Latent class modeling of phases in the development of transitive reasoning

Multivariate Behavioral Research

Volumn 42, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 457-480

  Bouwmeester, Samantha ^a   Sijtsma, Klaas ^b  

^a ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 36049031913     PISSN: 00273171     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00273170701384324     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Bouwmeester, S., & Aalbers, T. (2002). TRANRED. Tilburg: Tilburg University.
2. Bouwmeester, S., & Sijtsma, K. (2004). Measuring the ability of transitive reasoning, using product and strategy information. Psychometrika, 69, 123-146.
3. Bouwmeester, S., Sijtsma, K., & Vermunt, J. K. (2004). Latent class regression analysis to describe cognitive developmental phenomena: An application to transitive reasoning. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 1, 67-86.
4. Brainerd, C. J. (1978). The stage question in cognitive-developmental theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2, 173-213.
5. Brainerd, C. J. (1979). Markovian interpretations of conservation learning. Psychological Review, 86, 181-213.
6. Brainerd, C. J. (1993). Cognitive development is abrupt (but not stage-like). Monographs for the Society for Research in Child Development, 58, 170-190.
7. Brainerd, C. J., & Kingma, J. (1984). Do children have to remember to reason? A fuzzy-trace theory of transitivity development. Developmental Review, 4, 311-377.
8. Brainerd, C. J., & Kingma, J. (1985). On the independence of short-term memory and working memory in cognitive development. Cognitive Psychology, 17, 210-247.
9. Brainerd, C. J., & Reyna, V. F. (1990). Gist is the grist: Fuzzy-trace theory and the new intuitionism. Developmental Review, 10, 3-47.
10. Brainerd, C. J., & Reyna, V. F. (2001). Fuzzy-trace theory: Dual processes in memory, reasoning, and cognitive neuroscience. Advances in Child Development and Behaviour, 28, 41-99.
11. Brainerd, C. J., & Reyna, V. F. (2004). Perspectives in behavior and cognition. Developmental Review, 24, 396-439.
12. Bryant, P. E., & Trabasso, T. (1971). Transitive inferences and memory in young children. Nature, 232, 456-458.
13. Case, R. (1992). Neo-Piagetian theories of child development. In R. J. Sternberg & C. A. Berg (Eds.), Intellectual development (pp. 161-196). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
14. Chapman, M. (1988). Constructive evolution: Origins and development of Piaget's thought. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
15. Dayton, C. M. (1998). Latent class scaling analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16. De Koning, E., Sijtsma, K., & Hamers, J. H. M. (2002). Comparison of four IRT models when analyzing two tests for inductive reasoning. Applied Psychological Measurement, 26, 302-320.
17. Dolan, C. V., Jansen, B. R. J., & Van der Maas, H. L. J. (2004). Constrained and unconstrained multivariate normal finite mixture modeling of Piagetian data. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 69-98.
18. Flavell, J. H. (1963). The developmental psychology of Jean Piaget. New York: Litton Educational Publishing.
19. Flavell, J. H. (1970). Stage-related properties of cognitive development. Cognitive Psychology, 2, 421-453.
20. Flavell, J. H. (1985). Cognitive development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
21. Formann, A. K. (2001). Misspecifying latent class models by mixture binomials. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 54, 279-291.
22. Formann, A. K. (2003). Modeling data from water-level tasks: A test theoretical analysis. Perceptual Motor Skills, 96, 1153-1172.
23. Glas, C. A. W., & Ellis, J. L. (1994). Rasch scaling program. Groningen, The Netherlands: iecProGAMMA.
24. Glas, C. A. W., & Verhelst, N. D. (1995). Testing the Rasch model. In G. H. Fischer & I. W. Molenaar (Eds.), Rasch models. Foundations, recent developments, and applications (pp. 69-95). New York: Springer-Verlag.
25. Hagenaars, J. A., & McCutcheon, A. L. (2002). Applied latent class analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
26. Hosenfeld, B., Van der Maas, H. L. J., & Van den Boom, D. C. (1997). Detecting bimodality in the analogical reasoning performance of elementary school children. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 20, 529-547.
27. Jansen, B. R. J., & Van der Maas, H. L. J. (1997). Statistical test of the rule assessment methodology by latent class analysis. Developmental Review, 17, 321-357.
28. Jansen, B. R. J., & Van der Maas, H. L. J. (2001). Evidence for the phase transition from rule I to rule II on the balance scale task. Developmental Review, 21, 450-494.
29. Jansen, B. R. J., & Van der Maas, H. L. J. (2002). The development of children's rule use on the balance scale task. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 81, 383-416.
30. Lazarsfeld, P. F., & Henry, N. W. (1968). Latent structure analysis. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
31. Lohaus, A., & Kessler, T. (1996). Zwischen Lösungsverhaien und verbalisiertem Verständnis des Lösungsprinzips bei der Wasserspiegelaufgabe. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und pädagogische Psychologie, 28, 316-335.
