Understanding resiliency of internet topology against prefix hijack attacks

Proceedings of the International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 368-377

  Lad, Mohit ^a   Oliveira, Ricardo ^c   Zhang, Beichuan ^b   Zhang, Lixia ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA TRAFFIC; INTERNET TOPOLOGY; PREFIX HIJACKS; SECURITY THREAT;

COMPUTER CRIME; COMPUTER NETWORKS; SECURITY OF DATA; TELECOMMUNICATION TRAFFIC; TOPOLOGY;

INTERNET PROTOCOLS;

EID: 36048995031     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/DSN.2007.95     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Secure Inter-Domain Routing (SIDR) Working Group. http://www1.ietf.org/ html.charters/sidr-charter.html.
2. S. S. E. Chen. Avoid BGP Best Path Transitions from One External to Another. Internet Draft, IETF, June 2006. http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ draft-ietf-idr-avoid-transition-04.txt.
3. L. Gao. On inferring autonomous system relationships in the Internet. ACM/IEEE Transactions on Networking, 9(6):733-745, 2001.
4. B. Halabi and D. McPherson. Internet Routing Architectures. Cisco Press, 2nd edition, 2000.
5. J. Karlin, S. Forrest, and J. Rexford. Pretty good bgp: Protecting bgp by cautiously selecting routes. Technical Report TR-CS-2005-37, University of New Mexico, Octber 2005.
6. S. Kent, C. Lynn, and K. Seo. Secure Border Gateway Protocol. IEEE Journal of Selected Areas in Communications, 18(4), 2000.
7. S. Kent, C. Lynn, and K. Seo. Secure border gateway protocol (S-BGP). IEEE JSAC Special Issue on Network Security, 2000.
8. M. Lad, D. Massey, D. Pei, Y. Wu, B. Zhang, and L. Zhang. PHAS: A prefix hijack alert system. In 15th USENIX Security Symposium, 2006.
9. S. S. M. Zhao and D. Nicol. Aggregated path authentication for efficient bgp security. In 12th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS), November 2005.
10. J. Ng. Extensions to BGP to Support Secure Origin BGP. ftp://ftp-eng.cisco.com/sobgp/drafts/draft-ng-sobgp-bgp-extensions-02.txt, April 2004.
11. R. Oliveira, B. Zhang, D. Pei, R. Izhak-Ratzin, and L. Zhang. Quantifying Path Exploration in the Internet. In ACM SIG-COMM/USENIX Internet Measurement Conference(IMC), October 2006.
12. A. C. Popescu, B. J. Premore, and T. Underwood. Anatomy of a leak: AS 9121. NANOG-34, May 2005.
13. S. Qiu, F. Monrose, A. Terzis, and P. McDaniel. Efficient techniques for detecting false origin advertisements in inter-domain routing. In Second workshop on Secure Network Protocols (NPSec), 2006.
14. A. Ramachandran and N. Feamster. Understanding the network-level behavior of spammers. In Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM, 2006.
15. Y. Rekhter, T. Li, and S. Hares. Border Gateway Protocol 4. RFC 4271, Internet Engineering Task Force, January 2006.
16. RIPE. Routing information service: myASn System. http://www.ris.ripe.net/ myasn.html.
17. B. R. Smith, S. Murphy, and J. J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves. Securing the border gateway routing protocol. In Global Internet'96, November 1996.
18. L. Subramanian, V. Roth, I. Stoica, S. Shenker, and R. H. Katz. Listen and whisper: Security mechanisms for BGP. In Proceedings of ACM NDSI2004, March 2004.
19. W. Xu and J. Rexford. MIRO: multi-path interdomain routing. In SIGCOMM, pages 171-182, 2006.
20. B. Zhang, R. Liu, D. Massey, and L. Zhang. Internet Topology Project. http://irl.cs.ucla.edu/topology/.
21. B. Zhang, R. Liu, D. Massey, and L. Zhang. Collecting the Internet's AS level topology. In ACM Sigcomm Computer Communication Review, 2005.