EFFECTIVE CONTENT-AREA INSTRUCTION FOR ALL STUDENTS

Advances in Learning and Behavioral Disabilities

Volumn 17, Issue , 2004, Pages 147-174

  Bulgren, Janis ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 36148937888     PISSN: 0735004X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/S0735-004X(04)17006-7     Document Type: Review

References (42)

1. Ausubel, D. P. (1963). The psychology of meaningful verbal learning . New York: Grune & Stratton.
2. Ausubel, D. P., Novak, J. D., & Hanesian, H. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
3. M. Bay J. Staver T. Bryan J.B. Hale Science instruction for the mildly handicapped: Direct instruction vs. discovery teaching Journal of Research in Science Teaching 29 6 1992 555 570
4. Borko, H., & Niles, J. A. (1987). Description of teacher planning: Ideas for teachers and researchers. In: V. Richardson-Koehler (Ed.), Educators Handbook: A Research Perspective (pp.167–187). New York, NY: Longman.
5. Borkowski, J. G., & Muthukrishna, N. (1992). Moving metacognition into the classroom: “Working models” and effective strategy teaching. In: M. Pressley, K. R. Harris & J. T. Gutherie (Eds), Promoting Academic Competence and Literacy in School (pp. 477–501). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
6. C.S. Bos P.L. Anders D. Filip L.E. Jaffe The effects of an interactive instructional strategy for enhancing learning disabled students’ reading comprehension and content area learning Journal of Learning Disabilities 22 6 1989 384 390
7. Bruner, J. S., Goodnow, J. J., & Austin, G. A. (1956). The study of thinking . New York: Wiley.
8. Bulgren, J. A., Deshler, D. D., & Schumaker, J. B. (1995). The content enhancement series: The concept mastery routine . Lawrence, KS: Edge Enterprises.
9. Bulgren, J. A., Lenz, B. K., Deshler, D. D., & Schumaker, J. B. (1995). The concept comparison Routine . Lawrence, KS: Edge Enterprises.
10. Bulgren, J. A., & Lenz, B. K. (1996). Strategic instruction in the content areas. In: D. D. Deshler, E. S. Ellis & B. K. Lenz (Eds), Teaching Adolescents with Learning Disabilities: Strategies and Methods (2nd ed., pp. 409–473). Denver, CO: Love Publishing.
11. J.A. Bulgren J.B. Schumaker D.D. Deshler Effectiveness of a concept teaching routine in enhancing the performance of LD students in secondary-level mainstream classes Learning Disability Quarterly 11 1988 3 17
12. Bulgren, J. A., Schumaker, J. B., & Deshler, D. D. (1994a). The content enhancement series: The concept anchoring routine . Lawrence, KS: Edge Enterprises.
13. J.A. Bulgren J.B. Schumaker D.D. Deshler The effects of a recall enhancement routine on the test performance of secondary students with and without learning disabilities Learning Disabilities Research and Practice 9 1 1994 2 11
14. Carver, S. M. (2001). Cognition and instruction: Enriching the laboratory school experience of children, teachers, parents, and undergraduates. In: S. M. Carver & D. Klahr (Eds), Cognition and Instruction: Twenty-Five Years of Progress . New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15. R. Driver P. Newton D. Osborne Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms Science Education 84 3 2000 583 590
16. Elmore, R. F. (1996, Spring). Getting to scale with good educational practice. Harvard Educational Review , 66 (1).
17. Erickson, L. (1998). Concept-based curriculum and instruction: Teaching beyond the facts . Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
18. Fensham, P., Gunstone, R. F., & White, R. T. (1994). Content of science: A constructivist approach to its teaching and learning . London: Falmer Press.
19. Gagné, R. M. (1965). The conditions of learning . New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
20. Gordon, S. E. (1996). Elicting and representing biology knowledge with conceptual graph structures. In: K. M. Fisher & M. R. Kibby (Eds), Knowledge Acquisition, Organization, and Use in Biology . Springer-Verlag.
21. K.R. Harris S. Graham Constructivism and students with special needs: Issues in the classroom Learning Disabilities Research & Practice 11 1996 134 137
22. H. Hodgkinson Reform vs. Reality Phi Delta Kappan 73 1 1991 8 16
23. S.V. Horton T.C. Lovitt D. Bergerud The effectiveness of graphic organizers for three classifications of secondary students in content area classes Journal of Learning Disabilities 23 1 1990 12 22
24. Jones, B. F., Palinscar, A. S., Ogle, D. S., & Carr, E. G. (1987). Strategic teaching and learning: Cognitive instruction in the content areas . Alexandria, VA: ASCD in cooperation with North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.
25. Klausmeir, H. J., & Associates (1979). Cognitive learning and development: Information-processing and Piagetian perspectives . Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing.
26. Klausmeir, H. J., & Ripple (1971). Learning and human abilities: Educational psychology . New York: Harper & Row.
27. B.K. Lenz G.R. Alley J.B. Schumaker Activating the inactive learner: Advance organizers in the secondary content classroom Learning Disability Quarterly 10 1 1987 53 67
28. Lenz, B. K., Bulgren, J. A., Kissam, B. K., & Taymans, J. (2003). Chapter 3: Smarter planning for academic diversity. In: B. K. Lenz & D. D. Deshler, with B. K. Kissam (Eds), Teaching Content to All: A Guide to Inclusive Practice . Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
29. Matthews, M. (2000). Appraising constructivism in science & mathematics education. In: D. C. Phillips (Ed.), Constructivism in Education . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30. Mayer, R. E. (1987). Educational psychology: A cognitive approach . Boston, MA: Little, Brown & Company.
31. C.D. Mercer L. Jordan S.P. Miller Constructivistic math instruction for diverse learners Learning Disabilities Research and Practice 11 1996 147 156
32. Merrill, M. D., & Tennyson, R. D. (1977). Teaching concepts: An instructional design guide . Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology.
33. National Center for Education Statistics (1999). Third international mathematics and science study (TIMSS) . Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research & Improvement.
34. National Research Council (NRC) (1996). National science education standards . Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
35. National Research Council (NRC) (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards . Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
36. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB) (2002). http://www.ed.gov/legislation/ESEA02/beginning.html.
37. Novak, J. (1998). Learning, creating, & using knowledge . New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
38. D.G. Olsen Constructivist principles of learning and teaching methods Education 120 2 1999, Winter 347
39. Swanson, H. L., & Ransby, M. (1994). The study of cognitive processes in learning disabled students. In: S. Vaughn & C. Bos (Eds), Research Issues in Learning Disabilities: Theory, Methodology, Assessment, and Ethics (pp. 246–275). New York: Springer-Verlag.
40. Thornton, S. J. (1991). Teacher as curricular-instructional gatekeeper in social studies. In: J. P. Shaver (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Social Studies Teaching and Learning . New York, NY: MacMillan.
41. Vaughn, S., Schumm, J. S., & McIntosh, R. (1991, April). Teacher adaptation: What students think. Paper presented at Meeting of American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
42. Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (1998). Understanding by design . Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.