메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 169-173

Smooth sailing for Australia's automatic forfeiture of foreign fishing vessels

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords


EID: 36049040898     PISSN: 0813300X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Editorial
Times cited : (5)

References (41)
  • 1
    • 84883627629 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • note
    • Olbers v Commonwealth (No 4) (2004) 136 FCR 67; 205 ALR 432 at 449; [2004] FCA 229.
    • (2004) , vol.4 , pp. 229
  • 2
    • 84883646189 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • note
    • R v Lijo [2004] WADC 29.
    • (2004) , pp. 29
  • 3
    • 84883609331 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • note
    • Lijo v the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions [2003] WASCA 4.
    • (2003) , pp. 4
  • 4
    • 84883615765 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • note
    • Olbers Co Ltd v Commonwealth (2004) 148 A Crim R 547; 212 ALR 325.
    • (2004) A Crim R , vol.148 , pp. 547
  • 5
    • 84883621442 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • note
    • [2004] FCAFC 262, Olbers v Commonwealth (No 4) (2004) 136 FCR 67; 205 ALR 432
    • (2004) , vol.4 , pp. 136
  • 6
    • 84883648260 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • note
    • [2004] FCA 229, Olbers v Commonwealth (No 3) [2003] FCA 651, Olbers Co Ltd v Commonwealth (No 2) [2003] FCA 177, Olbers Co Ltd v Commonwealth [2002] FCA 1269.
    • (2004) , vol.3 , pp. 1269
  • 7
    • 84883648053 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • note
    • Russian Federation v Australia) (Prompt Release) (Judgment) (2002) ITLOS Case No 11 (the Volga Case).
    • (2002)
  • 8
    • 36048997802 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Prompt Release Procedures and the Challenge for Fisheries Law Enforcement: The Judgment of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea in the Volga Case (Russian Federation v Australia)
    • note
    • See Gullett W, "Prompt Release Procedures and the Challenge for Fisheries Law Enforcement: The Judgment of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea in the Volga Case (Russian Federation v Australia)" (2003) 31 FL Rev 395.
    • (2003) FL Rev , vol.31 , pp. 395
    • Gullett, W.1
  • 9
    • 84883642379 scopus 로고
    • note
    • United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, opened for signature 10 December 1982, 1833 UNTS 3; ATS 1994 No 31; ILM 21 p 1261 (entered into force for Australia and generally 16 November 1994), Art 73.
    • (1994) United Nations Convention On the Law of the Sea , pp. 1261
  • 10
    • 84883615765 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • note
    • Olbers Co Ltd v Commonwealth (2004) 148 A Crim R 547; 212 ALR 325; [2004] FCAFC 262.
    • (2004) A Crim R , vol.148 , pp. 547
  • 11
    • 84883626892 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • note
    • Olbers v Commonwealth (No 4) (2004) 136 FCR 67; 205 ALR 432; [2004] FCA 229.
    • (2004) , vol.4 , pp. 229
  • 12
    • 84883636846 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • note
    • Olbers v Commonwealth [2005] HCA Trans 228 (per Hayne and Callinan JJ).
    • (2005) HCA Trans , pp. 228
  • 13
    • 34548679320 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Developments in Australian Fisheries Law: Setting the Law of the Sea Convention Adrift?
    • Gullett W, "Developments in Australian Fisheries Law: Setting the Law of the Sea Convention Adrift?" (2004) 21 EPLJ 169 at 173-176.
    • (2004) EPLJ , vol.21 , Issue.169 , pp. 173-176
    • Gullett, W.1
  • 15
    • 84883607841 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Testing the Waters: Fine Tuning the Provisions of the Fisheries Management Act 1991 (Cth) applicable to foreign fishing boats
    • Deakin LR 91 and Baird R, "Testing the Waters: Fine Tuning the Provisions of the Fisheries Management Act 1991 (Cth) applicable to foreign fishing boats" (2004) 32 UWALR 63.
    • (2004) UWALR , vol.32 , pp. 63
    • Deakin, L.R.1    Baird, R.2
  • 17
    • 84883615765 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • note
    • Olbers Co Ltd v Commonwealth (2004) 148 A Crim R 547; 212 ALR 325 at 331.
    • (2004) A Crim R , vol.148 , pp. 547
  • 18
    • 84883615765 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • note
    • Olbers Co Ltd v Commonwealth (2004) 148 A Crim R 547; 212 ALR 325 at 332.
    • (2004) A Crim R , vol.148 , pp. 547
  • 19
    • 84883644033 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • note
    • LOSC, Art 111(4).
    • , vol.4 , pp. 111
  • 20
    • 84883638287 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • note
