A noise resilient variable step-size LMS algorithm

Signal Processing

Volumn 88, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 733-748

  Costa, Márcio Holsbach ^a   Bermudez, José Carlos Moreira ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SANTA CATARINA   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Adaptive filter; LMS; Noise suppression.; Variable step size; VSS

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE FILTERS; ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; GAUSSIAN DISTRIBUTION; LEAST SQUARES APPROXIMATIONS; SIGNAL TO NOISE RATIO;

NOISE RESILIENT VARIABLE STEP SIZE; NOISE SUPPRESSION;

SIGNAL PROCESSING;

EID: 36049031842     PISSN: 01651684     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.sigpro.2007.09.015     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Haykin S. Adaptive Filter Theory. second ed. (1991), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
2. Breining C., et al. Acoustic echo control. An application of very-high-order adaptive filters. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 16 4 (July 1999) 42-69
3. Widrow B., and Stearns S.D. Adaptive Signal Processing (1985), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
4. Manolakis D.G., Ingle V.K., and Kogon S.M. Statistical and Adaptive Signal Processing: Spectral Estimation, Signal Modeling, Adaptive Filtering and Array Processing (2000), Artech House Publishers
5. Koike S. A class of adaptive step-size control algorithms for adaptive filters. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 50 6 (June 2002) 1315-1326
6. M.A. Aldajani, Adaptive step-size sign least mean squares, in: Proceedings of the International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, 2004, pp. 669-672.
7. Krstajic B., Stankovic L.J., and Uskokovic Z. An approach to variable step-size LMS algorithm. Electron. Lett. 38 16 (August 2002) 927-928
8. J.B. Evans, A new variable step-size method suitable for efficient VLSI implementation, in: Proceedings of the International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, 1991, pp. 2105-2108.
9. J. Okello, et al., A new modified variable step-size for the LMS algorithm, in: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, 1998, pp. 170-173.
10. Kwong R.H., and Johnston E.W. A variable step-size LMS algorithm. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 40 7 (July 1992) 1633-1642
11. Abousnar T., and Mayyas K. A robust variable step-size LMS-type algorithm: analysis and simulation. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 45 3 (March 1997) 631-639
12. Harris R.W., Chabries D., and Bishop F. A variable step (VS) adaptive filter algorithm. IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process. ASSP-34 2 (April 1986) 309-316
13. Shan T.J., and Kailath T. Adaptive algorithms with automatic gain control feature. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. 35 1 (January 1988) 122-127
14. Shin H.C., Sayed A.H., and Song W.J. Variable step-size NLMS and affine projection algorithms. IEEE Signal Process. Lett. 11 2 (2004) 132-135
15. Wei Y., Gelfand S.B., and Krogmeier J.V. Noise-constrained Least Mean Square algorithm. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 49 9 (September 2001) 1961-1970
16. Mader A., Puder H., and Schmidt G.U. Step-size control for acoustic echo cancellation filters-an overview. Signal Process. 80 (2000) 1697-1719
17. Benesty J., Rey H., Vega L.R., and Tressens S. A nonparametric VSS NLMS algorithm. IEEE Signal Process. Lett. 12 10 (2006) 581-584
18. S. Koike, A novel adaptive step-size control algorithm for adaptive filters, in: Proceedings of the International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, 1999, pp. 1845-1848.
19. C.G. Lopes, J.C.M. Bermudez, Evaluation and design of variable step-size adaptive algorithms, in: Proceedings of the International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, 2001, pp. 3845-3848.
20. Chimeno M.F., and Pallàs-Areny R. A comprehensive model for power line interference in biopotential measurements. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 49 3 (June 2000) 535-540
21. Almenar V., and Albiol A. A new adaptive scheme for ECG enhancement. Signal Process. 75 (1999) 253-263
22. M.H. Costa, J.C.M. Bermudez, A robust variable step-size algorithm for LMS adaptive filters, in: Proceedings of the International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, 2006, pp. 93-96.
23. Sayed A.H. Fundamentals of Adaptive Filtering (2003), Wiley-IEEE Press
24. Minkoff J. Comment: On the unnecessary assumption of statistical independence between reference signal and filter weights in feedforward adaptive systems. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 49 5 (May 2001) 1109
25. Papoulis A. Probability, Random Variables and Stochastic Processes (1991), McGraw-Hill, New York
26. M.C. Tavares, M.H. Costa, F.A. Costa, F.M. Azevedo, Microcontroller-based multiprocessor system for ECG, EEG and MLAEP registering during surgery, in: Proceedings of the World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, 2003, p. 1.
27. Goldberger A.L., et al. PhysioBank, PhysioToolkit, and PhysioNet: components of a new research resource for complex physiologic signals. Circulation 101 23 (2000) e215-e220
28. Croft R.J., and Barry R.J. EOG correction: a new perspective. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 107 (1998) 387-394
29. He P., Wilson G., and Russel C. Removal of ocular artifacts from electro-encephalogram by adaptive filtering. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 42 (2004) 407-412
30. Bershad N.J., and Lian Z.Q. On the probability density function of the LMS adaptive filter weights. Acoust. Speech Signal Process. 37 1 (1989) 43-56
31. N. Takano, T. Maruyama, M. Tamagawa, K. Yana, EOG artifact canceling for EEG analysis using RLS adaptive filtering technique, in: Proceedings of the International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 1993, pp. 348-349.
32. Bershad N.J., Celka P., and Vesin J.M. Stochastic analysis of gradient adaptive identification of nonlinear systems with memory for Gaussian data and noisy input and output measurements. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 47 3 (1999) 675-689