Reliability and validity issues related to interactive tailored patient assessments: A case study

Journal of Medical Internet Research

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2007, Pages

  Ruland, Cornelia M ^a,b,c   Bakken, Suzanne ^c   Røislien, Jo ^a,b  

^a OSLO UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^c Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

Author keywords

Interactive tailored patient assessments; Reliability; Validity

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FEASIBILITY STUDY; HUMAN; MEASUREMENT; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; PATIENT ASSESSMENT; PSYCHOMETRY; RELIABILITY; SYMPTOMATOLOGY; TECHNIQUE; THEORETICAL STUDY; VALIDITY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DIAGNOSIS; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; PATIENT CARE; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARD;

DIAGNOSIS; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; HUMANS; PATIENT-CENTERED CARE; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 36048992334     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14388871     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2196/jmir.9.3.e22     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. White TM, Hauan MJ. The capture and use of detailed process information in the Dialogix system for structured web-based interactions. Proc AMIA Symp 2001:761-765.
2. Wittchen HU. Reliability and validity studies of the WHO - Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI): a critical review. J Psychiatr Res 1994;28 (1):57-84.
3. Norbeck JS. What constitutes a publishable report of instrument development? Nurs Res 1985;34(6):380-382.
4. Ruland CM. Decision support for patient preference-based care planning: effects on nursing care and patient outcomes. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1999;6(4):304-312
5. Ruland CM. Handheld technology to improve patient care: evaluating a support system for preference-based care planning at the bedside. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2002;9(2):192-201
6. Ruland CM, White T, Stevens M, Fanciullo G, Khilani SM. Effects of a computerized system to support shared decision making in symptom management of cancer patients: preliminary results. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2003;10(6):573-579
7. DeVellis RF. Scale Development: Theory and Applications. 2nd edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2003.
8. Streiner DL. Being inconsistent about consistency: when coefficient alpha does and doesn't matter. J Pers Assess 2003 Jun;80(3):217-222.
9. Bollen K, Lennox R. Conventional wisdom on measurement: a structural equation perspective. Psychol Bull 1991;110(2):305-314.
10. Kreuter MW, Bull FC, Clark EM, Oswald DL. Understanding how people process health information: a comparison of tailored and nontailored weight-loss materials. Health Psychol 1999 Sep;18(5):487-494.
11. Radloff LS. The CES-D Scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas 1977;1(3):385-401.
12. Andersen R, Ruland C, Slaughter L, Andersen T, Jacobsen W. Clustering techniques for organizing cancer-related concepts into meaningful groups for patients. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2005:882.
13. Carmines EG, Zeller RA. Reliability and Validity Assessment. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 1979.
14. Pedhazur EJ, Schmelkin LP. Measurement, Design, and Analysis: An Integrated Approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1991.
15. Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric Theory. 3rd edition. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994.
16. Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 1951;16(3):297-334.
17. Ruland C, Røslien Jo, Bakken S, Kristiansen J. Comparing tailored computerized symptom assessments to interviews and questionnaires. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2006:1081
18. Tinsley HEA, Tinsley DJ. Uses of factor analysis in counselling psychological research. J Couns Psychol 1987;34(4):414-424.
19. Comrey AL. Factor-analytic methods of scale development in personality and clinical psychology. J Consult Clin Psychol 1988 Oct;56(5):754-761.
20. Campbell DT, Fiske DW. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychol Bull 1959 Mar;56(2):81-105.
21. Miaskowski C. Gender differences in pain, fatigue, and depression in patients with cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2004(32):139-143.
22. Ware JE, Gandek B. Overview of the SF-36 Health Survey and the International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) Project. J Clin Epidemiol 1998 Nov;51(11):903-912.