Is classical electrodynamics an inconsistent theory?

Canadian Journal of Philosophy

Volumn 37, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 263-282

  Belot, Gordon ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 36049011494     PISSN: 00455091     EISSN: 19110820     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1353/cjp.2007.0014     Document Type: Review

References (9)

1. Bauer, G. and Dürr, D. 2001. 'The Maxwell-Lorentz System of a Rigid Charge.' Annales Henri Poincaré 2 (2001) 179-96
2. Feynman, R., Leighton, R. and Sands, M. 1964. The Feynman Lectures on Physics, Volume II. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley
3. Frisch, M. 2005. Inconsistency, Asymmetry, and Non-Locality: A Philosophical Investigation of Classical Electrodynamics. Oxford: Oxford University Press
4. Hörmann, G. and Kunzinger, M. 2000. 'Regularized Derivatives in a 2-Dimensional Model of Self-Interacting Fields with Singular Data.' Zeitschrift für Analysis und ihre Anwendungen 19 (2000) 147-58
5. Komech, A. and Spohn, H. 2000. 'Long-Time Asymptotics for the Coupled Maxwell-Lorentz Equations.' Communications in Partial Differential Equations 25 (2000) 559-84
6. Jackson, J. 1962. Classical Electrodynamics. New York: Wiley
7. Spohn, H. 2004. Dynamics of Charged Particles and Their Radiation Field. Oxford: Oxford University Press
8. van Fraassen, B. 1980. The Scientific Image. Oxford: Oxford University Press
9. Whittaker, E. 1947. A Treatise on the Analytical Dynamics on Particles and Rigid Bodies, 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press