Does data warehouse end-user metadata add value?

Communications of the ACM

Volumn 50, Issue 11, 2007, Pages 70-77

  Foshay, Neil ^a   Mukherjee, Avinandan ^b   Taylor, Andrew ^c  

^a ST FRANCIS XAVIER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b MONTCLAIR STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c BRADFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE APPLICATIONS; KNOWLEDGE WORKERS; QUERY ANALYSIS;

DATA ACQUISITION; DATA WAREHOUSES; DECISION MAKING; INTELLIGENT AGENTS; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; QUERY LANGUAGES;

METADATA;

EID: 36048988016     PISSN: 00010782     EISSN: 15577317     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/1297797.1297800     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Ballou, D.P. and Tayi, K. Enhancing data quality in data warehouse environments. Commun. ACM 42, 1 (Jan. 1999), 73-78.
2. Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R., and Warshaw, P. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science 35, 8 (Aug. 1989), 982-1003.
3. Dempsey, L. and Heery, R. Metadata: A current view of practice and issues. Journal of Documentation 54, 2 (Feb. 1985), 145-172.
4. Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I. Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1975.
5. Fisher, C.W., Smith I., and Bailou, D. The impact of experience and time on the use of data quality information in decision making. Information Systems Research 14, 2 (June 2003), 170-188.
6. Gardner, S.R. Building the data warehouse. Commun. ACM 41, 9 (Sept. 1998), 52-60.
7. Haley, B.J. and Watson, H. Managerial considerations. Commun. ACM 41, 9 (Sept. 1998), 32-37.
8. Laney, D. Mapping the enterprise genome; www.intelligentent.erprise.com.
9. Raden, N. Dashboarding ourselves. Intelligent Enterprise 7, 8 (May 2004).
10. Tannenbaum, A. Metadata Solutions: Using Metamodels, Repositories, XML, and Enterprise Portals to Generate Information on Demand. Addison-Wesley, Boston, 2002.