False-positive prenatal diagnosis of trisomy 18 by interphase FISH: Hybridization of chromosome 18 alpha-satellite DNA probe (D18Z1) to the heterochromatic region of chromosome 9

Prenatal Diagnosis

Volumn 27, Issue 11, 2007, Pages 1064-1066

  Wei, Sainan ^a   Siu, Victoria Mok ^b   Decker, Amy ^a   Quigg, Mary Helen ^a   Roberson, Jacquelyn ^a   Xu, Jie ^b   Adeyinka, Adewale ^a  

^a HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Alpha satellite probes; Chromosome 18; Chromosome 9; D18Z1; FISH AneuVysion

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMNIOCENTESIS; AMNION CELL; AMNION FLUID ANALYSIS; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; CHROMOSOME 18; CHROMOSOME 9; CHROMOSOME ANALYSIS; DNA PROBE; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FETUS KARYOTYPING; FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMAN; HYDRAMNIOS; INTERPHASE; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; LYMPHOCYTE; MACROSOMIA; METAPHASE; NEUROBLASTOMA; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TRISOMY 18;

ADULT; CHROMOSOMES, HUMAN, PAIR 18; CHROMOSOMES, HUMAN, PAIR 9; DNA PROBES; DNA, SATELLITE; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; HETEROCHROMATIN; HUMANS; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION, FLUORESCENCE; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; TRANSLOCATION, GENETIC; TRISOMY;

EID: 36148962347     PISSN: 01973851     EISSN: 10970223     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pd.1819     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Brodeur GM. 2002. Clinical and biological aspects of neuroblastoma. In The Genetic Basis of Human Cancer, Vogelstein B, Kinzler KW (eds). McGraw-Hill: New York; 751-772.
2. Luquet I, Mugneret F, Athis PD, et al. 2002. French multi-centric study of 2000 amniotic fluid interphase FISH analyses from high-risk pregnancies and review of the literature. Ann Genet 45: 77-88.
3. Ozkinay F, Ercal D, Ozkinay C, Onay H, Bora E, Erler A. 2005. Two extra euchromatic bands in the qh region of chromosome 9. Genet Couns 16: 45-48.
4. Pergament E, Chen PX, Thangavelu M, Fiddler M. 2000. The clinical application of interphase FISH in prenatal diagnosis. Prenat Diagn 20: 215-220.
5. Samonte RV, Conte RA, Ramesh KH, Verma RS. 1996. Molecular cytogenetic characterization of breakpoints involving pericentric inversions of human chromosome 9. Hum Genet 98: 576-580.
6. Tepperberg J, Pettenati MJ, Rao NP, et al. 2001. Prenatal diagnosis using interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH): 2-year multi-center retrospective study and review of the literature. Prenat Diagn 21: 293-301.
7. Test and Technology Transfer Committee, American College of Medical Genetics. 2000. Technical and clinical assessment of fluorescence in situ hybridization: an ACMG/ASHG position statement. I. Technical considerations. Genet Med 2: 356-361.
8. Thangavelu M, Chen PX, Pergament E. 1998. Hybridization of chromosome 18 alpha-satellite DNA probe to chromosome 22. Prenat Diagn 18: 922-925.
9. Tsuchiya K, Schueler MG, Dev VG. 2001. Familial X centromere variant resulting in false-positive prenatal diagnosis of monosomy X by interphase FISH. Prenat Diagn 21: 851-855.
10. Weremowicz S, Sandstrom DJ, Morton CC, Niedzwiecki CA, Sandstrom MM, Bieber FR. 2001. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for rapid detection of aneuploidy: experience in 911 prenatal cases. Prenat Diagn 21: 262-269.
11. Winsor EJ, Silver MP, Theve R, Wright M, Ward BE. 1996. Maternal cell contamination in uncultured amniotic fluid. Prenat Diagn 16: 49-54.
12. Winsor EJT, Dyack S, Wood-Burgess EM, Ryan G. 1999. Risk of false-positive prenatal diagnosis using interphase FISH testing: hybridization of alpha-satellite X probe to chromosome 19. Prenat Diagn 19: 832-836.