Cohabitation in the Philippines: Attitudes and behaviors among young women and men

Journal of Marriage and Family

Volumn 69, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 1244-1256

  Williams, Lindy ^a   Kabamalan, Midea ^b,c   Ogena, Nimfa ^b,c  

^a Cornell University ^*  (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES   (Philippines)

^c UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES   (Philippines)

Author keywords

Asian Pacific Islander families; Cohabitation; Coresidence; Family; Marriage; Youth emergent adulthood

Indexed keywords

EID: 36048994583     PISSN: 00222445     EISSN: 17413737     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2007.00444.x     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Acock, A. C 2005). Working with missing values. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 1012 1028.
2. Adams, B. N 2004). Families and family studies in international perspective. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 1076 1088.
3. Becker, G 1991). A treatise on family (Rev. ed Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press.
4. Berja, C. L. Kabamalan, M. M 2004). 2002 young adult fertility and sexuality survey: Technical notes. In C. M. Raymundo G. T. Cruz (Eds Youth sex and risk behaviors (pp. 166 175). Quezon City : Demographic Research and Development Foundation and University of the Philippines, Population Institute.
5. Blaikie, N 2003). Analyzing quantitative data: From description to explanation. London : Sage.
6. Brown, S 2005). How cohabitation is reshaping American families. Contexts, 4 (3), 33 37.
7. Bumpass, L. Lu, H. H 2000). Trends in cohabitation and implications for children's family contexts in the United States. Population Studies, 54, 29 41.
8. Casper, L. M. Bianchi, S. M 2002). Trends in the American Family. Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage.
9. Casper, L. M. Sayer, L. C 2000, March). Cohabitation transitions: Different attitudes and purposes, different paths. Paper presented at the Annual Meetings of the Population Association of America, Los Angeles.
10. Cherlin, A. J 2004). The deinstitutionalization of American marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 848 861.
11. Clarkberg, M. E., Stolzenberg, R. M. Waite, L. J 1995). Attitudes, values, and entrance into cohabitational versus marital unions. Social Forces, 74, 609 634.
12. Cunningham, M. Thornton, A 2005). The influence of union transition on white adults' attitudes toward cohabitation. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 710 720.
13. Dixon, R 1978). Late marriage and non-marriage as demographic responses: Are they similar? Population Studies, 32, 449 466.
14. Goldstein, J. R. Kenney, C. T 2001). Marriage delayed or marriage forgone? New cohort forecasts of first marriage for U.S. women. American Sociological Review, 66, 506 519.
15. Haskey, J 2001). Cohabitation in Great Britain: Past, present and future trends and attitudes. Population Trends, 103, 4 25.
16. Heuveline, P. Timberlake, J. M 2004). The role of cohabitation in family formation: The United States in comparative perspective. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 1214 1230.
17. Jejeebhoy, S 1995). Women's education, autonomy, and reproductive behavior: Experience from developing countries. New York : Oxford University Press.
18. Jones, G. W 1997). The demise of universal marriage in East and South-East Asia. In G. W. Jones, R. M. Douglas, J. C. Caldwell R. M. D'Souza (Eds The continuing demographic transition (pp. 51 79). Oxford, UK : Claredon Press.
19. Jones, G. W 2004). Not "when to marry" but "whether to marry": The changing context of marriage decisions in East and Southeast Asia. In G. W. Jones K. Ramdas (Eds Untying the knot: Ideal and reality in Asian marriage (pp. 3 56). Singapore : Asia Research Institute, National University of Singapore.
20. Jones, G. W 2005). The 'flight from marriage' in Southeast Asia. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 36 (1 93 119.
21. Kabamalan, M. M 2004). New path to marriage: The significance of increasing cohabitation in the Philippines. Philippine Population Review, 3, 111 127.
22. Kiernan, K 2000). European perspectives on union formation. In L. J. Waite (Ed The ties that bind: Perspectives on marriage and cohabitation (pp. 40 58). Hawthorne, NY : Aldine de Gruyter.
23. Kiernan, K 2002). Cohabitation in Western Europe: Trends, issues, and implications. In A. Booth A. Crouter (Eds Just living together: Implications of cohabitation on families, children, and social policy (pp. 3 31). Florence, KY : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
24. Kiernan, K 2004). Redrawing the boundaries of marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 980 987.
25. Leete, R 1994). The continuing flight from marriage and parenthood among the overseas Chinese in East and Southeast Asia: Dimensions and implications. Population and Development Review, 20, 811 829.
26. Lesthaeghe, R 1998). On theory development: Applications to the study of family. Population and Development Review, 24, 1 14.
27. Manning, W. D 2001). Childbearing in cohabiting unions: Racial and ethnic differences. Family Planning Perspectives, 33, 217 223.
28. Medina, B. T. G 1991). The Filipino Family. Quezon City, The Philippines : University of the Philippines Press.
29. Mynarska, M 2006 March-April). Meanings and attitudes attached to cohabitation in Poland. Paper presented at the Annual Meetings of the Population Association of America, Los Angeles.
30. Oppenheimer, V. K 1994). Women's rising employment and the future of the family in industrial societies. Population and Development Review, 20, 293 342.
31. Oppenheimer, V. K 1997). Women's employment and the gain to marriage: The specialization and trading model. Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 431 453.
32. Prinz, C 1995). Cohabiting, married or single: Portraying, analyzing, and modeling new living arrangements in the changing societies of Europe. England : Avebury.
33. Rele, J. R. Alam, I 1993). Fertility transition in Asia: The statistical evidence. In R. Leete I. Alam (Eds The revolution in Asian fertility (pp. 15 38). New York : Oxford University Press.
34. Sassler, S. Schoen, R 1999). The effect of attitudes and economic activity on marriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 147 159.
35. Seltzer, J. A 2004). Cohabitation in the United States and Britain: Demography, kinship, and the future. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 921 928.
36. Smock, P. J 2000). Cohabitation in the United States: An appraisal of research themes, findings, and implications. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 1 20.
37. Sweeney, M. M 2002). Two decades of family change: The shifting economic foundations of marriage. American Sociological Review, 67 (1 132 147.
38. Thornton, A 1991). Influence of marital history of parents on the marital and cohabitation experiences of children. American Journal of Sociology, 96, 868 894.
39. Thornton, A., Axinn, W. G. Hill, D. H 1992). Reciprocal effects of religiosity, cohabitation, and marriage. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 628 651.
40. Thornton, A., Axinn, W. G. Teachman, J. D 1995). The influence of school enrollment and accumulation on cohabitation and marriage in early adulthood. American Sociological Review, 60, 762 774.
41. Xie, Y., Raymo, J. M., Goyette, K. Thornton, A 2003). Economic potential and entry into marriage and cohabitation. Demography, 40, 351 367.
42. Williams, L. B. Guest, M. P 2005). Attitudes toward marriage among the urban middle-class in Vietnam, Thailand, and the Philippines. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 36 (2 163 186.