32. Lohaus, A., Kessler, T., Thomas, H., & Gediga, G. (1994). Individuelle Unterschiede bei räumlichen Fähigkeiten im Kindesalter. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und pädagogische Psychologie, 26, 373-390.
33. McCutcheon, A. L. (1987). Latent class analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34. Piaget, J. (1947). La psychologie de l'intelligence. Paris: Collin.
35. Raijmakers, M. E. J., Jansen, B. R. J., & Van der Maas, H. L. J. (2004). Rules and development in triad classification task performance. Developmental Review, 24, 289-321.
36. Reyna, V. F. (1992). Reasoning, remembering, and their relationship: Social, cognitive, and developmental issues. In M. L. Howe, C. J. Brainerd, & V. F. Reyna (Eds.), Development of long-term retention (pp. 103-132). New York: Springer-Verlag.
37. Reyna, V. F., & Brainerd, C. J. (1990). Fuzzy processing in transitivity development. Annals of Operations Research, 23, 37-63.
38. Reyna, V. F., & Brainerd, C. J. (1995). Fuzzy-trace theory: An interim synthesis. Learning and Individual Differences, 7, 1-75.
39. Riley, C. A., & Trabasso, T. (1974). Comparatives, logical structures, and encoding in a transitive inference task. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 17, 187-203.
40. Rost, J., & Von Davier, M. (1995). Mixture distribution Rasch models. In G. H. Fischer & I. W. Molenaar (Eds.), Rasch models. Foundations, recent developments, and applications (pp. 257-268). New York: Springer-Verlag.
41. Siegler, R. S., & Chen, Z. (2002). Development of rules and strategies: Balancing the old and the new. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 81, 446-457.
42. Sijtsma, K., & Junker, B. W. (2006). Item response theory: Past performance, present developments, and future expectations. Behaviormetrika, 33, 75-102.
43. Sijtsma, K., & Meijer, R. R. (2007). Nonparametric item response theory and related topics. In C. R. Rao & S. Sinharay (Eds.), Handbook of statistics, vol. 26: Psychometrics (pp. 719-746). Amsterdam: Elsevier, North Holland.
44. Thom, R., & Fowler, D. H. (1975). Structural stability and morphogenesis. Reading, MA: Benjamin/-Cummings.
45. Thomas, H. (1989). A binomial mixture model for classification performance: A commentary on Waxman, Chambers, Yntema and Gelman. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48, 423-430.
46. Thomas, H. (1994). Mixture decomposition when the components are of unknown form. In A. Von Eye & C. C. Clogg (Eds.), Latent variable analysis (pp. 313-328). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
47. Thomas, H., & Hettmansperger, T. P. (2001). Modelling change in cognitive understanding with finite mixtures. Applied Statistics, 50, 435-448.
48. Thomas, H., & Lohaus, A. (1993). Modeling growth and individual differences in spatial tasks. Monographs for the Society for Research in Child Development, 58, (9, serial No. 237).
49. Thomas, H., Lohaus, A., & Kessler, T. (1999). Stability and change in longitudinal water-level task performance. Developmental Psychology, 35, 1024-1037.
50. Thomas, H., & Turner, G. F. W. (1991). Individual differences and development in water-level task performance. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 51, 171-194.
51. Trabasso, T., Riley, C. A., & Wilson, E. G. (1975). The representation of linear order and spatial strategies in reasoning: a developmental study. In R. J. Falmagne (Ed.), Reasoning: representation and process in children and adults (pp. 201-229). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
52. Van den Wollenberg, A. L. (1982). Two new test statistics for the Rasch model. Psychometrika, 47, 123-140.
53. Van der Maas, H. L. J. (1998). The dynamical and statistical properties of cognitive strategies: Relations between strategies, attractors, and latent classes. In K. M. Newell & P. C. M. Molenaar (Eds.), Applications of nonlinear dynamics to developmental process modeling (pp. 161-176). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
54. Van der Maas, H. L. J., & Molenaar, P. C. M. (1992). Stagewise cognitive development: An application of catastrophe theory. Psychological Review, 99, 395-417.
55. Van Geert, P. (1998). A dynamic systems model of basic developmental mechanisms: Piaget, Vygotski, and beyond. Psychological Review, 4, 634-677.
56. Van Maanen, L., Been, P. H., & Sijtsma, K. (1989). The lineair logistic test model and heterogeneity of cognitive strategies. In E. E. C. I. Roskam (Ed.), Mathematical psychology in progress (pp. 267-287). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
57. Vermunt, J. K., & Magidson, J. (2003). Latent Gold 3.0. Belmont, MA: Statistical Innovations Inc.
58. Verweij, A. C. (1994). Scaling transitive inference in 7-12 year old children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
59. Verweij, A. C., Sijtsma, K., & Koops, W. (1999). An ordinal scale for transitive reasoning by means of a deductive strategy. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 23, 241-264.
60. Wohlwill, J. F. (1973). The study of behavioral development. New York: Academic Press.