What constitutes success in brownfield redevelopment? A review

WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment

Volumn 94, Issue , 2006, Pages 39-49

  Silverthorne, T ^a,b  

^a FOREST RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SURREY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Brownfield redevelopment; Evaluation; Green space creation; Success; Sustainable development; Urban greening

Indexed keywords

BROWNFIELD SITE; CONFERENCE PROCEEDING; GREENSPACE; MODELING; PERCEPTION; REDEVELOPMENT; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; URBAN DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 36148956545     PISSN: 17433541     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2495/BF060051     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Alker, S., Joy, V., Roberts, P. & Smith, N., The definition of brownfield, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 43(1), pp. 49-69, 2000.
2. EP [English Partnerships], Towards a national brownfield strategy, English Partnerships: London, 2003.
3. ODPM [Office of the Deputy Prime Minister], Landfill tax and the development of brownfield land, http://www.odpm.gov.uk/stellent /groups/odpm_urbanpolicy/documents/pdf/odpm_urbpol_pdf_608149.pdf
4. DETR [Department of the Environment, Transport & the Regions], Contaminated land: Implication of part IIA of the Environmental Protection Act 1990, HMSO: London, 2000.
5. ODPM [Office of the Deputy Prime Minister], Delivering growth in the Thames Gateway and the growth areas, www.odpm.gov.uk/stellent/groups/ odpm_communities/documents/page/odpm_comm_023301.hcsp
6. Carey, A., Briefing: Bringing brownfield sites back into use, Municipal Engineer, 157 (ME4), 231-237, 2004.
7. CPRE [Council for the Protection of Rural England], Housing supply. http://www.cpre.org.uk/campaigns/planning/housing-supply/index.htm
8. GP [Green Places], CPRE warns of loss of green belt, Green Places, 16(6), 2005.
9. Grimski, D. & Ferber, U., Urban brownfields in Europe, Land contamination and reclamation, 9(1), 143-148, 2001.
10. OECD [Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development], Urban brownfields, OECD: Paris, 2000.
11. Moore, N. M., From indigenous industry to foreign finance: The changing face of Dublin Docklands, Land Use Policy, 19, 325-331, 2002.
12. Gatrell, J. D. & Jenson, R. R., Growth through greening: Developing and assessing alternative economic development programmes, Applied geography, 22, 331-350, 2002.
13. Harrison, C. & Davis, G., Conserving biodiversity that matters: Practitioners perspectives on brownfield development and urban nature conservation in London, Journal of environmental management, 65, 95-108, 2002.
14. Nijkamp, P., Rodenburg, C. A. & Wagentonk, A. J., Success factors for sustainable urban brownfield development: A comparative approach to polluted sites, Ecological economics, 40, 235-252, 2002.
15. Layne, J., Marked for success The Winnipeg Core Area Initiative's approach to urban regeneration, Canadian Journal of Regional Science, Summer, 249-278, 2000.
16. DLEUC [Department of Land Economy in the University of Cambridge], Evaluation of the single regeneration budget challenge fund: An examination of baseline issues, A report for the DETR, DLE: Cambridge, 1999.
17. SGN [Smart Growth Newtork], Fairfield ecological park, Baltimore, Maryland, www.smartgrowtii.org/casestadies/ecoin_fairfield.html
18. Amekudzi, A. & Fomunung, I., Integrating brownfields redevelopment with transportation planning, Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 130(4), 204-212, 2004.
19. Burnham-Howard, C. E., Building on brownfields: Predicted effects of new liability protections for prospective purchasers and an exploration of other redevelopment incentives, Journal of Professional issues in engineering education and practice, 130(3), 212-225, 2004.
20. WHCEQ [White House Council on Environmental Quality], Over 1,000 to be trained for environmental jobs in brownfields communities nationwide, CEQ E-Notes, 2(13), 2004.
21. English, M., A guide for smart growth. Forum for applied research and public policy, 14(3), 35-39, 1999.
