MEG mapping in multiple sclerosis patients

Europa Medicophysica

Volumn 43, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 345-348

  Kotini, A ^a   Anninos, P ^a   Tamiolakis, D ^b  

^a DEMOCRITUS UNIVERSITY OF THRACE   (Greece)

^b Chania General Hospital St George   (Greece)

Author keywords

Brain; Magnetoencephalography; Multiple sclerosis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; CASE CONTROL STUDY; FEMALE; FOURIER ANALYSIS; HUMAN; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; SIGNAL PROCESSING;

ADULT; BRAIN MAPPING; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CEREBRUM; FEMALE; FOURIER ANALYSIS; HUMANS; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS, CHRONIC PROGRESSIVE; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 36048988694     PISSN: 00142573     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Anninos PA, Tsagas N, Jacobson JI, Kotini A. The biological effects of magnetic stimulation in epileptic patients. Panminerva Med 1999;41:207-15.
2. Rose DF, Ducla-Soares R. Comparison of electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography. In: Sato S editor. Magnetoencephalography. New York: Raven Press; 1990.
3. Anninos PA. Electromagnetic fields generated from neuronal activity, T.I.T. J Life Sci 1973;31:5-18.
4. Adams RD, Victor M. Principles of neurology. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company; 1985.
5. Rao SM. Neurophysiology of multiple sclerosis: a critical review. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1986;8:503-42.
6. Medana IM, Esiri MM. Axonal damage: a key predictor of outcome in human CNS diseases. Brain 2003;126:515-30.
7. Matthews PM, De Stefano N, Narayanan S, Francis GS, Wolinsky JS, Antel JP et al. Putting magnetic resonance spectroscopy studies in context: axonal damage and disability in multiple sclerosis. Semin Neurol 1998;18:327-36.
8. Bjartmar C, Wujek JR, Trapp BD. Axonal loss in the pathology of MS: consequences for understanding the progressive phase of the disease. J Neurol Sci 2003;206:165-71.
9. Dijkhuizen RM, Singhal AB, Mandeville JB, Wu O, Halpern EF, Finklestein SP et al. Correlation between brain reorganization, ischemic damage, and neurologic status after transient focal cerebral ischemia in rats: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J Neurosci 2003;23:510-17.
10. Cramer SC, Nelles G, Benson RR, Kaplan JD, Parker RA, Kwong KK et al. A functional MRI study of subjects recovered from hemiparetic stroke. Stroke 1997;28:2518-27.
11. Marshall RS, Perera GM, Lazar RM, Krakauer JW, Constantine RC, DeLaPaz RL. Evolution of cortical activation during recovery from corticospinal tract infarction. Stroke 2000;31:656-61.
12. Lee M, Reddy H, Johansen-Berg H, Pendlebury S, Jenkinson M, Smith S et al. The motor cortex shows adaptive functional changes to brain injury from multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 2000;47:606-13.
13. Reddy H, Narayanan S, Matthews PM, Hoge RD, Pike GB, Duquette P et al. Relating axonal injury to functional recovery in MS. Neurology 2000;54:236-9.
14. Pantano P, Iannetti GD, Caramia F, Mainero C, Di Legge S, Bozzao L et al. Cortical motor reorganization after a single clinical attack of multiple sclerosis. Brain 2002;125:1607-15.
15. Johansen-Berg H, Rushworth MF, Bogdanovic MD, Kischka U, Wimalaratna S, Matthews PM. The role of ipsilateral premotor cortex in hand movement after stroke. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002;99:14518-23.
16. Rocca MA, Matthews PM, Caputo D, Ghezzi A, Falini A, Scotti G et al. Evidence for widespread movement-associated functional MRI changes in patients with PPMS. Neurology 2002;58:866-72.
17. Voogd J, Glickstein M. The anatomy of the cerebellum. Trends Neurosci 1998;21:370-5.
18. Doyon J, Song AW, Karni A, Lalonde F, Adams MM, Ungerleider LG. Experience-dependent changes in cerebellar contributions to motor sequence learning. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002;99:1017-22.
19. Saini S, DeStefano N, Smith S, Guidi L, Amato MP, Federico A et al Altered cerebellar functional connectivity mediates potential adaptive plasticity in patients with multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2004;75:840-6.
20. Lublin FD, Reingold SC. Defining the clinical course of multiple sclerosis: results of an international survey. Neurology 1996;46:907-11.
21. Kurtze JF. Rating neurological impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology 1983;33:1444-52.
22. Jasper HH. The ten-twenty electrode system of the International Federation. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1958;10:367-80.
23. Anninos PA, Tsagas N, Sandyk R, Derpapas K. Magnetic stimulation in the treatment of partial seizures. Int J Neurosci 1991;60:141-71.
24. Karhu J, Hari R, Makela JP, Huttunen J, Knuutila J. Cortical somatosensory magnetic responses in multiple sclerosis. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1992;83:192-200.
25. Kassubek J, Soros P, Kober H, Stippich C, Vieth JB. Focal slow and beta brain activity in patients with multiple sclerosis revealed by magnetoencephalography. Brain Topogr 1999;11:193-200.
26. Cohen D, Cuffin N, Yonokuchi K, Maniewski R, Purcell C, Cosgrove GR et al. MEG versus EEG localization test using implanted sources in the human brain. Ann Neurol 1990;28:811-7.
27. Lednew W. Possible mechanisms for the influence of weak magnetic fields on biological systems. Bioelectromagnetics 1991;12:71-6.
28. Jacobson JI. Oncogenes and magnetic resonance energies unified algebraically. Panminerva Med 1987;29:97-104.
29. Nordenstrom B. The paradigm of biologically closed electric circuits (BCEC systems). Eur Surg 1994:574:7-23.