MOTIVATING EMPLOYEE-OWNERS IN ESOP FIRMS: HUMAN RESOURCE POLICIES AND COMPANY PERFORMANCE

Advances in the Economic Analysis of Participatory and Labor-Managed Firms

Volumn 8, Issue , 2004, Pages 101-127

  Kruse, Douglas ^a   Freeman, Richard ^a   Blasi, Joseph ^a   Buchele, Robert ^a   Scharf, Adria ^a   Rodgers, Loren ^a   Mackin, Chris ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 36148932525     PISSN: 08853339     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/S0885-3339(04)08005-6     Document Type: Review

References (16)

1. Appelbaum, E., Bailey, T., Berg, P., & Kalleberg, A. (2000). Manufacturing advantage: Why high-performance work systems pay off . Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
2. Becker, B., Huselid, M., & Ulrich, D. (2001). The HR scorecard: Linking people, strategy, and performance . Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
3. A. Ben-Ner D.C. Jones Employee participation, ownership, and productivity: A theoretical framework Industrial Relations 34 4 1995 532 554
4. Blasi, J., Kruse, D., & Bernstein, A. (2003). In the company of owners . New York: Perseus Books.
5. Bullock, R. J., & Tubbs, M. E. (1990). A Case Meta-Analysis of Gainsharing Plans as Organization Development Interventions , 26 (3), 383–405.
6. Collins, D. (1998). Gainsharing and power: Lessons from six scanlon plans . Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, ILR Press.
7. Conyon, M. J., & Freeman, R. (2001). Shared modes of compensation and firm performance: U.K. evidence. Working Paper No. 8448, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
8. Freeman, R., & Dube, A. (2000). Shared compensation systems and decision making in the U.S. job market. Draft. Harvard University Department of Economics.
9. Ichniowski, C., Kochan, T. A., Levine, D., Olsen, C., & Strauss G. (1996). Industrial Relations , 25 (3), 299–334.
10. Kruse, D. (1993). Profit sharing: Does it make a difference? Kalamazoo, MI: W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
11. Kruse, D. (1999). Economic democracy or just another risk for workers? Reviewing the evidence on employee ownership and profit sharing. Paper delivered at Democracy, Participation, and Development conference, Columbia University, April. School of Management and Labor Relations, Rutgers University.
12. D. Kruse Research evidence on the prevalence and effects of employee ownership Journal of Employee Ownership Law and Finance 14 4, Fall 2002 65 90
13. Kruse, D., & Blasi, J. (1997). Employee ownership, employee attitudes, and firm performance: A review of the evidence. In: D. Lewin, D. J. B. Mitchell & M. A. Zaidi (Eds), The Human Resources Management Handbook, Part 1. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
14. Mackin, C. (2002). United it was not . Unpublished manuscript, Cambridge, MA, www.ownershipassociates.com .
15. J. Sesil M. Kroumova J. Blasi D. Kruse Broad-based employee stock options in high-technology firms: Company performance effects British Journal of Industrial Relations 40 2, June 2002 273 294
16. Weitzman, M., & Kruse, D. (1990). Profit Sharing and Productivity. In: A. S. Blinder (Ed.), Paying for Productivity: A Look at the Evidence (pp. 95–141). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.