Erratum: Healthcare technology and technology assessment (European Spine Journal DOI: 10.1007/s00586-007-0369-z);Healthcare technology and technology assessment

European Spine Journal

Volumn 16, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 1293-1302

  Herndon, James H ^a   Hwang, Raymond ^a   Bozic, K H ^b  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Assessment; Clinical trials; Costs; Technology

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; CONSUMER; FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION; GOVERNMENT; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE INDUSTRY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH CENTER; HEALTH SURVEY; MARKETING; MEDICAL ERROR; MEDICATION ERROR; PHYSICIAN; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGISTER; REVIEW;

EID: 36148939471     PISSN: 09406719     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-007-0441-8     Document Type: Erratum

References (39)

1. Arbuckle, B (2006) Device maker pricing has big impact on America's healthcare bill. http://www.healthleadersmedia.com. 24 May
2. Bacin A, Stratton K, Burke SP (eds) (2006) Committee on the assessment of the U.S. drug safety system report: the future of drug safety: promoting and protecting the health of the public. National Academies, Washington http://www.IOM@edu/cms/3793/26341?37329.aspx. 5 October
3. Bal BS, Haltom D, Aleto E, Barrett M (2005) Early complications of primary total hip replacement performed with a two-incision minimally invasive technique. J Bone Jt Surg A 88A(Suppl):221-233
4. Bhattacharyya T, Yeon H, Harris MB (2005) The medical-legal aspects of informed consent in orthopaedic surgery. J Bone Jt Surg A 87A:2395-2400
5. Bhattacharyya T, Yeon H, Harris MB (2005) The medical-legal aspects of informed consent in orthopaedic surgery. J Bone Jt Surg A 87A:2399
6. Bozic KJ, Hansen E (2006) The impact of disruptive innovations in orthopaedic surgery. Orthop J Harvard Med School 8:37-39
7. Bozic KJ, Morshed S, Silverstein MD, Rubash HE, Kahn JG (2006) Use of cost-effectiveness analysis to evaluate new technologies in orthopaedics. The case of alternative bearing surfaces in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg A 88A:706-714
8. Bozic KJ, Pierce RG, Herndon JH (2004) Health care technology assessment. J Bone Jt Surg A 86A:1305-1314
9. Brennan TA, Leape LL, Laird NM, Nan M et al (1991) Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients: results of the Harvard medical practice study I. N Engl J Med 324:370-376
10. Callaghan JJ, Crowninshield RD, Greenwald AS, Lieberman JR, Rosenberg AL, Lewellan DG (2005) Introducing technology into orthopaedic practice. How should it be done? J Bone Jt Surg A 87A:1146-1158
11. Cherkin DC, Deyo RA, Loeser JD, Bush T, Waddell G (1994) An international comparison of back surgery rates. Spine 19:1201-1206
12. Christensen CM (2000) Will disruptive innovations cure healthcare? Harvard Bus Rev, September-October, pp 102-111
13. Deyo R (1991) Fads in the treatment of low back pain. N Engl J Med 325:1039-1045
14. Eisenberg JM, Zarin D (2002) Health technology assessment in the United States. Past, present, and future. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 18(2):192-198
15. Feeny D (1989) Technology assessment and the cost of healthcare. J Tech Assess Health Care 5:559-575
16. Frankle M, Levy JC, Pupello D, Siegal S, Saleem A, Mighell M, Vasey M (2005) The reverse shoulder prosthesis for glenohumeral arthritis associated with severe rotator cuff deficiency. A minimum two-year follow-up study of sixty patients. J Bone Jt Surg A 87A:1697-1705
17. Garber AM (2006) The price of growth in the medical-device industry. N Engl J Med 355:337-339
18. Gewande AA, Thomas EJ, Zinner MJ, Brennan TA (1999) The incidence and nature of surgical adverse events in Colorado and Utah in 1992. Surgery 126:66-75
19. Gillespie WJ, Pekarsky B, O'Connell DL (1995) Evaluation of new technologies for total hip replacement. Economic modeling and clinical trials. J Bone Jt Surg B 77B:528-533
20. Herzlinger, RE (2006) Why innovation in healthcare is so hard. Harvard Bus Rev, May, pp 58-66
21. Institute of Medicine (2006) http://www.iom@nas.edu
22. Lewellan DG (2005) Why new technologies should be submitted to the scientific review process before general implementation. In the American Orthopaedic Association symposium: introducing new technology into orthopaedic practice. How should it be done? J Bone Jt Surg A 87A:1157
23. Malchau H (2000) Introducing new technology: a stepwise algorithm. Spine 25:285
24. Maloney WJ (2001) National joint replacement registries: has the truth come? J Bone Jt Surg A 83A:1582-1585
25. Maynard A (1991) The relevance of health economics to health promotion. WHO Reg Publ Eur Ser 37:29-54
26. Millenson ML (1999) Demanding medical excellence: doctors and accountability in the information age. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
27. National Information Center on Health Services Research and Health Care Technology HTA 101: selected issues in HTA. National Institutes of Health. Available at http://www.nlm,gov/nichsr/hta101/ta101012.html. Accessed, 26 November 2006
28. Newmann PJ, Rosen AB, Weinstein MC (2006) Medicare and cost-effectivenss analysis. N Engl J Med 353:1516-1522
29. Roder C, El-Kerdi A, Eggli S, Aebi M (2004) A centralized total joint registry using web-based technologies. J Bone Jt Surg A 86A:2077-2080
30. Royal HD (1994) Technology assessment: scientific challenges. Am J Roentgenol 163(3):503-507
31. Tang N, Eisenberg JM, Meyer GS (2004) The roles of government in improving health care quality and safety. Jt Comm J Qual Saf 30(1):47-55
32. United States Government Accountability Office (GAO) Report (2006) Drug safety. Improvement needed in FDA's postmarket decision-making and oversight process. GAO-06-402 March, pp 1-38
33. Weinstein JN (2003) Emerging technology in the spine. Should we rethink the past or move forward in spite of the past? Spine 28:51
34. Weinstein JN (2006) An altruistic approach to clinical trials. The National Clinical Trials Consortium (NCTC). Spine 31:1-3
35. Weinstein JN (2006) An altruistic approach to clinical trials. The National Clinical Trials Consortium (NCTC). Spine 31:1
36. Weinstein JN (2006) An altruistic approach to clinical trials. The National Clinical Trials Consortium (NCTC). Spine 31:2
37. Weinstein JN (2006) An altruistic approach to clinical trials. The National Clinical Trials Consortium (NCTC). J Bone Jt Surg A 88A:1396
38. Wilson RM, Harrison BT, Gibberd RW, Hamilton JD (1999) An analysis of the causes of adverse events from the quality in Australian health care study. Med J Aust 170:411-415
39. Wong DA (2006) AAOS member patient safety survey: a first look. Bull Am Acad Orthop Surg 54:19-20