    • Olbers Co Ltd v Commonwealth (2004) 148 A Crim R 547; 212 ALR 325 at 332.
    • (2004) A Crim R , vol.148 , pp. 332
  • 21
    • 84883627299 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • note
    • R v Lijo [2004] WADC 29.
    • (2004) , pp. 29
  • 22
    • 84883638287 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • note
    • Olbers Co Ltd v Commonwealth (2004) 148 A Crim R 547; 212 ALR 325 at 332.
    • (2004) A Crim R , vol.148 , pp. 332
  • 23
    • 84883613508 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • note
    • Olbers v Commonwealth (No 4) (2004) 136 FCR 67; 205 ALR 432 at 457.
    • (2004) FCR , vol.4 , pp. 457
  • 24
    • 84883649836 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • [2004] FCA 229.
    • (2004) FCA , pp. 229
  • 25
    • 84883614905 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • note
    • With respect to this last point, the declaration in s 87(2) and 87(3) that a pursuit is not taken to be terminated or substantially interrupted only because officers onboard the pursuit vessel have lost sight of the vessel they are pursuing, or have lost output from a radar or other sensing device, is a qualification not found in LOSC.
  • 26
    • 84878047995 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • note
    • Likewise, the statement in Art 111(4) of the LOSC that a pursuit can only commence "after a visual or auditory signal to stop has been given at a distance which enables it to be seen or heard" has not been included in the Fisheries Management Act 1991 (Cth).
    • Fisheries Management Act 1991
  • 27
    • 84883650564 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • note
    • LOSC, Art 62(4).
  • 28
    • 84883631417 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • note
    • Of note, coastal states may not provide penalties of imprisonment or corporal punishment for violations of fisheries laws by foreigners: LOSC, Art 73(3).
    • , vol.73 , Issue.3
  • 29
    • 84883620308 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • note
    • Commonwealth Constitution, s 51(xxxi).
  • 30
    • 84883638829 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • note
    • Olbers v Commonwealth (No 4) (2004) 136 FCR 67; 205 ALR 432 at 456.
    • (2004) , vol.4 , pp. 456
  • 31
    • 84883641801 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • [2004] FCA 229.
    • (2004) FCA , pp. 229
  • 32
    • 84883628190 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • note
    • Olbers Co Ltd v Commonwealth (2004) 148 A Crim R 547; 212 ALR 325 at 335.
    • (2004) A Crim R , vol.148 , pp. 335
  • 33
    • 84883644892 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • note
    • Olbers Co Ltd v Commonwealth (2004) 148 A Crim R 547; 212 ALR 325 at 334.
    • (2004) A Crim R , vol.148 , pp. 334
  • 34
    • 84883637594 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • note
    • Commonwealth Constitution, s 51(x).
    • , vol.10 , pp. 51
  • 35
    • 84883608220 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • note
    • Commonwealth Constitution, s 51(xxix).
    • , vol.19 , pp. 51
  • 36
    • 84883628489 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • note
    • Commonwealth Constitution, s 51(i).
  • 37
    • 84883628190 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • note
    • Olbers Co Ltd v Commonwealth (2004) 148 A Crim R 547; 212 ALR 325 at 335.
    • (2004) A Crim R , vol.148 , pp. 335
  • 38
    • 84883628190 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • note
    • Olbers Co Ltd v Commonwealth (2004) 148 A Crim R 547; 212 ALR 325 at 335.
    • (2004) A Crim R , vol.148 , pp. 335
  • 39
    • 84883644892 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • note
    • Olbers Co Ltd v Commonwealth (2004) 148 A Crim R 547; 212 ALR 325 at 334.
    • (2004) A Crim R , vol.148 , pp. 334
  • 40
    • 84883626491 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • note
    • Ian MacDonald (Minister for Fisheries), "New Chapter in Maritime Law: Attempt to Claim Back the Volga rejected" (Press release, 13 March 2004).
    • (2004)
  • 41
    • 84883613643 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • note
    • Note that s 87 limits the operation of s 84 seizure powers, including s 84(ga) automatic forfeiture seizures, for seizures outside the AFZ to where there has been a pursuit consistent with s 87. However, this would be of no avail to a dispossessed owner because at the time of the seizure they would not have been the owner of the vessel and therefore could not challenge the manner it which in was seized.


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.