C. R. Fletcher (Eds.), Discourse comprehension: Essays in honor of Walter Kintsch (pp. 97-116). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. MORTON, J. (1969). Interaction of information in word recognition. Psychological Review, 76, 165-178.
19. MYERS, J. L., & O'BRIEN, E. J. (1998). Accessing the discourse representation during reading. Discourse Processes, 26, 131-157.
20. O'BRIEN, E. J., & ALBRECHT, J. E. (1992). Comprehension strategies in the development of a mental model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 18, 777-784.
21. OLIPHANT, G. W. (1983). Repetition and recency effects in word recognition. Australian Journal of Psychology, 35, 393-403.
22. ONISHI, K. H., & MURPHY, G. L. (1993). When metaphors are not understood as easily as literal expressions. Memory & Cognition, 21, 763-772.
23. RANEY, G. E. (2003). A context-dependent representation model for explaining text repetition effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 15-28.
24. RANEY, G. E., & RAYNER, K. (1995). Word frequency effects and eye movements during two readings of a text. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49, 151-172.
25. RANEY, G. E., THERRIAULT, D., & MINKOFF, S. (2000). Repetition effects from paraphrased text: Evidence for an integrated representation model of text representation. Discourse Processes, 29, 61-81.
26. RATCLIFF, R. (1978). A theory of memory retrieval. Psychological Review, 85, 59-108.
27. RIZZELLA, M. L., & O'BRIEN, E. J. (2002). Retrieval of concepts in script-based texts and narratives: The influence of general world knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 28, 780-790.
28. TENPENNY, P. L. (1995). Abstractionist versus episodic theories of repetition priming and word identification. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 339-363.
29. TUKEY, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
30. VAN DIJK, T. A., & KINTSCH, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.