22. DETR [Department of the Environment, Transport & the Regions], Derelict land surveys in 1988 and 1993, HMSO: London, 1998.
23. De Sousa, C. A. Turning brownfields into green space in the city of Toronto, Landscape and urban planning, 62, 181-198, 2003.
24. Jensen, M. B., Persson, B., Guldager, S., Reeh, U. & Nilsson, K., Green structure and sustainability: Developing a tool for local planning. Landscape and urban planning, 52, 117-133, 2000.
25. Dunnett, N., Swanwich, C. & Woolley, H., Improving urban parks, play areas and green spaces, HMSO: London, 2002.
26. ODPM [Office of the Deputy Prime Minister], Creating sustainable communities: Greening the gateway, HMSO: London, 2004.
27. Brunsen, M. W. & Shelby, B., Assessing recreational and scenic quality. How does new forestry rate? Journal of Forestry, 90, 37-41, 1992.
28. Akbar, K. F., Hale, W. H. G. & Headley, A. D., Assessment of scenic beauty of the roadside vegetation in northern England, Landscape and Urban Planning, 63, 139-144, 2003.
29. Lang, D. A. & McNeil, S., Clean it up and will they come? Defining successful brownfield development, Journal of urban planning and development, 130(2), 101-108, 2004.
30. Anderson, L. & Cordell, H., Residential property values improving with trees. Scandinavian Journal of Applied Forestry, 9, 162-166, 1985.
31. Morancho, A. B., A hedonistic valuation of urban green areas, Landscape and urban planning, 66, 35-41, 2003.
32. Holden, R., Park and pride: Creating an urban park., The architects journal, July, 2001.
33. Tyrvainen, L. & Miettinen, A., Property pries and urban forest amenities, Journal of environmental economic and management, 39, 205-223, 2000.
34. Zetter, J., Frameworks for sound urban policy implementation, Town & Country Planning, 74 (2), 57-60, 2005.
35. Howland, M. What makes for a successful brownfield redevelopment? Three Baltimore case studies. www.smartgrowth.umd.edu/research/pdf/HowlandBrowns.
36. Lang, D. A. & McNeil, S., Brownfield development: Tools for stewardship, Journal of urban planning and development, 130(2), 109-116, 2004.
37. UTF [Urban Task Force], Towards an urban renaissance, E. & F. N. Spoon: London, 1999.
38. Andrew, A. S., Brownfield redevelopment: A State led reform of superfund liability. Natural Resources and Environment, 10(3), 27-31, 1996.
39. Strother, P. C., Brownfields of dreams in the old dominion: Redeveloping brownfields in Virginia, William and Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review, 23, 269-304, 2000.
40. EP [English Partnerships], Mixing places: A guide to good practice in undertaking mixed development schemes, Urban villages forum, English Partnerships: London, 1999.
41. CLARINET [Contaminated Land Rehabilitation Network for Environmental Technologies], The report of the CLARINET working group on brownfield redevelopment 1998 - 2001. www.clarinet.at
42. Alker, S. & McDonald, A., Incorporating sustainable development into redevelopment, Sustainable Development, 11, 171-182, 2003.
43. Buttel, F., Ecological modernisation as a social theory, Gerforum, 31, 57-65, 2000.
44. Wolman, H. L., Ford III, C. C. & Hill, E., Evaluating the success of urban success stories, Urban Studies, 31, 835-850, 1994.
45. Wernstedt, K., Heberle, L., Alberini, A. & Meyer, P., The brownfields phenomenon: Much ado about something or the taming of the shrewd? Discussion paper 04-46. www.rff.org
46. Stenner, R. D., Hull, R. N. & Willes, R. F. Involving stakeholders to achieve successful development of brownfield sites. Brownfield sites: Assessment, rehabilitation and development eds. C. A. Brebbia, D. Almorza, & H. Klapperich, WIT Press: Southampton, 2002.
47. Villavaso, S., Sinel, P. & Dauterive, L. The brownfields cookbook: A redevelopment guide. Brownfield sites: Assessment, rehabilitation and development eds. C. A. Brebbia, D. Almorza, & H. Klapperich, WIT Press: Southampton, 2002.
48. Agrawal, A., Common property institutions and sustainable governance of resources, World Development, 29(10), 1649-1672, 2001.
49. Pagdee, A., Kim, Y. & Daugherty, P. J., What makes community forest management successful: A meta-study from community forests throughout the world, Society and Natural Resources, 19(1), 33-52, 2006.