Three-dimensional ultrasonography in the evaluation of the uterine cavity

Middle East Fertility Society Journal

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 41-46

  Momtaz, Mohamed M ^a,b   Ebrashy, Alaa N ^a   Marzouk, Ayman A ^a  

^a CAIRO UNIVERSITY   (Egypt)

^b NONE   (Egypt)

Author keywords

3D; Evaluation; Sonography; Three dimensional; Ultrasound; Uterine cavity; Uterus

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; ENDOMETRIUM POLYP; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYSTEROSALPINGOGRAPHY; HYSTEROSCOPY; LAPAROSCOPY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PREDICTION; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TRANSVAGINAL ECHOGRAPHY; UTERUS CAVITY; UTERUS MALFORMATION; UTERUS MYOMA; UTERUS SYNECHIA;

EID: 36148958964     PISSN: 11105690     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Merz E. Three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound in gynecological diagnosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999;4:81-86
2. Jurkovic D, Geipel A, Gruboek K, Jauniaux E, Natucci M, Campbell S. Three-dimensional ultrasound for assessment of uterine anatomy and detection of congenital anomalies: a comparison with hysterosalpingography and two-dimensional ultrasonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1995;5:233-237
3. Moeglin D, Benoit B, De Ziegler D. Advantages of studying the frontal plane of the uterine cavity in 3D ultrasound. Contracept Fertil Sex 1999;27:710-20
4. Ayoubi JM, Fanchin R, Ferretti G, Pons JC, Bricault I. Three-dimensional ultrasonographic reconstruction of the uterine cavity: toward virtual hysteroscopy? Eur Radiol 2002;12:2030-33
5. Kupesic S, Kurjak A, Skenderovic S, Bjelos D. Screening for uterine abnormalities by three-dimensional ultrasound improves perinatal outcome. Perinat Med 2002;30:9-17
6. Salim R, Woelfer B, Backos M, Regan L, Jurkovic D. Reproducibility of three-dimensional ultrasound diagnosis of congenital uterine anomalies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003;21:578-82.
7. La Torre R, De Felice C, De Angelis C, Coacci F, Mastrone M, Cosmi EV. Transvaginal sonographic evaluation of endometrial polyps: a comparison with two dimensional and three dimensional contrast sonography. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 1999;26:171-3.
8. Balen FG, Allen CM, Gardener JE, Siddle NC and Lees WR. Three-Dimensional reconstruction of ultrasound images of the uterine cavity. Br J Radiol 1993;66:588-91
9. Weitnraub Z, Maymon R, Shulman A, Bukovsky J, Kratochwil A, Lee A, Herman A. Three dimensional saline contrast hystersonography and surface rendering of uterine cavity pathology. Ultrasound Obstet gynecol 1996;8:277-282
10. Raga F, Bonilla-Musoles F, Blanes J, Osborne N. Congenital Mullerian Anomalies: Diagnostic accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasound. Fertile Steril 1996;65:523-528
11. Balen FG, Allen CM, Gardener JE, Siddle NC, Lees WR. Three-Dimensional reconstruction of ultrasound images of the uterine cavity. Br J Radiol 1993;66:588-91
12. Kiyokawa K, Masuda H, Fuyuki T, Koseki M, Uchida N and Fukuda T. Three dimensional hysterosalpingo-contrast-sonography "3D-Hycosy" as an outpatient procedure to assess infertile women: a pilot study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000;16:648-654
13. Kupesic. Clinical implications of sonographic detection of uterine anomalies for reproductive outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001;18(4):387-400
14. Wu MH, Hsu CC, Huang KE. Detection of congenital mullerian duct anomalies using three-dimensional ultrasound. J Clin Ultrasound 1997;25(9):487-92
15. Sylvestre C, Child TJ, Tulandi T, Tan SL. A prospective study to evaluate the efficacy of two- and three-dimensional sonohysterography in women with intrauterine lesions. Fertil Steril 2003;79(5):1222-5.
16. Woelfer B, Salim R, Benerjee S, Elson J, Regan L and Jurkovic D. Reproductive outcome in women with congenital uterine anomalies detected by three-dimensional ultrasound screening. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;96:1099-1103
17. Downey DB, Fenster A and Williams JC: Clinical utility of three dimensional U/S. Radiographics 2000;20:559-571
18. Ayida G, Kennedy S, Barlow D and Chamberlain P. Contrast sonography for uterine cavity assessment: a comparison of conventional two dimensional with three dimensional transvaginal ultrasound. Fertil Steril 1996;66:848-50
19. Ebrashy A, Momtaz M, Shawki O, Soliman E and Al Anany H. Comparative study between hystersonography, hysterography and hysteroscopy for evaluating the uterine cavity in recurrent aborters. Middle East Fertil Soc J 1998;3:62-65